Gilbert v. Shalala (1995)

green · 153 citation events across 14 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 50

Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

199520102026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Hulett v. Chater (1997)

Quote Authority · 10th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Gilbert, 45 F.3d at 1394 (“We review the district court’s determination of whether the government’s position was substantially justified for abuse of discretion.”).

“We review the district court’s determination of whether the government’s position was substantially justified for abuse of discretion.”

green H.D. Hulett v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner, Social Security Administration (1997)

Quote Authority · 10th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Gilbert, 45 F.3d at 1394 ("We review the district court's determination of whether the government's position was substantially justified for abuse of discretion.").

"We review the district court's determination of whether the government's position was substantially justified for abuse of discretion."

green Groberg v. Astrue (2012)

Rule Authority · 10th Cir.

In other words, the government’s position must have had a “reasonable basis both in law and fact.” Id. (internal quotation marks omitted); Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir.1995). “ ‘[Pjosition of the United States’ means, in addition to the position taken by the United States in the civil action, the action or failure to act by the agency upon which the civil action is based.” 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d)(2)(D).

green Dorman v. Astrue (2011)

Rule Authority · 10th Cir.

Id. at 559 , 108 S.Ct. 2541 ; Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir.1995).

green Harrold v. Astrue (2010)

Rule Authority · 10th Cir.

“We review the district court’s determination of whether the government’s position was substantially justified for abuse of discretion.” Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir.1995).

green Al-Maleki v. Holder (2009)

Rule Authority · 10th Cir.

Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir.1995).

green Pritchett v. Astrue (2008)

Rule Authority · 10th Cir.

green Veltman v. Astrue (2008)

Rule Authority · 10th Cir.

Id. at 559 , 108 S.Ct. 2541 ; Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir.1995).

green Madrid v. Astrue (2007)

Rule Authority · 10th Cir.

Pierce, 487 U.S. at 559 , 108 S.Ct. 2541 ; Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir.1995).

green McAfee v. Social Security Administration (2021)

Rule Authority · D.N.M. · 2 citations in this opinion

Hackett, 475 F.3d at 1172 (citing Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995)).

green Padilla v. Social Security Administration (2020)

Rule Authority · D.N.M. · 2 citations in this opinion

Id. (citing Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995)).

green Bill M. Noah v. Robert A. McDonald (2016)

Quote Authority · Vet. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion

See Day v. Shalala, 23 F.3d 1052, 1066 (6th Cir. 1994) (although the denial notice "failed to satisfy the requirements of due process, the only claimants who could have been injured by the inadequacy are those who detrimentally relied on the inadequate denial notice"); see also Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995) ("[A] plaintiff must demonstrate reliance on the allegedly defective denial notices."); Burks-Marshall v. Shalala, 7 F.3d 1346, 1349 (8th Cir. 1…

"[A] plaintiff must demonstrate reliance on the allegedly defective denial notices."

green Betzaida P. Jernigan v. Eric K. Shinseki (2012)

Quote Authority · Vet. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

See Day, 23 F.3d at 1066 (holding that, although the denial notice that claimants received “failed to satisfy the requirements of due process, the only claimants who could have been injured by the inadequacy are those who detrimentally relied on the inadequate denial notice”); Gilbert, 45 F.3d at 1394 (“[A] plaintiff must demonstrate reliance on the allegedly defective denial notices.”); Burks-Marshall, 7 F.3d at 1349 (holding that an appellant has no standing to raise a due…

“[A] plaintiff must demonstrate reliance on the allegedly defective denial notices.”

green Amor Ayala v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security (2026)

Rule Authority · D.N.M.

Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995).

green Ronda A. Ballou v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security (2026)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th 1In relevant part, the EAJA states: (d)(1)(A) . . . a court shall award to a prevailing party other than the United States fees and other expenses . . . unless the court finds that the position of the United States was substantially justified or that special circumstances make an award unjust. . . . (2)(A) For the purposes of this subsection-- . . . (ii) attorney fees shall not be awarded in excess of $125 per hour unless the cour…

green Magallanes v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2024)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995) (citing Estate of Smith v. O=Halloran, 930 F.2d 1496 , 1501 (10th Cir. 1991)).

citing Estate of Smith v. O=Halloran, 930 F.2d 1496 , 1501 (10th Cir. 1991)

green United States v. Fox Run Apartments, LLC (2024)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995).

green Morfitt-Shumway v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration (2024)

Rule Authority · D. Colo.

The test for substantial justification in this circuit is one of reasonableness in law and fact.” Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995).

green Arnold v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2023)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

“The government bears the burden of showing that its position was substantially justified.” Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995).

green Davis v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration (2023)

Rule Authority · D. Colo.

“The test for substantial justification in this circuit is one of reasonableness in law and fact.” Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995). “[T]he government’s position must be ‘justified to a degree that could satisfy a reasonable person.’” Hackett II, 475 F.3d at 1172 (quoting Pierce v. Underwood, 487 U.S. 552, 565 (1988)).

green Contreras v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration (2023)

Rule Authority · D. Colo.

In the Tenth Circuit, “substantial justification” requires a showing of “reasonableness in law and fact.” Id. (quoting Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995)).

green Ramirez v. Social Security Administration (2023)

Rule Authority · D.N.M.

Hackett, 475 F.3d at 1172 (citing Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995)).

green Cuesta v. SMT Holdings LLC (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Colo.

As indicated above, Mr. Cuesta “bear[s] the burden of proving standing with the manner and degree of evidence required at the particular stage of the litigation.” Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995).

green Martinez v. Social Security Administration (2022)

Rule Authority · D.N.M.

Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995).

green Spencer v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Colo.

In the Tenth Circuit, “substantial justification” requires a showing of “reasonableness in law and fact.” Id. (quoting Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995)).

green Southern v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2021)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

July 12, 2018) (citing Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995)).

green Reese v. Social Security Administration (2021)

Rule Authority · D.N.M.

“The test for substantial justification in this circuit is one of reasonableness in law and fact.” Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir 1995) (citing Gutierrez v. Sullivan, 953 F.2d 579, 585 (10th Cir. 1992)). “[T]he government’s position can be justified even though it is not correct.” Hackett, 475 F.3d at 1172 (quotation marks and quotation omitted).

citing Gutierrez v. Sullivan, 953 F.2d 579, 585 (10th Cir. 1992)

green Davis v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2021)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995) (citing Estate of Smith v. O=Halloran, 930 F.2d 1496 , 1501 (10th Cir. 1991)).

citing Estate of Smith v. O=Halloran, 930 F.2d 1496 , 1501 (10th Cir. 1991)

green Montoya v. Social Security Administration (2021)

Rule Authority · D.N.M.

Hackett, 475 F.3d at 1172 (citing Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995)).

green Pope v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2021)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995) (citing Estate of Smith v. O=Halloran, 930 F.2d 1496 , 1501 (10th Cir. 1991)).

citing Estate of Smith v. O=Halloran, 930 F.2d 1496 , 1501 (10th Cir. 1991)

green Garcia v. Social Security Administration (2021)

Rule Authority · D.N.M.

citing Gutierrez v. Sullivan, 953 F.2d 579, 585 (10th Cir. 1992)

green Thomas v. Social Security Administration (2021)

Rule Authority · D.N.M.

Hackett, 475 F.3d at 1172 (citing Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995)).

green Barnett v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2020)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995) (citing Estate of Smith v. O=Halloran, 930 F.2d 1496 , 1501 (10th Cir. 1991)).

citing Estate of Smith v. O=Halloran, 930 F.2d 1496 , 1501 (10th Cir. 1991)

green Bleau v. Social Security Administration (2020)

Rule Authority · D.N.M.

Hackett, 475 F.3d at 1172 (citing Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995)).

green Zambrano v. Social Security Administration (2020)

Rule Authority · D.N.M.

Id. (citing Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995)).

green McNary v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2020)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

The ALJ further found that Plaintiff was not disabled at step four based on the vocational expert’s 1 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d)(1)(A); Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995). 2 Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 301-02 (1993). 3 Gilbert, 45 F.3d at 1394 . 4 Quintero v. Colvin, 642 F. App’x 793, 796 (10th Cir. 2016); Hackett v. Barnhart, 475 F.3d 1166, 1172 (10th Cir. 2007) (quoting Pierce v. Underwood, 487 U.S. 552, 565 (1988)) (internal quotation marks omitted).…

green Thompson v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2020)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Hackett v. Barnhart, 475 F.3d 1166, 1172 (10th Cir. 2007); Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995) (citing Estate of Smith v. O=Halloran, 930 F.2d 1496 , 1501 (10th Cir. 1991)).

citing Estate of Smith v. O=Halloran, 930 F.2d 1496 , 1501 (10th Cir. 1991)

green Peplinski v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2020)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

The EAJA, 28 U.S.C. ' 2412, requires that a court award a fee to a prevailing plaintiff unless the court finds that the position of the 2 United States was substantially justified.2 Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995) (citing Estate of Smith v. O=Halloran, 930 F.2d 1496 , 1501 (10th Cir. 1991)).

citing Estate of Smith v. O=Halloran, 930 F.2d 1496 , 1501 (10th Cir. 1991)

green Morris v. Social Security Administration (2019)

Rule Authority · D.N.M.

The parties here disagree on the second factor: whether the position of the Commissioner was “substantially justified.” “The test for substantial justification in this circuit is one of reasonableness in law and fact.” Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir 1995) (citing Gutierrez v. Sullivan, 953 F.2d 579, 585 (10th Cir. 1992)).

citing Gutierrez v. Sullivan, 953 F.2d 579, 585 (10th Cir. 1992)

green Valderas v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2019)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

July 12, 2018) (citing Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995)).

green Johnson v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2019)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995) (citing Estate of Smith v. O=Halloran, 930 F.2d 1496 , 1501 (10th Cir. 1991)).

citing Estate of Smith v. O=Halloran, 930 F.2d 1496 , 1501 (10th Cir. 1991)

green Sigmon v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2019)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995) (citing Estate of Smith v. O’Halloran, 930 F.2d 1496 , 1501 (10th Cir. 1991)).

citing Estate of Smith v. O’Halloran, 930 F.2d 1496 , 1501 (10th Cir. 1991)

green Greer v. Social Security Administration (2019)

Rule Authority · D.N.M.

Hackett, 475 F.3d at 1172 (citing Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995)).

green Dugan v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2019)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995) (citing Estate of Smith v. O=Halloran, 930 F.2d 1496 , 1501 (10th Cir. 1991)).

citing Estate of Smith v. O=Halloran, 930 F.2d 1496 , 1501 (10th Cir. 1991)

green Thomas H. Buffington v. Robert L. Wilkie (2019)

Rule Authority · Vet. App.

"Without such reliance, the injury is not fairly traceable to the challenged action." Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995).

green Patricia Mosley v. Texas Health and Human Services Commission and Texas Department of Family and Protective S… (2019)

Rule Authority · Tex.

See, e.g., Loudermilk v. Barnhart, 290 F.3d 1265 , 1269–70 (11th Cir. 2002); Torres v. Shalala, 48 F.3d 887, 893 (5th Cir. 1995); Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995); Day v. Shalala, 23 F.3d 1052, 1066 (6th Cir. 1994); Burks- Marshall v. Shalala, 7 F.3d 1346, 1349 (8th Cir. 1993).

green Bivens v. Salt Lake City Corp. (2017)

Quote Authority · Utah

See Miller v. Potter , 198 Fed.Appx. 794 , 796 (11th Cir. 2006) ("In order to show that the notice ... violated his due process rights, Miller must show that (1) the notice was defective, and (2) he detrimentally relied upon that notice."); Gilbert v. Shalala , 45 F.3d 1391 , 1394 (10th Cir. 1995) ("[A] plaintiff must demonstrate reliance on the allegedly defective ... notice[ ]."); Noah v. McDonald , 28 Vet.App. 120 , 132 (2016) ("To prevail on his [procedural due process c…

"[A] plaintiff must demonstrate reliance on the allegedly defective ... notice[ ]."

green Martin v. Colvin (2016)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir.1995) (citing Estate of Smith v. O’Halloran, 930 F.2d 1496 , 1501 (10th Cir.1991)).

green Badar v. Colvin (2016)

Rule Authority · D. Colo.

The test for substantial justification in this circuit is one of reasonableness in law and fact.” Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir. 1995).

green Sommerville v. Astrue (2008)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Gilbert v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 1391, 1394 (10th Cir.1995).