Ohio Ass'n of Public School Employees v. Lakewood City School District Board of Education (1994)

green · 70 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 12 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 12

Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

199520102026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Twang, L.L.C. v. Cincinnati (2024)

Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.

Bd. of Edn., 68 Ohio St.3d 175, 176 (1994). {¶60} A meaningful opportunity to be heard “must be granted at a time when the deprivation can still be prevented.” Fuentes at 81 .

green Quester v. Quester (2024)

Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.

Bd. of Edn., 68 Ohio St.3d 175, 177 (1994).

green State v. Carter (2022)

Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.

Dist., 68 Ohio St.3d 175, 179 (1994).

green State v. Howard (2020)

Quote Authority · Ohio Ct. App.

School Emps. v. Lakewood City School Dist., 68 Ohio St.3d 175, 179 , 624 N.E.2d 1043 (1994) (“Even in criminal law, the right to confrontation is not absolute.”). -25- offenses from the trauma of testifying in a defendant’s presence.” Id. at ¶ 61.

“Even in criminal law, the right to confrontation is not absolute.”

green Singer v. Singer (2019)

Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.

Bd. of Edn., 68 Ohio St.3d 175, 176 (1994), citing Cleveland Bd. of Edn. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 542 (1985).

green Fowler v. Menards, Inc. (2018)

Quote Authority · Ohio Ct. App.

Bd. of Edn. , 68 Ohio St.3d 175 , 624 N.E.2d 1043 (1994) (" Lakewood "), and State v. Arnold , 147 Ohio St.3d 138 , 2016-Ohio-1595 , 62 N.E.3d 153 (" Arnold "), in an apparent attempt to support that the "Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution" requires appellant be given a chance to challenge the receipts and agreement terms admitted in closing arguments. {¶ 47} After reviewing Lakewood and Arnold , we disagree. {¶ 48} We first note that Arnold provides an analys…

" Lakewood "

green Ash v. Dean (2016)

Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.

Bd. of Edn., 68 Ohio St.3d 175, 179 (1994); accord Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 269 (1970) ("In almost every setting where No. 15AP-144 10 important decisions turn on questions of fact, due process requires an opportunity to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses.").

green Guenther v. Sheffield Lake Zoning Bd. of Appeals (2015)

Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.

Bd. of Edn., 68 Ohio St.3d 175, 176 (1994), citing Cleveland Bd. of Edn. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 (1985).

green Akron v. Jackson (2014)

Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.

Bd. of Edn., 68 Ohio St.3d 175, 177 (1994).

green Forster v. De Young (2013)

Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.

Bd. of Edn., 68 Ohio St.3d 175, 177 (1994).

green Ohio Dept. of Transp. v. Storage World, Inc. (2012)

Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.

Bd. of Edn., 68 Ohio St.3d 175, 177 (1994), citing Cleveland Bd. of Edn. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 (1985).

green Thomas v. Delgado (2022)

Cited · Ohio Ct. App. · signal: see

See Miller at 176 (noting that the guardianship inventory reflected the “certificates as payable on death to plaintiffs” and that an amended inventory was filed “listing the change in payees”); In re Hards, 175 Ohio App.3d 168 , 2008-Ohio-630, ¶ 10 (11th Dist.) (noting that the summary of inventory and accounts “failed to account for guardianship assets” or establish which assets were joint assets or had a beneficiary prior to the establishment of the guardianship).