Bojana Bevc v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1995)
green
· 38 citation events
across 4 courts.
Showing the 32 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199520102026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
To be eligible for withholding of deportation, the petitioner must demonstrate by a "clear probability," Bevc v. INS. 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir.1995), that "his life or freedom would be threatened in such country on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion." 8 U.S.C. § 1253 (h)(1).
green
Sugiarto Halim v. Eric Holder, Jr. (2014)
Bhatt v. Reno, 172 F.3d 978, 982 (7th Cir.1999) (quoting Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir.1995)).
green
Victor Sirbu v. Eric Holder, Jr. (2013)
See Stanojkova, 645 F.3d at 948 (use of significant physical force against a person’s body is persecution); Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir. 1995) (applicant for asylum must show “specific, detailed facts supporting the reasonableness of her fear that she will be singled out for persecution”).
applicant for asylum must show “specific, detailed facts supporting the reasonableness of her fear that she will be singled out for persecution”
green
Pedro Flores Torres v. Eric Holder, Jr. (2008)
Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir. 1995).
green
Torres v. Mukasey (2008)
Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir.1995).
green
Tchemkou, Mireille v. Mukasey, Michael B. (2007)
Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir. 1995).
green
Tchemkou v. Gonzales (2007)
Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir.1995).
green
Varghese, George M. v. Gonzales, Alberto R. (2007)
To demonstrate that his fear is objectively reasonable, Varghese had to show “ ‘specific, detailed facts supporting the reasonableness of [his] fear that [he] will be singled out for persecution.’ ” Bhatt v. Reno, 172 F.3d 978, 982 (7th Cir.1999) (quoting Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir.1995)) (holding that Indian applicant’s testimony of beatings and threats by Hindu radicals is “too vague, speculative, and insubstantial to establish either past or future persecution…
green
Prela, Gjergj v. Ashcroft, John D. (2005)
Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir. 1995).
Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir.1995).
green
Gontcharova, Evgueni v. Ashcroft, John (2004)
See Ahmed v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 611, 618-19 (7th Cir. 2003); Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir. 1995); Carvajal-Munoz v. INS, 743 F.2d 562, 577 (7th Cir. 1984).
See Ahmed v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 611, 618-19 (7th Cir.2003); Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir.1995); Carvajal-Munoz v. INS, 743 F.2d 562, 577 (7th Cir.1984).
green
Ahmed, Djillali v. Ashcroft, John D. (2003)
As to the objective portion of the test, an asylum applicant must “present specific, detailed facts showing a good reason to fear that he or she will be singled out for persecution.” Sayaxing v. INS, 179 F.3d 515, 520 (7th Cir. 1999) (emphasis in original) (quoting Sivaainkaran v. INS, 972 F.2d 161, 163 (7th Cir. 1992), and Zulbeari v. INS, 963 F.2d 999, 1000 (7th Cir. 1992)); see also Bhatt, 172 F.3d at 982 ; Krastev v. INS, 101 F.3d 1213, 1216 (7th Cir. 1996); Bevc v. INS,…
As to the objective portion of the test, an asylum applicant must “present specific, detailed facts showing a good reason to fear that he or she will be singled out for persecution.” Sayaxing v. INS, 179 F.3d 515, 520 (7th Cir.1999) (emphasis in original) (quoting Sivaainkaran v. INS, 972 F.2d 161, 163 (7th Cir.1992), and Zulbeari v. INS, 963 F.2d 999, 1000 (7th Cir.1992)); see also Bhatt, 172 F.3d at 982 ; Krastev v. INS, 101 F.3d 1213, 1216 (7th Cir.1996); Bevc v. INS, 47 …
green
Khadije Ali Awad v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General (2003)
See Petrovic, 198 F.3d at 1037-38 (holding that general conditions of persecution faced by all ethnic Serbians in Croatia do not alone establish petitioner’s well-founded fear); Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir.1995) (holding that Serbia’s campaign of ethnic cleansing against non-Serbians did not demonstrate that petitioner, a non-Serbian, would be singled out for persecution).
green
Awad, Khadije A. v. Ashcroft, John (2003)
See Petrovic, 198 F.3d at 1037-38 (holding that general conditions of persecution faced by all ethnic Serbi- ans in Croatia do not alone establish petitioner’s well- founded fear); Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir. 1995) (holding that Serbia’s campaign of ethnic cleansing against non-Serbians did not demonstrate that petitioner, a non-Serbian, would be singled out for persecution).
holding that Serbia’s campaign of ethnic cleansing against non-Serbians did not demonstrate that petitioner, a non-Serbian, would be singled out for persecution
green
Jameran v. Ashcroft (2002)
See, e.g., Lata, 204 F.3d at 1245 ; Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir. 1995) (“[G]eneral conditions of unrest alone are insufficient to warrant relief.”); Sivaainkaran v. INS, 972 F.2d 161, 165 (7th Cir. 1992) (“[C]onditions of political upheaval which affect the populace as a whole or in large part are generally insufficient to establish eligibility for asylum.”).
“[G]eneral conditions of unrest alone are insufficient to warrant relief.”
green
Bharat Bhatt v. Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United States, and Brian Perryman, District Director of t… (1999)
Bhatt must show “specific, detailed facts supporting the reasonableness of [his] fear that [he] will be singled out for persecution.” Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir.1995); see also Krastev v. INS, 101 F.3d 1213, 1216, 1218 (7th Cir.1996).
green
Miltcho Gramatikov, Ivaylo Gramatikov and Vesselin Gramatikov v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (1997)
INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478 , 481 n. 1, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812 , 815 n. 1, 816-17, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992); Bereza v. INS, supra, 115 F.3d at 472 ; Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir.1995).
green
Maria Nelly Gonzalez and Karen Jordana Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (1996)
Urukov v. INS, 55 F.3d 222, 230 (7th Cir.1995); Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910-11 (7th Cir.1995).
See Mitev, 67 F.3d at 1333 ; Bevc v. INS., 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir.1995); Demirovski v. INS., 39 F.3d 177, 181 (7th Cir.1994). 13 Zlatkov also contends that the BIA summarily reviewed the IJ's decision.
See, e.g., Urukov v. INS, 55 F.3d 222, 229-30 (7th Cir.1995) (petitioner's arrest and one-day detention for his participation in a political rally and his low-level involvement in an illegal resistance movement were insufficient to establish a well-founded fear of future persecution based on political opinion); Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir.1995) (Serbia's campaign of ethnic cleansing against non-Serbians did not demonstrate that petitioner, a non-Serbian, would be …
We will uphold a decision of the Board if “supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole,” 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a)(4), and will reverse only where the evidence is “so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 484 , 112 S.Ct. 812, 816 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992); Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910 (1995).
See Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir.1995); Limsico v. INS, 951 F.2d 210, 212 (9th Cir.1991).
green
Dizdaric v. Gonzales (2005)
See Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir.1995) (having been a non-Serbian at a time when “ethnic cleansing” was occurring in Serbia insufficient to establish past persecution, absent a basis for fearing petitioner would be singled out).
green
Sekou Keita v. INS (1999)
See Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir. 1995) (denying asylum to non-Serbian resident of Serbia even where some other non-Serbians had been victims of “ethnic cleansing”); Safaie v. INS, 25 F.3d 636 , 640- 41 (8th Cir. 1994) (affirming denial of asylum because alien failed to show particularized fear or risk of danger different than that faced by other citizens); 1 The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA), Pub.
denying asylum to non-Serbian resident of Serbia even where some other non-Serbians had been victims of “ethnic cleansing”
See, e.g., Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir.1995) (non-Serbian living in Serbia where non-Serbians were victims of ethnic cleansing); Milosevic [v. INS], 18 F.3d 366 [ (7th Cir.1994) ] (detention and threats of torture, warnings from the Secret Police not to return to Yugoslavia); Zulbeari v. INS, 963 F.2d 999 (7th Cir.1992) (interrogation and search of home by authorities); Balazoski [v. INS], 932 F.2d 638 [(7th Cir.1991) ] (interrogation, family and friends of petiti…
See Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir.1995) (denying asylum to a non-Serbian resident of Serbia even where some other non-Serbians had been victims of "ethnic cleansing"); Balazoski v. INS, 932 F.2d 638, 641-43 (7th Cir.1991 (denying asylum for a member of a pro-Albanian organization who would return to live in the Kosovo region of then-Yugoslavia).
See Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907 (7th Cir.1995); Milosevic v. INS, 18 F.3d 366 (7th Cir.1994); Sivaainkaran v. INS, 972 F.2d 161 (7th Cir.1992); Zulbeari v. INS, 963 F.2d 999 (7th Cir.1992).
See, e.g., Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir.1995) (non-Serbian living in Serbia where non-Serbians were the victims of ethnic cleansing); Milosevic, 18 F.3d 366 (detention and threats of torture, warnings from the Secret Police not to return to Yugoslavia); Zulbeari v. INS, 963 F.2d 999 (7th Cir.1992) (interrogation and search of home by authorities); Balazoski 932 F.2d 638 (interrogation, family and friends of petitioner detained and questioned); Kaczmarczyk v. INS, 9…
See, e.g., Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir.1995) (non-Serbian living in Serbia where non-Serbians were the victims of ethnic cleansing); Sivaainkaran, 972 F.2d at 164 (petitioner was chased through a field by armed soldiers who were firing at him, and Tamils in Sri Lanka were being detained, tortured and killed); Kaczmarczyk v. INS, 933 F.2d 588, 591-92 (7th Cir.1991) (repeated arrests, frequent harassment, denial of passport, and being labeled an “anti-government act…
See Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir. 1995); Limsico v. INS, 951 F.2d 210, 212 (9th Cir. 1991).