How cited: Government of Guam ex rel. Guam Economic Development Authority v. United States · Go Syfert

Government of Guam ex rel. Guam Economic Development Authority v. United States (1999)

green · 20 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 17 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199920122026
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Auth. v. United States, 179 F.3d 630, 638 (9th Cir.1999) (citing United States v. Union Pac.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Auth. v. United States, 179 F.3d 630, 638 (9th Cir.1999) (citing United States v. Union Pac.
green CNMI v. United States (2005)
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Auth. v. United States, 179 F.3d 630, 638 (9th Cir. 1999) (citing United States v. Union Pac.
citing United States v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 353 U.S. 112, 116 (1957)
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Auth. v. United States, 179 F.3d 630, 635 (9th Cir.1999) (“[W]e are bound by the words that Congress actually used.”).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
II 9 We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo, see Government of Guam v. United States, 179 F.3d 630, 632 (9th Cir.1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party to determine the presence of any issues of material fact.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
II We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, see Government of Guam v. United States, 179 F.3d 630, 632 (9th Cir.1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party to determine the presence of any issues of material fact.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
II. 5 We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo "to determine `whether the district court correctly applied the law and if, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, there are no genuine issues of material fact.'" Government of Guam v. United States, 179 F.3d 630, 632 (9th Cir. 1999) (citing Margolis v. Ryan, 140 F.3d 850, 852 (9th Cir.1998)). 6 When reviewing an agency's construction of a statute it is charged with admin…
citing Margolis v. Ryan, 140 F.3d 850, 852 (9th Cir.1998)
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo “to determine ‘whether the district court correctly applied the law and if, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, there are no genuine issues of material fact.’ ” Government of Guam v. United States, 179 F.3d 630, 632 (9th Cir.1999) (citing Margolis v. Ryan, 140 F.3d 850, 852 (9th Cir.1998)).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Auth. v. United States, 179 F.3d 630, 638 (9th Cir.1999), EIEG argues that Congress' silence on the matter in the FSIA displays Congress' intent not to provide foreign states with a right of post-joinder removal to federal court. 83 EIEG points specifically to two provisions of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Auth. v. United States, 179 F.3d 630, 638 (9th Cir.1999), EIEG argues that Congress’ silence on the matter in the FSIA displays Congress’ intent not to provide foreign states with a right of post-joinder removal to federal court.
Quote Authority · 9th Cir.
Auth. v. United States, 179 F.3d 630, 634 (9th Cir. 1999) ("This court generally refuses to interpret a statute in a way that renders a provision superfluous."), as amended, 1999 WL 604218 (9th Cir. Aug. 12, 1999).
"This court generally refuses to interpret a statute in a way that renders a provision superfluous."
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Auth. v. United States, 179 F.3d 630, 638 (9th Cir.1999) (stating that, when Congress includes a provision in one statute but not in another, the court must give effect to the difference in wording), as amended, 1999 WL 604218 (9th Cir. Aug.12, 1999).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Auth. v. United States, 179 F.3d 630, 634 (9th Cir.1999) (“This court generally refuses to interpret a statute in a way that renders a provision superfluous.”), as amended, 1999 WL 604218 (9th Cir. Aug.12, 1999).
Rule Authority · E.D. Cal.
Auth. v. United States, 179 F.3d 630, 634 (9th Cir. 16 1999)); NRDC II at 1206 (“[a] court must give effect to every 17 word or term in an NPDES permit and reject none as meaningless or 18 surplusage”) (quoting In re Crystal Props., Ltd., 268 F.3d 743 , 19 748 (9th Cir. 2001)) (alterations adopted). 20 Browner does not support defendants’ interpretation of 21 Provision B.3.
Rule Authority · Tex.
Auth. v. United States, 179 F.3d 630, 635 (9th Cir. 1999); see also Hoffman v. Hunt, 126 F.3d 575, 582 (4th Cir. 1997) (interpreting state statutory proviso that began, “[t]his section shall not prohibit [certain activities]” as “[b]y its terms, . . . prohibit[ing] nothing; rather, it serves as a rule of construction . . . . designed to assure that the . . . statute is not construed to reach” particular conduct); Hammerman & Gainer, Inc. v. Bullock, 791 S.W.2d 330, 333 (Tex.…
Rule Authority · N.D. Cal.
Moench’s interpretation of section 404 thus violates the axiom that “court[s] generally refus[e] to interpret a statute in a way that renders a provision superfluous.” Government of Guam v. U.S., 179 F.3d 630, 634 (9th Cir.1999).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Government of Guam v. United States, 179 F.3d 630, 632 (9th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1017 , 120 S.Ct. 1416 , 146 L.Ed.2d 309 (2000).