How cited: Jemmott v. Coughlin · Go Syfert

Jemmott v. Coughlin (1996)

green · 102 citation events across 14 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199620112026
green Raspardo v. Carlone (2014)
Rule Authority · 2d Cir. · 4 citations in this opinion
Immediate appeal is available from fact-related rulings “as long as the defendant can support an immunity defense on stipulated facts, facts accepted for purposes of the appeal, or the plaintiffs version of the facts that the district judge deemed available for jury resolution.” Id. at 90 ; see also Terebesi, 764 F.3d at 228-29 , 2014 WL 4099309, at *7 ; Poe, 282 F.3d at 132 ; Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 65-66 (2d Cir.1996).
Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.
Dep’t. of Corr., 243 F.3d 452 , 455 (8th Cir. 2001); Watkins v. Bowden, 105 F.3d 1344 , 1355 n.19 (11th Cir. 1997); Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir. 1996); Beardsley v. Webb, 30 F.3d 524, 529 (4th Cir. 1994); Bator v. Hawaii, 39 F.3d 1021 , 1027–28 (9th Cir. 1994); Boutros v. Canton Reg’l Transit Auth., 997 F.2d 198 , 202–04 (6th Cir. 1993) (overruled on other grounds by Harris, 510 U.S. at 17 ).
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
It is true that we have previously observed that “[m]ost of the core substantive standards that apply to claims of discriminatory conduct in violation of Title VII are also applicable to claims of discrimination in employment in violation of ... the Equal Protection Clause.” Patterson, 375 F.3d at 225; see also Annis v. Cnty. of Westchester, 136 F.3d 239, 245 (2d Cir.1998); Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir.1996).
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
“There is no respondeat superior liability under § 1983.” Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir.1996).
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
See Patterson v. County of Oneida, 375 F.3d 206, 225 (2d Cir.2004) (“A Title VII plaintiff is not precluded from bringing a concurrent § 1983 cause of action ... so long as the § 1983 claim is based on a distinct violation of a constitutional right.” (internal quotation marks omitted)); Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir.1996) (noting that “ § 1983 is used as a parallel remedy with Title VII in a discrimination suit [as] the elements of the substantive cause of acti…
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
See Patterson v. County of Oneida, 375 F.3d 206, 225 (2d Cir.2004) (“A Title VII plaintiff is not precluded from bringing a concurrent § 1983 cause of action ... so long as the § 1983 claim is based on a distinct violation of a constitutional right.” (internal quotation marks omitted)); Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir.1996) (noting that “ § 1983 is used as a parallel remedy with Title VII in a discrimination suit [as] the elements of the substantive cause of acti…
green Feingold v. New York (2004)
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
See Annis v. County of Westchester, 136 F.3d 239, 245 (2d Cir.1998) ("In analyzing whether conduct was unlawfully discriminatory for purposes of § 1983, we borrow the burden-shifting framework of Title VII claims."); Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir.1996) (stating that "Title VII law... is utilized by courts considering § 1983 Equal Protection claims" and recognizing that "several circuits have held that, when § 1983 is used as a parallel remedy with Title VII in …
green Feingold v. New York (2004)
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
See Annis v. County of Westchester, 136 F.3d 239, 245 (2d Cir.1998) (“In analyzing whether conduct was unlawfully discriminatory for purposes of § 1983, we borrow the burden-shifting framework of Title VII claims.”); Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir.1996) (stating that “Title VII law ... is utilized by courts considering § 1983 Equal Protection claims” and recognizing that “several circuits have held that, when § 1983 is used as a parallel remedy with Title VII in…
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
See Annis v. County of Westchester, 136 F.3d 239, 245 (2d Cir.1998); Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir. 1996).
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
See Annis v. County of Westchester, 136 F.3d 239, 245 (2d Cir.1998); Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir. 1996).
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
Because established law clearly prohibits hostile work environments based on race, see Whidbee v. Garzarelli Food Specialties, Inc., 223 F.3d 62, 68-69 (2d Cir. 2000), and plainly recognizes supervisory responsibility to remedy reported racial discrimination, Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir.1996); Colon v. Coughlin, 58 F.3d 865, 873 (2d Cir.1995), the individual defendants cannot claim that it was objectively reasonable for them to believe that the deliberate cre…
Rule Authority · 1st Cir.
When a plaintiff attempts to use § 1983 as a parallel remedy to a Title VII claim, the prima facie elements to establish liability are the same under both statutes. 7 Lipsett v. Univ. of Puerto Rico, 864 F.2d 881, 898 (1st Cir. 1988); Morris v. Oldham County Fiscal Court, 201 F.3d 784, 794 (6th Cir.2000); Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir.1996) (noting that courts commonly apply Title VII law when analyzing § 1983 equal protection claims).
Rule Authority · 1st Cir.
When a plaintiff attempts to use § 1983 as a parallel remedy to a Title VII claim, the prima facie elements to establish liability are the same under both statutes. 7 Lipsett v. Univ. of Puerto Rico, 864 F.2d 881, 898 (1st Cir.1988); Morris v. Oldham County Fiscal Court, 201 F.3d 784, 794 (6th Cir.2000); Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir.1996) (noting that courts commonly apply Title VII law when analyzing § 1983 equal protection claims).
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
See Connell v. Signoracci, 153 F.3d 74, 80 (2d Cir. 1998); Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 66 (2d Cir. 1996).
green Charles W. v. Maul (2000)
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
See Connell v. Signoracci, 153 F.3d 74, 80 (2d Cir. 1998); Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 66 (2d Cir.1996).
green Lee v. Sandberg (1997)
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
A brief review of our qualified immunity standard is necessary to explain our decision on the jurisdictional issue; The qualified immunity defense is intended to “strike a fair balance between (1) the need to provide a realistic avenue for vindication of constitutional guarantees, and (2) the need to protect public officials who are required to exercise their discretion and the related public interest in encouraging the vigorous exercise of official authority.” Jemmott v. Co…
green Lee v. Sandberg (1997)
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
A brief review of our qualified immunity standard is necessary to explain our decision on the jurisdictional issue. 22 The qualified immunity defense is intended to "strike a fair balance between (1) the need to provide a realistic avenue for vindication of constitutional guarantees, and (2) the need to protect public officials who are required to exercise their discretion and the related public interest in encouraging the vigorous exercise of official authority." Jemmott v.…
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 524 , 105 S.Ct. 2806, 2814 , 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985); Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 66 (2d Cir.1996).
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 524 , 105 S.Ct. 2806, 2814 , 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985); Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 66 (2d Cir.1996).
green Wilson v. Meeks (1996)
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 66 (2d Cir.1996) (“For the purpose of this appeal, however, the defendants are not contesting the sufficiency of plaintiffs proof, or the district court’s ruling that disputed issues of fact require the denial of their summary judgment motion.
Rule Authority · Me. · 2 citations in this opinion
The First Circuit has interpreted Johnson and Behrens to permit a defendant who has been denied a summary judgment due to the existence of an issue of fact to "concede[] arguendo the facts found to be disputed ... [and] tak[e] an interlocutory appeal on a legal claim that the defendant is nevertheless entitled to qualified immunity on facts not controverted." Berthiaume v. Caron, 142 F.3d 12, 15 (1st Cir. 1998); accord Vance v. Nunnery, 137 F.3d 270 , 273 & n. 2 (5th Cir.199…
Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y
The relevant standards applicable to Title VII claims, discussed supra, also apply to Section 1983 equal protection claims.13 See, e.g., Patterson v. County of Oneida, N.Y., 375 F.3d 206, 225 (2d Cir. 2004) (citing Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir. 1996)).
Rule Authority · W.D.N.Y.
But—as the defendants observe in their opposition—“[t]here is no respondeat superior liability under [section] 1983.” Docket Item 47 at 4 (citing Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir. 1996)); see Monell, 436 U.S. at 691 (“[W]e conclude that a municipality cannot be held liable solely because it employs a tortfeasor—or, in other words, a municipality cannot be held liable under [section] 1983 on a respondeat superior theory.”); Reynolds v. Giuliani, 506 F.3d 183, 191 (…
Rule Authority · N.D.N.Y.
“The doctrine [of qualified immunity] is intended to strike a fair balance between (1) the need to provide a realistic avenue for vindication of constitutional guarantees, and (2) the need to protect public officials who are required to exercise their discretion and the related public interest in encouraging the vigorous exercise of official authority.” Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 66 (2d Cir. 1996) (interior quotation marks and 13 citations omitted).
interior quotation marks and 13 citations omitted
Rule Authority · N.D.N.Y.
“The doctrine [of qualified immunity] is intended to strike a fair balance between (1) the need to provide a realistic avenue for vindication of constitutional guarantees, and (2) the need to protect public officials who are required to exercise their discretion and the related public interest in encouraging the vigorous exercise of official authority.” Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 66 (2d Cir. 1996)(interior quotation marks and citations omitted).
interior quotation marks and citations omitted
green Myers v. Doherty (2021)
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Once action under color of state law is established,’ an “equal protection claim parallels” a Title VII claim: “The elements of one are generally the same as the elements of the other and the two must stand or fall together.” Feingold v. New York, 366 F.3d 138, 159 (2d Cir. 2004) (citing Annis v. Cnty. of Westchester, 136 F.3d 239, 245 (2d Cir. 1998) (“In analyzing whether conduct was unlawfully discriminatory for purposes of § 1983, we borrow the burden-shifting framework o…
Rule Authority · W.D.N.Y.
Third Cause of Action: Monell Claim and Violation of the New York State Constitution against the City of Canandaigua It is well established that “[t]here is no respondeat superior liability under §1983.” Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir. 1996).
Quote Authority · E.D.N.Y · signal: see also
Szewczyk v. Saakian, 774 F. App’x 37 , 38 (2d Cir. 2019) (“Claims of national origin, religion, and age discrimination under the NYSHRL are analyzed under the same standards as Title VII . . . claims.” (citing Spiegel v. Schulmann, 604 F.3d 72, 80 (2d Cir. 2010))); see also Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir. 1996) (“[W]hen § 1983 is used as a parallel remedy with Title VII in a discrimination suit, as it is here, the elements of the substantive cause of action are …
“[W]hen § 1983 is used as a parallel remedy with Title VII in a discrimination suit, as it is here, the elements of the substantive cause of action are the same under both statutes.”
Quote Authority · E.D.N.Y
Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir. 1996) (“[W]hen § 1983 is used as a parallel remedy with Title VII in a discrimination suit, as it is here, the elements of the substantive cause of action are the same under both statutes.”).
“[W]hen § 1983 is used as a parallel remedy with Title VII in a discrimination suit, as it is here, the elements of the substantive cause of action are the same under both statutes.”
Rule Authority · W.D.N.Y.
With respect to plaintiff’s claims against the City of Rochester, it is well established that “[t]here is no respondeat superior liability under §1983.” Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir. 1996).
Quote Authority · E.D.N.Y
"Most of the core substantive standards that apply to claims of discriminatory conduct in violation of Title VII are also applicable to claims of discrimination in employment in violation of [ ] [ ] the Equal Protection Clause ...." Patterson v. Cty. of Oneida, N.Y. , 375 F.3d 206 , 225 (2d Cir. 2004) (citing Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61 , 67 (2d Cir. 1996) ("[W]hen § 1983 is used as a parallel remedy with Title VII in a discrimination suit, as it is here, the elements of…
"[W]hen § 1983 is used as a parallel remedy with Title VII in a discrimination suit, as it is here, the elements of the substantive cause of action are the same under both statutes."
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Office, 82 Fed.Appx. 254, 256 (2d Cir. 2003) (“[Defendants cannot claim that it was objectively reasonable for them to believe that the deliberate creation of a racially hostile work environment or supervisors’ failure to remedy it did not violate clearly established federal law.”); Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 68 (2d Cir. 1996) (denying qualified immunity to supervisors on basis of race-based hostile work environment).
denying qualified immunity to supervisors on basis of race-based hostile work environment
green Burhans v. Lopez (2014)
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Feingold v. New York, 366 F.3d 138, 159 (2d Cir.2004); Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir.1996).
Rule Authority · W.D.N.Y.
Failure to Train and Similar Claims Against the Town “There is no respondeat superior liability under § 1983.” Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir.1996).
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
See, e.g., Patterson, 375 F.3d at 225 ; see also Whidbee v. Garzarelli Food Specialties, Inc., 223 F.3d 62, 69 (2d Cir.2000) (§ 1981); Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir. 1996) (§ 1983); Sorlucco v. New York City Police Department, 888 F.2d 4, 6-7 (2d Cir.1989) (same).
§ 1983
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
To succeed on an Equal Protection claim, as under Title VII, Plaintiff must show “that the defendant acted with intent to discriminate.” United States v. Yonkers Bd. of Educ., 837 F.2d at 1216; Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 68 (2d Cir.1996) (citing Arlington Heights v. Metro.
Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y
See Annis v. County of Westchester, 136 F.3d 239, 245 (2d Cir.1998) (“In analyzing whether conduct was unlawfully discriminatory for purposes of § 1983, we borrow the burden-shifting framework of Title VII claims.”); Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir.1996) (observing that “Title VII law ... is utilized by courts considering § 1983 Equal Protection claims” and that “several circuits have held that, when § 1983 is used as a parallel remedy with Title VII in a discrim…
Rule Authority · N.D.N.Y.
Indeed, a hostile work environment claim brought under section 1983 is analyzed using ‘Title VII law.’ ” Cruz v. Liberatore, 582 F.Supp.2d 508, 516 (S.D.N.Y.2008) (citing Patterson v. County of Oneida, 375 F.3d 206, 226 (2d Cir.2004); Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir.1996)).
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
First, “when [section] 1983 is used as a parallel remedy with Title VII in a discrimination suit, as it is here, the elements of the substantive cause of action are the same under both statutes.” Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir.1996) (citing Risinger v. Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Comp., 883 F.2d 475, 483 (6th Cir.1989); Lipsett v. University of Puerto 864 F.2d 881, 898 (1st Cir.1988); Nilsen v. City of Moss Point, 701 F.2d 556 , 559 n. 3 (5th Cir.1983) (en banc)).
green Cruz v. Liberatore (2008)
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Indeed, a hostile work environment claim brought under section 1983 is analyzed using “Title VII law.” Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir.1996).
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Qualified Immunity The purpose of the qualified immunity doctrine is to “strike a fair balance between (1) the need to provide a realistic avenue for vindication of constitutional guarantees, and (2) the need to protect public officials who are required to exercise their discretion and the related public interest in encouraging the vigorous exercise of official authority.” Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 66 (2d Cir.1996) (internal citations and quotations omitted).
Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y
The court further noted that, to sustain an equal protection claim, plaintiff would have to prove that defendants "intentionally discriminated against him based on his race.” Id. at 68.
Rule Authority
See Connell v. Signoracci, 153 F.3d 74, 80 (2d Cir.1998); Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 66 (2d Cir.1996).
Rule Authority
See Connell v. Signoracci, 153 F.3d 74, 80 (2d Cir. 1998); Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 66 (2d Cir. 1996). 20 The sole issue presented for review is whether the Town Board members are entitled to qualified immunity on appellants' § 1983 Equal Protection claim.
green Carson v. Lewis (1999)
Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y
Qualified immunity attempts to “strike a fair balance between (1) the need to provide a realistic avenue for vindication of constitutional guarantees, and (2) the need to protect public officials who are required to exercise their discretion and the related public interest in encouraging the vigorous exercise of official authority.” Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 66 (2d Cir.1996) (internal quotations and citations omitted).
green Wright v. Coughlin (1998)
Rule Authority · W.D.N.Y.
Monell v. Dep’t of Social Serv., 436 U.S. 658 , 98 S.Ct. 2018 , 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978); Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir.1996); Al-Jundi v. Estate of Rockefeller, 885 F.2d 1060, 1065-66 (2d Cir.1989); Villante v. Dep’t of Corrections, 786 F.2d 516, 519 (2d Cir.1986); Bolanos v. Coughlin, 1993 WL 762112 , *24 (S.D.N.Y.1993).
Rule Authority · N.D.N.Y.
Dist, 491 U.S. 701, 735-36 , 109 S.Ct. 2702 , 105 L.Ed.2d 598 (1989); Terminate Control Corp. v. Horowitz, 28 F.3d 1335, 1348 (2d Cir.1994); Huff v. West Haven Bd. of Educ., 10 F.Supp.2d 117, 121 (D.Conn.1998); Zappala v. Albicelli, 980 F.Supp. 635, 638-39 (N.D.N.Y.1997). 15 .Plaintiffs claims, when viewed in the aggregate, are indicative of an employee dissatisfied with his prospects for advancement in the District and not a workplace "permeated with discriminatory intimida…
green DeRosa v. Bell (1998)
Rule Authority · D. Conn.
“The qualified immunity defense is intended to ‘strike a fair balance between (1) the need to provide a realistic avenue for vindication of constitutional guarantees, and (2) the need to protect public officials who are required to exercise their discretion and the related public interest in encouraging the vigorous exercise of official authority.’ ” Lee v. Sandberg, 136 F.3d 94, 100 (2d Cir.1997) (quoting Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 66 (2d Cir.1996)).
Rule Authority · D. Kan.
See Watkins v. Bowden, 105 F.3d 1344, 1355 (11th Cir.1997); Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir.1996).
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Harris , 510 U.S. at .21, 114 S.Ct. at 370 ; Jemmott v. Coughlin, 85 F.3d 61, 67 (2d Cir.1996). 19.Finally, it need be noted that a hostile or abusive environment is not actionable under Title VII unless the alleged conduct “was caused by discriminatory animus.” Jemmott, 85 F.3d at 67 . 20.