Wilson v. City Of New York (1996)

green · 33 citation events across 7 courts. Showing the 18 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 18

Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

199620112026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green In Re: World Trade Ctr. Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litig. (2014)

Rule Authority · 2d Cir.

A defendant is liable under § 241(6) if ʺthe defendant violated a safety regulation that set forth a specific standard of conduct, and . . . the violation was the proximate cause of [plaintiffʹs] injuries.ʺ Wilson v. City of New York, 89 F.3d 32, 38 (2d Cir. 1996). 2.

green In Re: World Trade Ctr. Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litig. (2014)

Rule Authority · 2d Cir.

green Markut v. Verizon New York Inc. (2014)

Rule Authority · 2d Cir.

A defendant is liable under § 241(6) if “the defendant violated a safety regulation that set forth a specific standard of conduct, and ... the violation was the proximate cause of [plaintiffs] injuries.” Wilson v. City of New York, 89 F.3d 32, 38 (2d Cir.1996). 2.

green Lubrano v. Waterman Steamship Co. (1999)

Rule Authority · 2d Cir. · signal: cf.

Cf. Wilson v. City of New York, 89 F.3d 32, 36 (2d Cir.1996); Wanser v. Long island R.R.

green Lubrano v. Waterman Steamship Company (1999)

Rule Authority · 2d Cir. · signal: cf.

Cf. Wilson v. City of New York, 89 F.3d 32, 36 (2d Cir.1996); Wanser v. Long Island R.R.

green Dos Santos v. Terrace Place Realty, Inc. (2006)

Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y. · 3 citations in this opinion

Wilson v. City of New York, 89 F.3d 32, 35 (2d Cir.1996).

green Kepner v. FEDERAL NAT. MORTG. ASS'N (2002)

Rule Authority · N.D.N.Y. · 2 citations in this opinion

Further, the act of re-keying a functioning, existing lock does not constitute a "repair" or "alteration." See Wilson v. City of New York, 89 F.3d 32, 37 (2d Cir.1996); Joblon v. Solow, 91 N.Y.2d 457, 465 , 672 N.Y.S.2d 286 , 695 N.E.2d 237 (1998) (stating that "alteration" is a significant physical change to the configuration or composition of the building or structure).

green Kepner v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n (2002)

Rule Authority · N.D.N.Y. · 2 citations in this opinion

Further, the act of re-keying a functioning, existing lock does not constitute a “repair” or “alteration.” See Wilson v. City of New York, 89 F.3d 32, 37 (2d Cir.1996); Joblon v. Solow, 91 N.Y.2d 457, 465 , 672 N.Y.S.2d 286 , 695 N.E.2d 237 (1998) (stating that “alteration” is a significant physical change to the configuration or composition of the building or structure).

green Auclair v. Corning Incorporated (2024)

Rule Authority · N.D.N.Y.

The Second Circuit has highlighted this distinction by stating that "[w]hile § 240(1) refers to workers 'repairing' a structure, it does not use the terms 'maintaining' or 'maintenance.'" Wilson v. City of New York, 89 F.3d 32, 36-37 (2d Cir. 1996).

green Laverty v. Dobco, Inc. (2024)

Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.

Servs. of N.Y.C., Inc., 1 N.Y.3d 280 , 287–89 (2003). 26 See also Wilson v. City of New York, 89 F.3d 32, 36 (2d Cir. 1996); Blake, 1 N.Y.3d at 287 . 27 See also Blake, 1 N.Y.3d at 287 . 28 See also Rocovich v. Consol.

green Suazo v. Ocean Network Express (North America), Inc. (2023)

Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.

Liability requires that a defendant “had actual or constructive notice of the condition complained of and exercised supervision or control over the work performed by the plaintiff.” Id. (citing Wilson v. City of New York, 89 F.3d 32, 28 (2d Cir. 1996)).

green Corrales-Patino v. Procida Construction Corp. (2021)

Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.

green Krafcsik v. Egnatia Construction Inc. (2021)

Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.

Section 240(1) was designed “to provide protection for workers who are subjected to elevation-related risks . . . [and] the statute achieves this by imposing absolute responsibility for safety practices on owners, general contractors, and their agents, instead of on the workers themselves.” Wilson v. City of New York, 89 F.3d 32, 36 (2d Cir. 1996).

green Pollack v. Safeway Steel Products, Inc. (2006)

Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.

“The purpose of this section is to provide protection for workers who are subjected to elevation-related risks; the statute achieves this by imposing absolute responsibility for safety practices on owners, general contractors, and their agents, instead of on the workers themselves.” Wilson v. City of New York, 89 F.3d 32, 36 (2d Cir.1996).

green McNeight v. Railcar Custom Leasing, LLC (2009)

Cited (see also) · 2d Cir. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Wilson v. City of New York, 89 F.3d 32, 39 (2d Cir.1996).

green McNeight v. Railcar Custom Leasing, LLC (2009)

Cited (see also) · 2d Cir. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Wilson v. City of New York, 89 F.3d 32, 39 (2d Cir.1996).

green Wojcik v. 42nd Street Development Project, Inc. (2005)

Cited (see also) · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see also

See also Wilson v. City of New York, 89 F.3d 32, 38 (2d Cir.1996) ("An *458 owner is not liable under § 200 unless it had actual or constructive notice of the condition complained of and exercised supervision or control over the work performed by the plaintiff.”) (internal quotations and citations omitted) (emphasis added); Boyette v. Algonquin Gas Transmission Co., 952 F.Supp. 192 , 195 — 198 (S.D.N.Y.1997) (holding that knowledge of an unsafe condition, without proof of su…

green Shannon v. Lake Grove Centers, Inc. (2000)

Cited (see also) · E.D.N.Y · signal: see also

Felker v. Corning, Inc., 90 N.Y.2d 219, 221 , 660 N.Y.S.2d 349, 351 , 682 N.E.2d 950 (1997); Zimmer, 65 N.Y.2d at 524 , 493 N.Y.S.2d at 107 , 482 N.E.2d 898 ; Serpe v. Eyris Productions, Inc., 243 A.D.2d 375, 376 , 663 N.Y.S.2d 542, 544 (1st Dept.1997); see also Wilson v. City of New York, 89 F.3d 32, 36 (2d Cir.1996).