How cited: Pruett v. Colvin · Go Syfert

Pruett v. Colvin (2015)

green · 9 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 6 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green Allen v. Saul (2020)
Quote Authority · S.D. Cal. · 2 citations in this opinion
No. 19 at 7-8. 24 However, the ALJ’s failure to reconcile an apparent conflict is not harmless precisely 25 because it is difficult if not impossible to determine from the record “whether substantial 26 evidence supports the ALJ’s five-step finding that [the claimant] could perform [the] 27 work.” Zavalin, 778 F.3d at 848 (second alteration in original); see also Lamear, 865 28 F.3d at 1206 (noting the “absen[ce] [of] anything in the record to explain th[e] apparent 1 discre…
“The ALJ’s 2 failure to do so may preclude the Court from determining whether the ALJ’s decision is 3 supported by substantial evidence.”
green Downey v. O' Malley (2025)
Rule Authority · S.D. Cal.
Furthermore, the 17 Commissioner’s decision, even if erroneous, may not be reversed if the error is harmless. 18 Pruett v. Colvin, 85 F. Supp. 3d 1152, 1157 (N.D.
Quote Authority · E.D. Cal.
The VE’s testimony cannot constitute substantial evidence in such 3 circumstances . . . and the ALJ’s finding at Step 4 was premised on nothing else.”); Pruett v. 4 Colvin, 85 F.Supp.3d 1152, 1158 (N.D.
“Here, because the ALJ did not question the 5 vocational expert concerning the apparent conflict between the vocational expert’s testimony and 6 the DOT, there is no evidence in the record that plaintiff can perform the light work required of a 7 small products assembler.”
green Henderson v. Saul (2021)
Rule Authority · S.D. Cal.
Specifically, the Court is 21 unable to determine from the record “whether substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s five- 22 step finding that [the claimant] could perform [the] work.” Zavalin, 778 F.3d at 848 ; see 23 also Lamear, 865 F.3d at 1206 (noting the absence of “anything in the record to explain 24 th[e] apparent discrepancy”); Pruett v. Colvin, 85 F. Supp. 3d 1152, 1158 (N.D.
green Quesada v. Saul (2020)
Rule Authority · S.D. Cal.
Furthermore, the 7 Commissioner’s decision, even if erroneous, may not be reversed if the error is harmless. 8 Pruett v. Colvin, 85 F. Supp. 3d 1152, 1157 (N.D.
green SNIDER v. SAUL (2019)
Rule Authority · M.D.N.C.
Sept. 26, 2016) (unpublished); Pruett v. Colvin, 85 F. Supp. 3d 1152, 1162 (N.D.