Zinner v. Olenych (2015)
green
· 13 citation events
across 6 courts.
Showing the 7 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Kathy Livingston v. Nicholas Kehagias (2020)
See Zinner v. Olenych, 108 F. Supp. 3d 369, 398 (E.D.
“Typically, courts will not consider an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief.”
green
Jonathan Carr v. Mississippi Lottery Corporation (2022)
Zinner v. Olenych, 108 F. Supp. 3d 369, 386-87 (E.D.
green
Moke America LLC v. American Custom Golf Cars, Inc. (2023)
“Generic marks lie at the least-protected end of the spectrum of distinctiveness because such marks can never serve as valid service marks.” Zinner v. Olenych, 108 F. Supp. 3d 369, 380 (E.D.
Davis, C.J.
green
The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Zhang (2021)
Va. 2000) (Factor VI favored mark holder where the cybersquatter expressed an interest in what the mark holder would “offer him”), aff’d, 263 F.3d 359, 369 ; Zinner v. Olenych, 108 F. Supp. 3d 369, 389 (E.D.
“The Court rejects Defendants’ argument that Mr. Fernandez’s statement that his client was ‘interested in selling [the edzinner.com] domain name’ cannot be construed as an ‘offer to sell’ the domain name.”
green
NextHome, Inc. v. Jenkins (2021)
Cybersquatting “Cybersquatting is the practice of registering ‘well-known brand names as Internet domain names’ in order to force the rightful owners of the marks ‘to pay for the right to engage in electronic commerce under their own brand name.’” Zinner v. Olenych, 108 F. Supp. 3d 369, 378 (E.D.
citing Virtual Works, Inc. v. Volkswagen of Am., Inc., 238 F.3d 264, 267 (4th Cir. 2001)
green
Wagner v. lindawagner.com (2016)
The ACPA To succeed on a claim under the ACPA, Wagner must prove all of the following elements: “(1) Defendants registered, trafficked in, or used a domain name; (2) that was identical or confusingly similar to a mark owned by Plaintiff; (3) that such mark was [registered, famous, or] distinctive at the time Defendants registered the domain name; and (4) Defendants did so with a bad faith intent to profit from such mark.” Zinner v. Olenych, 108 F.Supp.3d 369, 379 (E.D.Va.201…
green
Bulbs 4 East Side, Inc. v. Ricks (2016)
Evid. 408; Zinner v. Olenych, 108 F.Supp.3d 369, 391 (E.D.Va.2015).