How cited: Eat More Wings, LLC v. Home Mkt. Foods, Inc. · Go Syfert

Eat More Wings, LLC v. Home Mkt. Foods, Inc. (2017)

green · 29 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 11 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2019 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201920222026
Rule Authority · W.D. Ky. · 4 citations in this opinion
Foods, Inc., 282 F. Supp. 3d 965, 969 (E.D.
green Eitel v. PNC Bank, NA (2021)
Rule Authority · W.D. Ky. · 3 citations in this opinion
Foods, Inc., 282 F. Supp. 3d 965, 969 (E.D.
Rule Authority · E.D. Ky. · 2 citations in this opinion
The Sixth Circuit has held that the "use of the word 'any' ... establishes that even the slightest transaction is sufficient to bring a corporation within [the forum's] long-arm jurisdiction. " Eat More Wings , 282 F.Supp.3d at 969 (alteration and emphasis in original) (quoting Beydoun v. Wataniya Rests.
alteration and emphasis in original
Rule Authority · W.D. Ky.
Foods, Inc., 282 F. Supp. 3d 965, 969-70 (E.D.
alterations in original
green Tew v. MCML Limited (2024)
Quote Authority · E.D. Ky.
Foods, Inc., 282 F. Supp. 3d 965 , 969–70 (E.D.
“Making phone calls, sending facsimiles, sending e-mails, letters or other communications, standing alone, ‘may be sufficient to confer jurisdiction on the foreign defendant where the phone calls and faxes form the bases for the action.’”
Rule Authority · W.D. Ky.
Foods, Inc., 282 F. Supp. 3d 965, 969 (E.D.
alteration and emphasis in original
Rule Authority · E.D. Ky.
Foods, Inc., 282 F. Supp. 3d 965, 969 (E.D.
Rule Authority · E.D. Ky.
Foods, Inc., 282 F. Supp. 3d 965, 970 (E.D.
Rule Authority · E.D. Ky.
Foods, Inc., to stand for the proposition that “even the slightest transaction is sufficient [under KRS 454.210(2)(a)(1)] … to bring a corporation within [the forum’s] long- arm jurisdiction.” 282 F.Supp.3d 965, 969 (E.D.
quoting Beydoun v. Wataniya Rests. Holding, Q.S.C., 768 F.3d 499 , 504–05 (6th Cir. 2015)
Rule Authority · W.D. Ky.
Foods, Inc., 282 F. Supp. 3d 965, 970 (E.D.
finding that the defendant transacted business in Kentucky when he “sent emails to [plaintiff], knowing that he was in Kentucky, asking him to send samples and instructions for his products, which [plaintiff] fulfilled from Kentucky”
Cited · E.D. Ky. · signal: see
See Eat More Wings, 282 F. Supp. 3d at 969-70 .