McClure v. Parvis (2018)
green
· 11 citation events
across 6 courts.
Showing the 9 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Paul E. Sparkman, Sr., individually and as administrator of the Estate of Paul E. Sparkman, Jr. v. Potter Cou… (2025)
Ct. 2001) (holding that “constructive notice must be imposed when the failure … is caused by the absence of supervision.”). 73 McClure v. Parvis, 294 F. Supp. 3d 318, 329 (E.D.
green
Benson v. BBH WBMC LLC (2025)
See McClure v. Parvis, 294 F. Supp. 3d 318, 326 (E.D.
“Symptoms like vomiting and vision problems, in isolation, may not constitute an emergency medical condition.”
green
KOVALEV v. NAZARETH HOSPITAL (2024)
In order “to state an EMTALA failure-to-screen claim, the plaintiff must allege that: (1) the patient had an emergency medical condition; and (2) the hospital did not screen the patient in the same way it screens other patients presenting with similar symptoms.” McClure v. Parvis, 294 F. Supp. 3d 318, 324 (E.D.
Plaintiff fails to allege a plausible failure to screen claim under EMTALA. 28 To state a claim that Defendant failed to properly screen a patient under requirements of 1 EMTALA, Plaintiff must allege that: “(1) the patient had an emergency medical condition; and (2) 2 the hospital did not screen the patient in the same way it screens other patients presenting with 3 similar symptoms.” McClure v. Parvis, 294 F.Supp.3d 318, 324 (E.D Pa. 2018).
green
FOSTER v. KLASKO (2020)
See McClure, 294 F. Supp. 3d at 325 (citing Brooks v. Maryland Gen.
green
ALTOMARE v. United States (2025)
Id. (quoting Thompson, 591 A.2d at 707 ); see also McClure v. Parvis, 294 F. Supp. 3d 318, 327 (E.D.
corporate negligence can also attach “to certain non-hospital entities” such as HMOs and nursing homes
See Scampone v. Highland Park Care Ctr., 57 A.3d 582, 604-06 (Pa. 2012); see also McClure v. Parvis, 294 F. Supp. 3d 318, 326-29 (E.D.
Savage J.
green
FOSTER v. KLASKO (2020)
Arkadelphia, 91 F.3d 1132, 1138 (8th Cir. 1996)); see also McClure v. Parvis, 294 F. Supp. 3d 318, 324 (E.D.
explaining that “to state an EMTALA failure-to-screen claim, the plaintiff must allege that: (1) the patient had an emergency medical condition; and (2) the hospital did not screen the patient in the same way it screens other patients presenting with similar symptoms”
green
Cervantes v. Tenet Hosps. Ltd. (2019)
See McClure v. Parvis , 294 F.Supp.3d 318 , 322-23 (E.D.
holding that patient's EMTALA screening-delay and negligence claims both survived though defendant hospital correctly diagnosed patient