Coscarelli v. Esquared Hospitality LLC (2019)
green
· 50 citation events
across 5 courts.
Showing the 36 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2019 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201920222026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Doe 1 v. The College Board (2020)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 215 (S.D.N.Y. 2019).
green
CCM Touring LLC v. Moonbug Entertainment LTD (2025)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 221 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 221 (S.D.N.Y. 2019).1 To show irreparable harm, the movant must demonstrate an injury that is neither remote nor speculative, but actual and imminent and that cannot be remedied by an award of monetary damages.” Oliver v. N.Y.
green
Ramos v. Department of Homeless Services (2022)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 221 (S.D.N.Y. 2019).
green
Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties (2021)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 215 (S.D.N.Y. 2019). “[T]he FAA creates a body of federal substantive law of arbitrability, applicable to any arbitration agreement within the coverage of the Act,” but “in evaluating whether the parties have entered into a valid arbitration agreement, the court must look to state law principles.” Cap Gemini Ernst & Young, U.S., L.L.C. v. Nackel, 346 F.3d 360, 364 (2d Cir. 2003).
green
Galli v. PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP (2020)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 215 (S.D.N.Y. 2019).
green
Galli v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Notice/Severance Policy As Amended and Restated Effective February 1, 2011 (2020)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 215 (S.D.N.Y. 2019).
green
Lesser v. TIAA Bank, FSB (2020)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 215 (S.D.N.Y. 2019).
green
Alexandra Fiallos, as Parent and Natural Guardian of L.V., and Alexandra Fiallos, individually v. Melissa Avi… (2025)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 221 (S.D.N.Y. 2019), it will touch on them briefly for the sake of the record.
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 220 (S.D.N.Y. 2019).
green
Hao Zhe Wang v. Bank of America Corporation, et al. (2025)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 221 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (“Thus, if a party fails to show irreparable harm, a court need not [] address the remaining elements.”); Procter & Gamble Co. v. Ultreo, Inc., 574 F. Supp. 2d 339, 344 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) (“A moving party must demonstrate that irreparable injury. . . is likely before any other requirement for the issuance of an injunction may be considered.”).
“Thus, if a party fails to show irreparable harm, a court need not [] address the remaining elements.”
green
Skiboky Stora v. The City of New York, et al. (2025)
Preliminary injunctions are “‘an extraordinary remedy never awarded as of right.’” Coscarelli v. ESquared Hospitality LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 221 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (quoting Winter v. Nat.
quoting Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008)
green
Vickie M. Stringer v. Simon & Schuster, Inc. (2025)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 222 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (quoting Tough Traveler, Ltd. v. Outbound Prods., 60 F.3d 964, 968 (2d Cir. 1995) (“[D]elay, ‘standing alone,’ may ‘preclude the granting of preliminary injunctive relief’ ” because it “suggests that there is, in fact, no irreparable injury.”).
quoting Tough Traveler, Ltd. v. Outbound Prods., 60 F.3d 964, 968 (2d Cir. 1995) (“[D]elay, ‘standing alone,’ may ‘preclude the granting of preliminary injunctive relief’ ” because it “suggests that there is, in fact, no irreparable injury.”
green
Crane Enterprises, LLC v. Crane (2025)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 222 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (courts “must consider a plaintiff’s delay in seeking relief when analyzing whether the plaintiff will suffer irreparable harm”) (internal quotation marks omitted).
courts “must consider a plaintiff’s delay in seeking relief when analyzing whether the plaintiff will suffer irreparable harm”
green
Stringer v. SIMON & SCHUSTER, INC (2025)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 222 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (quoting Tough Traveler, Ltd. v. Outbound Prods., 60 F.3d 964, 968 (2d Cir. 1995) (“[D]elay, ‘standing alone,’ may ‘preclude the granting of preliminary injunctive relief” because it “suggests that there is, in fact, no irreparable injury.’).
quoting Tough Traveler, Ltd. v. Outbound Prods., 60 F.3d 964, 968 (2d Cir. 1995) (“[D]elay, ‘standing alone,’ may ‘preclude the granting of preliminary injunctive relief” because it “suggests that there is, in fact, no irreparable injury.’
green
Newsome v. The New York City Family Court (2025)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 221 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (“[I]f a party fails to show irreparable harm, a court need not even address the remaining elements [of the preliminary-injunction analysis].”).
“[I]f a party fails to show irreparable harm, a court need not even address the remaining elements [of the preliminary-injunction analysis].”
green
De Oliveira v. Tenet Healthcare (2025)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 221 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green
Kim v. CIMG Inc. (2025)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 222 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green
Ramos v. Department of Homeless Services (2024)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 221 (S.D.N.Y. 2019).
green
Torres v. MMS Group LLC (2024)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 222 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (citing Gidatex, S.r.L. v. Campaniello Imps., Ltd., 13 F. Supp. 2d 417, 419 (S.D.N.Y. 1998).
citing Gidatex, S.r.L. v. Campaniello Imps., Ltd., 13 F. Supp. 2d 417, 419 (S.D.N.Y. 1998). Here, the circumstances that Plaintiff complains of have persisted for years (or, in the case of the purportedly absent strobe lights, were addressed many years ago, see supra
See, e.g., Cuoco v. Moritsugu, 222 F.3d 99, 112 (2d Cir. 2000) (holding that a district court may dismiss without granting leave to amend where repleading would be “futile”); cf., e.g., Coscarelli v. ESquared Hospitality LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 221 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (dismissing claims under California law and granting leave to replead under New York law). contempt, hatred, ridicule, aversion or disgrace.” Davis v. Boeheim, 24 N.Y.3d 262, 268 (2014); Cousins v. Goodier, 283 A…
dismissing claims under California law and granting leave to replead under New York law
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 222 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (internal quotation marks omitted).
internal quotation marks omitted
green
Pak v. Albany Med Health System (2023)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 222 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (noting that courts in this Circuit typically decline to grant preliminary injunctions in the face of unexplained delays of more than two months). terminated, she will have an adequate remedy at law in the form of money damages and possibly reinstatement.® As it has been determined that Pak has failed to establish that she will be irreparably harmed in the absence of preliminary injunctive relief, the remaining requirements for t…
noting that courts in this Circuit typically decline to grant preliminary injunctions in the face of unexplained delays of more than two months
green
Kumaran v. National Futures Association (2023)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 221 (S.D.N.Y. 2019).
green
Kumaran v. ADM Investor Services, Inc. (2023)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 221 (S.D.N.Y. 2019).
green
Yu v. X Vision Technology Limited (2023)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 221 (S.D.N.Y. 2019).
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 221 (S.D.N.Y. 2019).
green
Roddey v. Infosys Technologies Limited, Inc. (2022)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 221 (S.D.N.Y. 2019).
green
Giddings v. Oanda Corp. (2022)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 221 (S.D.N.Y. 2019).
green
Coscarelli v. Esquared Hospitality LLC (2021)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 226 (S.D.N.Y. 2019), ECF No. 72.
green
SPIN MASTER, LTD. v. ACIPER (2020)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 221 (S.D.N.Y. 2019).
green
Executive Trim Construction Inc. v. Gross (2020)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 221 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) ("[I]f a party fails to show irreparable harm, a court need not even address the remaining elements" of the preliminary injunction standard).
"[I]f a party fails to show irreparable harm, a court need not even address the remaining elements" of the preliminary injunction standard
green
Intertek Testing Services, N.A., Inc. v. Pennisi (2020)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 221 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (“[I]f a party fails to show irreparable harm, a court need not even address the remaining elements” of the preliminary injunction standard).
“[I]f a party fails to show irreparable harm, a court need not even address the remaining elements” of the preliminary injunction standard
green
Griggs v. Kenworth of Montgomery, Inc. (2019)
Coscarelli v. ESquared Hospitality LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 215 (S.D.N.Y. 2019).
green
Carson Optical, Inc. v. Alista Corporation (2019)
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 221 (S.D.N.Y. 2019).
LLC, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 222 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (noting, in the preliminary injunction context, that “it is well established that a court must consider a plaintiff’s delay in seeking relief when analyzing whether the plaintiff will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of relief.” (internal quotation marks omitted)); Cassano, 189 F.R.D. at 86 (finding that there was “no excuse” for “waiting 12 days” to figure out what privileged document had been shared by mistake); cf. USI I…
noting, in the preliminary injunction context, that “it is well established that a court must consider a plaintiff’s delay in seeking relief when analyzing whether the plaintiff will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of relief.” (internal quotation marks omitted)