How cited: Nicopior v. Moshi Moshi Palm Grove, LLC · Go Syfert

Nicopior v. Moshi Moshi Palm Grove, LLC (2019)

green · 9 citation events across 5 courts. Showing the 7 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · S.D. Fla. · 2 citations in this opinion
Nicopior v. Moshi Moshi Palm Grove, LLC, 375 F. Supp. 3d 1278, 1282 (S.D.
alteration added; citation and quotation marks omitted
Rule Authority · D. Utah
Set-offs against back pay awards deprive the employee of the ‘cash in hand’ contemplated by the Act, and are therefore inappropriate in any proceeding brought to enforce the FLSA minimum wage and overtime provisions, whether the suit is initiated by individual employees or by the Secretary of Labor.”), overruled in part on other grounds, McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co., 486 U.S. 128 (1988)); Martin v. PepsiAmericas, Inc., 628 F.3d 738, 741 (5th Cir. 2010) (reaffirming the pr…
dismissing compulsory counterclaims in FLSA action because any recovery on them would run afoul of Brennan
green Kleiman v. Wright (2023)
Rule Authority · S.D. Fla.
“In determining if claims derive from a common nucleus of facts, the Court should ask whether the claims arise from the same facts or involve similar occurrences, witnesses, or evidence.” Nicopior v. Moshi Moshi Palm Grove, LLC, 375 F. Supp. 3d 1278, 1285 (S.D.
J. Torres
Quote Authority · M.D. Fla.
Nicopior v. Moshi Palm Grove, LLC, 375 F. Supp. 3d 1278, 1284 (S.D.
“There is no dispute that the [c]ourt has federal question jurisdiction over [the p]laintiffs’ FLSA claim.”
Quote Authority · M.D. Fla.
Nicopior v. Moshi Palm Grove, LLC, 375 F. Supp. 3d 1278, 1284 (S.D.
“There is no dispute that the [c]ourt has federal question jurisdiction over [the p]laintiffs’ FLSA claim.”
Rule Authority · M.D. Fla.
Consequently, the Court “takes the allegations in the counterclaim as true and construes the allegations ‘in the light most favorable to the [Defendants].’” Nicopior v. Moshi Moshi Palm Grove, LLC, 375 F. Supp. 3d 1278, 1282 (S.D.
alteration in original
Cited · D.S.C. · signal: see
See Nicopior v. Moshi Moshi Palm Grove, LLC, 375 F. Supp. 3d 1278, 1286-87 (S.D.
concluding that the court had supplemental jurisdiction over the defendant’s counterclaims in part because the resolution of the parties’ claims would “involve much of the same witnesses and evidence”