How cited: PG & E Corp. v. California ex rel. Lockyer · Go Syfert

PG & E Corp. v. California ex rel. Lockyer (2006)

green · 48 citation events across 8 courts. Showing the 12 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200720162026
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion
See United States v. MacEwan, 445 F.3d 237, 244 (3d Cir.2006), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 208 , 166 L.Ed.2d 144 (2006) (adopting a mode of analysis, under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A, that directly equates Internet use with interstate commerce); United States v. Carroll, 105 F.3d 740, 742 (1st Cir.1997) (stating that transmission of photographs via the Internet is "tantamount to" moving them through interstate commerce for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 2251 (a)).
adopting a mode of analysis, under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A, that directly equates Internet use with interstate commerce
Cited · 6th Cir. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion
See United States v. MacEwan, 445 F.3d 237, 239 (3d Cir.2006) (holding that “use of the Internet satisfies the interstate commerce element of the federal law prohibiting the receipt of child pornography, 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2)(B)”), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 882 , 127 S.Ct. 208 , 166 L.Ed.2d 144 (2006); United States v. Runyan, 290 F.3d 223, 239 (5th Cir.2002) (“We join the First Circuit in holding that ‘transmission of photographs by means of the Internet is tantamount to mov…
Cited (see also) · 6th Cir. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
“When a district court adequately explains why it imposed a particular sentence, especially one within the advisory Guidelines range, we do not further require that it exhaustively explain the obverse — why an alternative sentence was not selected in every instance.” United States v. Gale, 468 F.3d 929 (6th Cir.2006); see also United States v. Fernandez, 443 F.3d 19, 30 (2d Cir.2006) (“[W]e will not conclude that a district judge shirked her obligation to consider the § 3553…
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See City & County of San Francisco v. PG & E Corp., 433 F.3d 1115, 1122 (9th Cir.) (holding that section 1447(d) does not apply to decisions not to remand a case), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 127 S.Ct. 208 , 166 L.Ed.2d 144 (2006); In re Bissonnet Invs.
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See United States v. MacEwan, 445 F.3d 237 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 127 S.Ct. 208 , 166 L.Ed.2d 144 (2006); see also United States v. Frank, 864 F.2d 992, 1010 (3d Cir.1988).
Cited (see also) · 6th Cir. · signal: see also
Indeed, "[w]hen a district court adequately explains why it imposed a particular sentence ... we do not further require that it exhaustively explain the obverse — why an alternative sentence was not selected — in every instance.” United States v. Gale, 468 F.3d 929, 940 (6th Cir.2006); see also United States v. Fernandez, 443 F.3d 19, 30 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 882 , 127 S.Ct. 192 , 166 L.Ed.2d 143 (2006) ("[W]e will not conclude that a district judge shirked her o…
"[W]e will not conclude that a district judge shirked her obligation to consider the § 3553(a) factors simply because she did not discuss each one individually!.]”
Cited (see also) · 2d Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., United States v. Fernandez, 443 F.3d 19, 30 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 882 , 127 S.Ct. 192 , 166 L.Ed.2d 143 (2006).
green In Re: Seven Fields (2007)
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See City & County of San Francisco v. PG&E Corp., 433 F.3d 1115 , 1122 (9th Cir.) (holding that section 1447(d) does not apply to decisions not to remand a case), cert. denied, 127 S.Ct. 208 (2006); In re Bissonnet Invs.
same
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See City & County of San Francisco v. PG & E Corp., 433 F.3d 1115, 1122 (9th Cir.) (holding that section 1447(d) does not apply to decisions not to remand a case), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 127 S.Ct. 208 , 166 L,Ed.2d 144 (2006); In re Bissonnet Invs.
green In Re: Seven Fields (2007)
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See City & County of San Francisco v. PG&E Corp., 433 F.3d 1115 , 1122 (9th Cir.) (holding that section 1447(d) does not apply to decisions not to remand a case), cert. denied, 127 S.Ct. 208 (2006); In re Bissonnet Invs.
same
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. MacEwan, 445 F.3d 237 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 127 S. Ct. 208 (2006); see also United States v. Frank, 864 F.2d 992, 1010 (3d Cir. 1988).
green In Re Saluti (2011)
Cited (see also) · N.J. · signal: see also · 3 citations in this opinion
Sommer eds., 16th ed.2010); see also City & Cnty. of San Francisco v. PG & E Corp., 433 F.3d 1115 ,1123-24 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 882 , 127 S.Ct. 208 , 166 L.Ed.2d 144 (2006); In re Commerce Oil Co., 847 F.2d 291, 295 (6th Cir.1988); In re McAtee, 162 B.R. 574, 577-78 (Bankr.N.D.Fla.1993).