How cited: Joseph Malomo Ajibola, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Sabena Belgium Airline, Defe… · Go Syfert

Joseph Malomo Ajibola, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Sabena Belgium Airline, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant (1997)

green · 68 citation events across 16 courts. Showing the 12 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199720112026
Quote Authority · E.D.N.Y · signal: accord
Accord Banque Nationale de Paris v. Batmanghelidj, 108 F.3d 1369 , 1997 WL 138944, at *2 (2d Cir. Mar.18, 1997) (“when a new agreement merely modifies an earlier agreement, any provisions of the earlier agreement that are consistent with the modified version will survive”); Chicago College of Osteopathic Med, v. George A. Fuller Co., 776 F.2d 198 , 208 (7th Cir.1985) (a modification of a contract is a change that introduces new elements into the original contract, but leaves…
“when a new agreement merely modifies an earlier agreement, any provisions of the earlier agreement that are consistent with the modified version will survive”
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
In that situation, unless the buyer expressly preserves his rights under the warranties ..., we think the buyer has waived the breach.” Galli v. Metz, 973 F.2d 145, 151 (2d Cir.1992) (emphasis added); see In re Chateaugay Corp., 155 B.R. 636, 650-51 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1993), aff'd, 108 F.3d 1369 (2d Cir.1997).
green Harvin v. Cheney (2024)
Cited · D. Conn. · signal: see
See Blum v. Schlegel, 108 F.3d 1369 (2d Cir. 1997) (unpublished).
unpublished
Cited · W.D.N.Y. · signal: see
Austrian Airlines Oesterreichische Luftverkehrs AG, 567 F.Supp.2d at 592 (applying Article 2 of the UCC to the sale of an aircraft); see Coastal Aviation, Inc. v. Commander Aircraft Co., 937 F.Supp. 1051, 1060 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) (same), aff'd, 108 F.3d 1369 (2d Cir. 1997).
Cited (see also) · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see also
Furthermore, because subject matter jurisdiction involves the Court’s power to decide the case, in considering a 12(b)(1) motion for dismissal based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction, courts “need not accept as *407 true contested jurisdictional allegations and may resolve disputed jurisdictional facts by reference to affidavits and other material outside the pleadings.” Id.; see also Dillard v. Runyon, 928 F.Supp. 1316, 1322 (S.D.N.Y.1996), aff’d mem., 108 F.3d 1369 , …
Cited · W.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See generally Blum v. Schlegel, 1996 WL 925921 (W.D.N.Y.1996), aff'd, 108 F.3d 1369 (2d Cir.1997).
Cited · W.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See Coggins v. 297 Lenox Realty Co., 108 F.3d 1369 , 1997 WL 138781 (2d Cir.1997) (unpublished opinion); Bugg v. International Union of Allied Indus.
Cited (see also) · E.D.N.Y · signal: see also
See, e.g., Raphael v. 18 Restaurant, Inc., 954 F.Supp. 549, 552 (E.D.N.Y.1996) (indicating hearings normally required to determine subject matter jurisdiction when “court does not have sufficient information before it to determine the principal place of business of each defendant ...”); see also Dillard v. Runyon, 928 F.Supp. 1316, 1321-22 (S.D.N.Y.1996), affd, 108 F.3d 1369 , 1997 WL 138691 (2d Cir.1997); Ferrara Bakery & Café, Inc. v. Colavita Pasta & Olive Oil Corp., No. …
Cited (see also) · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see also
Bell & Assocs., Inc. v. Lloyd’s Underwriters, 827 F.Supp. 985, 988 (S.D.N.Y.1993); see also, e.g., Coastal Aviation, Inc. v. Commander Aircraft Co., 937 F.Supp. 1051, 1060 (S.D.N.Y.1996), aff'd, 108 F.3d 1369 (2d Cir.1997).
Cited · E.D.N.Y · signal: see
See Coastal Aviation, Inc. v. Commander Aircraft Co., 937 F.Supp. 1051, 1060 (S.D.N.Y.1996), aff'd 108 F.3d 1369 (2d Cir.1997).
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See Coastal Aviation, Inc. v. Commander Aircraft Co., 937 F.Supp. 1051, 1060 (S.D.N.Y.1996), aff'd 108 F.3d 1369 (2d Cir.1997).
Cited · E.D.N.Y · signal: see
See Coastal Aviation, Inc. v. Commander Aircraft Co., 937 F.Supp. 1051, 1063 (S.D.N.Y.1996) (citing cases), aff'd 108 F.3d 1369 , 1997 WL 138112 (2d Cir.1997); Bende & Sons, Inc. v. Crown Recreation, Inc., Kiffe Prods.