United States v. Dowty Woodville Polymer, Limited (1997)
green
· 43 citation events
across 12 courts.
Showing the 21 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199720112026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Rivera-Perez v. Stover (2026)
Thistlethwaite v. Dowty Woodville Polymer, Ltd., 110 F.3d 861, 866 (2d Cir. 1997) (“Headings and titles are not meant to take the place of the detailed provisions of the statutory text[.]” (cleaned up)).
“Headings and titles are not meant to take the place of the detailed provisions of the statutory text[.]” (cleaned up)
green
Hussain v. Mukasey (2008)
Thistlethwaite v. Dowty Woodville Polymer, Ltd., 110 F.3d 861, 866 (2d Cir.1997).
green
Hussain, Mohammad v. Mukasey, Michael B. (2008)
Thistlethwaite v. Dowty Woodville Polymer, Ltd., 110 F.3d 861, 866 (2d Cir. 1997).
Thistlethwaite v. Dowty Woodville Polymer, Ltd., 110 F.3d 861, 866 (2d Cir.1997) (noting that headings and titles do not override clear statutory text).
Thistlethwaite v. Dowty Woodville Polymer, Ltd., 110 F.3d 861, 866 (2d Cir.1997) (noting that headings and titles do not override clear statutory text).
See Thistlethwaite v. Dowty Woodville Polymer, Ltd., 110 F.3d 861 , 866 (2d Cir. 1997) ("Headings and titles are not meant to take the place of the detailed provisions of the statutory text; nor are they necessarily designed to be a reference guide or a synopsis.") (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted).
"Headings and titles are not meant to take the place of the detailed provisions of the statutory text; nor are they necessarily designed to be a reference guide or a synopsis."
Thistlethwaite v. Dowty Woodville Polymer, Ltd., 110 F.3d 861, 868 (2d Cir.1997).
green
Shepperson v. Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. (2024)
Thistlethwaite v. Dowty Woodville Polymer, Ltd., 110 F.3d 861, 864 (2d Cir. 1997).
green
Burke v. Vermont (2023)
Thistlethwaite v. Dowty Woodville Polymer, Ltd., 110 F.3d 861, 864 (2d Cir. 1997) (“As a general matter in the federal judicial system, the concepts of subject matter jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction, and venue address different concerns limiting the authority of a court to entertain a given case.”). 8 To the extent Plaintiff asserts claims against Defendant Johnson in her official capacity (Doc. 5 at 1–2), such claims are properly brought against her employer CoreCivic, …
“As a general matter in the federal judicial system, the concepts of subject matter jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction, and venue address different concerns limiting the authority of a court to entertain a given case.”
green
Galea v. Law Offices of Cary Alan Cliff (2022)
Thistlethwaite v. Dowty Woodville Polymer, Ltd., 110 F.3d 861, 864 (2d Cir. 1997) (explaining that “[s]ubject matter jurisdiction is concerned with the kinds of cases the federal district courts are empowered to decide” while “[p]ersonal jurisdiction…is concerned with the relationship of a given defendant to the particular geographic area in which a case is brought”).
green
United States of America and State of New York, ex rel. Patrick Donohue v. Richard Carranza, et.al. (2022)
“Specific procedural provisions in substantive federal statutes sometimes have their own . . . venue provisions.” Thistlethwaite, 110 F.3d at 864.
green
Pellegrino v. Fallahee (2021)
Thistlethwaite v. Dowty Woodville Polymer, Lid., 110 F.3d 861, 864 (2d Cir. 1997).
green
Peterson v. Tiffin Motor Homes, Inc (2019)
Thistlethwaite v. Dowty Woodville Polymer, Ltd., 110 F.3d 861, 864 (2d Cir. 1997).
See Thistlethwaite v. Dowty Woodville Polymer, Ltd. , 110 F.3d 861 , 866 (2d Cir. 1997) ("Headings and titles are not meant to take the place of the detailed provisions of the statutory text; nor are they necessarily designed to be a reference guide or a synopsis.") (internal quotation marks & alterations omitted).
"Headings and titles are not meant to take the place of the detailed provisions of the statutory text; nor are they necessarily designed to be a reference guide or a synopsis."
green
Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. McDonnell (2018)
Thistlethwaite v. Dowty Woodville Polymer, Ltd. , 110 F.3d 861 , 864 (2d Cir. 1997) ("[T]he subject matter jurisdiction provisions of Title 28 having broadest application are those granting the district courts power to entertain cases based on federal questions.").
"[T]he subject matter jurisdiction provisions of Title 28 having broadest application are those granting the district courts power to entertain cases based on federal questions."
green
Hawaii v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. (2006)
Thistlethwaite v. Dowty Woodville Polymer, Ltd., 110 F.3d 861, 866 (2d Cir.1997).
green
United States v. Universal Fruits & Vegetables Corp. (2005)
Thistlethwaite v. Dowty Woodville Polymer, Ltd., 110 F.3d 861, 865-68 (2d Cir.1997).
green
Scher v. Bayer Corp. (2003)
Thistlethwaite v. Dowty Woodville Polymer, Ltd., 110 F.3d 861, 866 (2d Cir.1997) (noting that headings and titles do not override clear statutory text).
Thistlethwaite v. Dowty Woodville Polymer, Ltd., 110 F.3d 861, 863 (2d Cir.1997) (quoting H.Rep.
green
United States ex rel. Felton v. Allflex USA, Inc. (1997)
Allflex cites the decision of the Second Circuit in Thistletliwaite permittingjurisdiction of aFalse Claims Act case to be based on 28 U.S.C. § 1345 , which provides for district court jurisdiction over cases “commenced by the United States.” 110 F.3d at 868.
See Thistlethwaite v. Dowty Woodville Polymer, Ltd., 110 F.3d 861, 866 (2d Cir.1997) (“Headings and titles are not meant to take the place of the detailed provisions of the statutory text; nor are they necessarily designed to be a reference guide or a synopsis.”) (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted).