Fort Zumwalt School District v. Robert Clynes (1997)
green
· 198 citation events
across 19 courts.
Showing the 39 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199720112026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Neosho R-V School District v. Clark (2003)
Gill, 217 F.3d at 1035 (citing Fort Zumwalt, 119 F.3d at 611, and Yankton Sch.
green
Blackmon v. Springfield R-Xii School District (2000)
See id.; Fort Zumwalt, 119 F.3d at 611.
See id.; Fort Zumwalt, 119 F.3d at 611.
No. 1, Minneapolis, Minn., 636 F.3d 981, 988-89 (8th Cir.2011); Fort Zumwalt, 119 F.3d at 611.
green
CJN Ex Rel. SKN v. Minneapolis Public Schools (2003)
But this difficulty is precisely why we have recognized that “[a]s long as a student is benefiting from his education, it is up to the educators to determine the appropriate educational methodology.” Fort Zumwalt, 119 F.3d at 614.
green
Neosho R-V School District v. Clark (2003)
Gill, 217 F.3d at 1035 (citing Fort Zumwalt, 119 F.3d at 611, and Yankton Sch.
green
K.E. v. IDS No. 15 (2011)
No. 1, Minneapolis, Minn., 636 F.3d 981, 988-89 (8th Cir. 2011); Fort Zumwalt, 119 F.3d at 611.
Dist. v. Clark, 315 F.3d 1022 , 1027 (8th Cir.2003) (quoting Fort Zumwalt, 119 F.3d at 612).
green
Cjn v. Minneapolis Public Schools (2003)
But this difficulty is precisely why we have recognized that "[a]s long as a student is benefiting from his education, it is up to the educators to determine the appropriate educational methodology." Fort Zumwalt, 119 F.3d at 614.
green
Krista Westendorp v. Robert Wedl (1998)
Dist., 119 F.3d at 612.
green
Lathrop R-II School District v. Gray (2010)
The IDEA “does not require that a school either maximize a student’s potential or provide the best possible education at public expense.” Clynes, 119 F.3d at 612.
See CJN, 323 F.3d at 636 (recognizing that, in a two-tier administrative review system, a court may choose to credit the first-tier’s findings based on observations of witnesses); Clynes, 119 F.3d at 610 (same).
same
See CJN, 323 F.3d at 636 (recognizing that, in a two-tier administrative review system, a court may choose to credit the first-tier's findings based on observations of witnesses); Clynes, 119 F.3d at 610 (same).
same
green
Mindy Reaves v. Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Missouri Division of Vocational Reh… (2005)
Cf. Neosho R-V School Dist. v. Clark, 315 F.3d 1022 , 1027 (2003); Clynes, 119 F.3d at 611; Reid ex rel.
green
Mindy Reaves v. MO State Bd. of (2005)
Cf. Neosho R-V School Dist. v. Clark, 315 F.3d 1022 , 1027 (2003); Clynes, 119 F.3d at 611; Reid ex rel.
green
Peter v. Wedl (1998)
Dist., 119 F.3d at 612.
Dist., 119 F.3d at 613 (“IDEA does not require the best possible education or superior results.”).
“IDEA does not require the best possible education or superior results.”
green
Scott Schoenfeld v. Parkway School District (1998)
The cost of private education is borne by the state when a child is placed in a private institution through a decision involving school officials, 20 U.S.C. 1413(a)(4)(B)(i), but parents who unilaterally place a child in private school do so at their own financial risk, School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of Education, 471 U.S. 359, 372-74 , 105 S.Ct. 1996, 2004-05 , 85 L.Ed.2d 385 (1985); Fort Zumwalt School District v. Clynes, 119 F.3d 607, 611-612 (8t…
Dist. v. Clynes, supra at 610 (“consideration should be given to the fact that the state hearing panel had the opportunity to observe the demeanor of witnesses”).
“consideration should be given to the fact that the state hearing panel had the opportunity to observe the demeanor of witnesses”
green
Reese v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF BISMARCK RV SCHOOL (2002)
The IDEA requires that a disabled child be provided with access to a "free and appropriate public education." [11] 20 U.S.C. § 1400© and (d)(1)(A); see also, Board of Education v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 203 , 102 S.Ct. 3034 , 73 L.Ed.2d 690 (1982); Jasa v. Millard Public School District No. 17, 206 F.3d 813, 815 (8th Cir. 2000); Gill v. Columbia 93 School District, 217 F.3d 1027, 1034 (8th Cir.2000); Fort Zumwalt School District v. Clynes, 119 F.3d 607, 610 (8th Cir.1997).
Dist. v. Clynes, supra at 610 (“consideration should be given to the fact that the state hearing panel had the opportunity to observe the demeanor of witnesses”).
“consideration should be given to the fact that the state hearing panel had the opportunity to observe the demeanor of witnesses”
green
Jl v. Francis Howell R-3 School Dist. (2010)
Thus, "parents who unilaterally `enroll their child in private school without the approval of the public school district do so with the risk they will not receive reimbursement for their costs.'" Id. (quoting Fort Zumwalt, 119 F.3d at 611-12).
green
McLaughlin v. City of Lowell (1998)
Zumwalt, supra at 615; Brantley v. Independent School Dist.
green
Does v. Key (2021)
Dist. v. Clynes, 119 F.3d 607 , 612 (8th Cir. 1997) (“IDEA does not require that a school either maximize a student’s potential or provide the best possible education at public expense...only that a public school provide sufficient specialized services so that the student benefits from his education”).
“IDEA does not require that a school either maximize a student’s potential or provide the best possible education at public expense...only that a public school provide sufficient specialized services so that the student benefits from his education”
green
Banwart v. Cedar Falls Community School District (2020)
Dist. v. Clynes, 119 F.3d 607 , 610 (8th Cir. 1997) (“[A] court may choose to credit the hearing panel’s findings based on observation of the witnesses and reject the reviewing officer’s analysis if it does not appear to give sufficient weight to the views of the professional educators.”).
“[A] court may choose to credit the hearing panel’s findings based on observation of the witnesses and reject the reviewing officer’s analysis if it does not appear to give sufficient weight to the views of the professional educators.”
Dist., 119 F.3d at 610.
green
Dohmen Ex Rel. Dohmen v. Twin Rivers Public Sch. (2002)
We affirm the rulings of the district court on these issues.” Id., 119 F.3d at 615.
green
King v. Board of Educ. of Allegany County (1998)
Id. at 612.
green
Strawn v. Missouri State Board of Education (2000)
See id.
green
Gill v. Columbia 93 School District (2000)
See Clynes, 119 F.3d at 612-13.
green
Gill v. Columbia 93 School District (2000)
See Clynes, 119 F.3d at 612-13.
green
Lauren Strawn, Also Known as Lauren S., by and Through Co-Guardians Karl C. & Laurie C. Karl Crawford, Also K… (2000)
See id.
green
E.S. v. Independent School District, No. 196 (1998)
See Fort Zumwalt, 119 F.3d at 613.
green
E.S., a Disabled Minor Jeanne Stein, Parent and Legal Guardian v. Independent School District, No. 196, Rosem… (1998)
See Fort Zumwalt, 119 F.3d at 613.
green
C.B. Ex Rel. B.B v. Special School District No. 1 (2009)
See id. at 610.
green
Pachl Ex Rel. Pachl v. Seagren (2005)
See id. at 611.
See id.
green
Osseo Area Sch. v. M.N.B. (2018)
See id.
green
Escambia County Board of Education v. Benton (2005)
See Fort Zumwalt School Dist. v. Clynes, 119 F.3d 607 , 610 (8th Cir.1997) ("courts are not to substitute their own notions of sound educational policy for those of the school authorities which they review”); Flartmann, 118 F.3d at 1000-01 ("Administrative findings in an IDEA case are entitled to be considered prima facie correct, and the district court, if it is not going to follow them, is required to explain why it does not.”); Mrs. B. v. Milford Bd. of Educ., 103 F.3d 11…