Clarke v. Stalder (1997)

green · 61 citation events across 15 courts. Showing the 21 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 21

Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

199720112026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Cleveland Brown v. Michael J. Crowley (2003)

Rule Authority · 6th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion

Any attempt to use the rules in, this manner would result in an unconstitutional application of the rules.” Clarke v. Stalder, 121 F.3d 222, 230 (5th Cir.), vacated on other grounds by 133 F.3d 940 (5th Cir.1997).

green Peterson v. Hardwell (2001)

Rule Authority · 5th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion

He relies on Clarke v. Stalder, 121 F.3d 222, 228-31 (5th Cir. 1997), vacated and reh’g granted, 133 F.3d 940 (5th Cir. 1997), reinstated in part, 154 F.3d 186 (5th Cir. 1998) (en banc), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1151 (1999).

green Davis v. Lithicum (2014)

Rule Authority · 5th Cir.

Oliver v. Scott, 276 F.3d 736, 745 (5th Cir.2002); Clarke v. Stalder, 121 F.3d 222, 229 (5th Cir.1997).

green Shelby L. Truitt v. Dolores Ramsey (1997)

Rule Authority · 10th Cir.

Edwards, 117 S.Ct. at 1589 ; Clarke v. Stalder, 121 F.3d 222, 226-27 (5th Cir.1997); Stone-Bey v. Barnes, 120 F.3d 718, 721-23 (7th Cir.1997). 9 The appeal is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B)(i) as frivolous.

green Truitt v. Ramsey (1997)

Rule Authority · 10th Cir.

Edwards, 117 S. Ct. at 1589 ; Clarke v. Stalder, 121 F.3d 222, 226-27 (5th Cir. 1997); Stone-Bey v. Barnes, 120 F.3d 718, 721-23 (7th Cir. -4- 1997).

green Larson v. Cooper (2005)

Rule Authority · Alaska · 2 citations in this opinion

(Listed in order by circuit) See, e.g,, Layne v. Vinzant, 657 F.2d 468, 475 (1st Cir.1981); Gayle, 313 F.3d at 682 (2d Cir.2002); Rauser v. Horn, 241 F.3d 330, 333 (3d Cir.2001); Clarke v. Stalder, 121 F.3d 222, 231 (5th Cir.1997), opinion vacated and relevant parts reinstated in, 154 F.3d 186, 191 (5th Cir.1998); Woods v. Smith, 60 F.3d 1161, 1166 (5th Cir.1995); Thaddeus-X, 175 F.3d at 399 (6th Cir.1999); Babcock, 102 F.3d at 275 (7th Cir.1996); Cornell v. Woods, 69 F.3d 1…

green Smith v. Spinks (2024)

Rule Authority · E.D. La.

Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973); Clarke v. Stalder, 121 F.3d 222, 226 (5th Cir.1997), reh’g en banc granted and opin. vacated, 133 F.3d 940 (5th Cir.1997), rev’d in part on other grounds and opin. reinstated in relevant part, 154 F.3d 186 , 187 (5th Cir.1998) (en banc); Hernandez v. Spencer, 780 F.2d 504, 504 (5th Cir.1986).

green Holder v. Cooley (2023)

Rule Authority · W.D. La.

Clarke v. Stalder, 121 F.3d 222, 231 (5th Cir. 1997), vacated in part & reinstated in relevant part, 154 F.3d 186 (5th Cir. 1998) (citing Bounds v. Smith, 97 S. Ct. 1491 (1977); Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299, 310 (5th Cir. 1997); Woods, 60 F.3d at 1164-66 ) (quotations and additional citations omitted); accord Walker, 658 Fed.

green Mark Hanna v. Delmer Maxwell (2013)

Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Clarke v. Stalder, 154 F.3d 186, 187 (5th Cir. 1998) (en banc) (reinstating panel’s analysis of retaliation claim in Part IV of Clarke v. Stalder, 121 F.3d 222, 231 (5th Cir. 1997)). 2 See USCA5 R. 10–11, 26–27 (complaint seeking damages for allegedly “wrongful, unconstitutional, prolonged and/or intensified incarceration” imposed pursuant to disciplinary conviction (emphasis added)).

green Simmons v. Cockrell (2003)

Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Clarke v. Stalder, 121 F.3d 222, 231-32 (5th Cir. 1997), vacated on other grounds, 154 F.3d 186 (5th Cir. 1998)(en banc).

green Mark Hanna v. Delmer Maxwell (2014)

Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see

green Mark Hanna v. Delmer Maxwell (2013)

Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see

green Geiger v. Jowers (2005)

Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see

See Clarke v. Stalder, 121 F.3d 222 , 227 n. 8 (5th Cir.) (suggesting in dictum that monetary relief but not injunctive relief "might be difficult” in light of § 1997e(e)’s physical injury requirement in a § 1983 suit alleging a First Amendment violation), vacated for reh’g en banc, 133 F.3d 940 (5th Cir.1997); Oliver v. Scott, 276 F.3d 736 , 747 n. 20 (5th Cir.2002) (declining to reach issue of whether PLRA's physical injury requirement applies to equal protection claims, n…

green Bennett v. Rhodes (2002)

Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see

See Clarke v. Stalder, 121 F.3d 222 , 225 n.4 (5th Cir. 1997), on rehearing en banc, 154 F.3d 186 (5th Cir. 1998); Taylor v. Green, 868 F.2d 162, 165 (5th Cir. 1989).

green Brown, Ernest v. Plaut, William M. (1997)

Cited (see also) · D.C. Cir. · signal: see also

See also Clarke v. Stalder, 121 F.3d 222, 226 (5th Cir.1997) (Preiser and Edwards do not apply to actions in which "a favorable determination would not automatically entitle the prisoner to accelerated release”). 6 .

green Pruitt v. Simmons (1997)

Cited (see also) · 10th Cir. · signal: see also

Plaintiff filed his complaint after the effective date of the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act, which precludes any "Federal civil action ... by a prisoner confined in a jail, prison, or other correctional facility[ ] for mental or emotional injury suffered while in custody without a prior showing of physical injury." 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(e) (Supp.1997); see also Clarke v. Stalder, 121 F.3d 222 , 227 n. 8 (5th Cir.1997) (addressing First Amendment claim).

green Pruitt v. Simmons (1997)

Cited (see also) · 10th Cir. · signal: see also

Plaintiff filed -2- his complaint after the effective date of the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act, which precludes any “Federal civil action . . . by a prisoner confined in a jail, prison, or other correctional facility[] for mental or emotional injury suffered while in custody without a prior showing of physical injury.” 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(e) (Supp. 1997); see also Clarke v. Stalder, 121 F.3d 222 , 227 n.8 (5th Cir. 1997) (addressing First Amendment claim).

addressing First Amendment claim

green Jamison v. Central Mississippi Correctional Facility (2021)

Cited · N.D. Miss. · signal: see

See Clarke v. Stalder, 121 F.3d 222, 226 (5th Cir. 1997) (When a “favorable determination [of the habeas claim] would … entitle the prisoner to accelerated release, … he must first get a habeas judgment.”); see also Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) (finding a claim that calls into question the lawfulness of conviction or confinement, or otherwise demonstrates the invalidity of the conviction or confinement, is not cognizable under § 1983). the proper forms, and the dead…

When a “favorable determination [of the habeas claim] would … entitle the prisoner to accelerated release, … he must first get a habeas judgment.”

green Jackson v. Johnson (1998)

Cited (see also) · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see also

Id. at 167 (citing Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. at 499 , 93 S.Ct. 1827 ). 45 . 131 F.3d at 167-68 ; see also Clarke v. Stalder, 121 F.3d 222, 226 (5th Cir.1997) (Preiser and Edwards do not apply to actions in which "a favorable determination would not automatically entitle the prisoner to accelerated release.”). 46 . 120 F.3d 718, 721 (7th Cir.1997). 47 .

green Warburton v. Underwood (1998)

Cited (see also) · W.D.N.Y. · signal: see also

Id. 117 S.Ct. at 1588 ; see also Clarke v. Stalder, 121 F.3d 222, 226 (5th Cir.1997); Burnell v. Coughlin, 975 F.Supp. 473, 477 (W.D.N.Y. 1997) (holding that the proper procedures for challenging the results of a prison disciplinary hearing are “appeal, administrative review, collateral attack, or habeas corpus”).

holding that the proper procedures for challenging the results of a prison disciplinary hearing are “appeal, administrative review, collateral attack, or habeas corpus”

green Brown v. Smith (1998)

Cited (see also) · W.D.N.Y. · signal: see also

Id. at 1588; see also Clarke v. Stalder, 121 F.3d 222, 226 (5th Cir.1997); Burnell v. Coughlin, 975 F.Supp. 473, 477 (W.D.N.Y.1997) (holding that the proper procedures for challenging the results of a prison disciplinary hearing are “appeal, administrative review, collateral attack, or habeas corpus.”).