Western Radio Services Company, Inc. v. Glickman (1997)
green
· 268 citation events
across 19 courts.
Showing the 50 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199720112026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Cabrera v. City of Huntington Park (1998)
Co. Inc. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189, 1192 (9th Cir.1997).
green
Jose E. Cabrera v. City of Huntington Park Frank Sullivan, Chief of Police Sued as an Individual & in an Offi… (1998)
Co. Inc. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189, 1192 (9th Cir.1997).
green
Warfield v. Nance (2025)
For claim preclusion “to apply there must be: 1) an identity of claims, 2) a final judgment on the merits, and 3) identity or privity between parties.” Glickman, 123 F.3d at 1192.
City of Carmel-By-The-Sea, 123 F.3d at 1150 (quotation marks and citation omitted).
quotation marks and citation omitted
green
Andrew Clark v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (2022)
Co., 123 F.3d at 1192.
green
Tritz v. United States Postal Service (2013)
Co., Inc. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189, 1192 (9th Cir.1997).
green
Richard Chudacoff v. University Medical Center (2013)
Radio Servs., 123 F.3d at 1192.
green
Bear Creek Council v. Heath (2005)
Co., Inc. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189,1192 (9th Cir.1997).
green
Knox v. Potter (2005)
Co, 123 F.3d at 1192 (doctrine of res judicata serves to bar a claim where there is an identity of claims, a final judgment on the merits and an identity of parties).
doctrine of res judicata serves to bar a claim where there is an identity of claims, a final judgment on the merits and an identity of parties
green
Knox v. Potter (2005)
Co, 123 F.3d at 1192 (doctrine of res judicata serves to bar a claim where there is an identity of claims, a final judgment on the merits and an identity of parties).
doctrine of res judicata serves to bar a claim where there is an identity of claims, a final judgment on the merits and an identity of parties
green
Magiera v. Norton (2004)
Co., Inc. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189, 1196 (9th Cir.1997) (internal quotations and citation omitted) (alteration in the original).
green
Glair v. Cabrera (2001)
We review de novo the district court’s dismissal, see Western Radio Services Co., Inc. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189, 1192 (9th Cir.1997), and we affirm.
green
ONRC Action v. Bureau of Land Management (1998)
Co., Inc. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189, 1196 (9th Cir.1997) (explaining that a final agency action must “mark the ‘consummation’ of the agency’s decisionmaking process,” thus implying that a process of deci-sionmaking must be underway).
green
Onrc Action v. Bureau of Land Management (1998)
Co., Inc. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189, 1196 (9th Cir.1997) (explaining that a final agency action must "mark the 'consummation' of the agency's decisionmaking process," thus implying that a process of decisionmaking must be underway).
green
George May v. Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc. Ramparts, Inc. William G. Bennett Mel Larson Clyde Turner (1997)
Co., Inc. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189, 1192 (9th Cir.1997).
Co., Inc. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189, 1196 (9th Cir.1997) (“The APA thus insulates from immediate judicial review the agency’s preliminary or procedural steps.”).
green
Association of Public Agency Customers, Inc. v. Bonneville Power Administration, Aluminum Company of America … (1997)
Co., Inc. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189, 1196 (9th Cir.1997) ("The APA thus insulates from immediate judicial review the agency's preliminary or procedural steps.").
green
Aguilar v. Applied Underwriters, Inc. (2020)
Co., 13 123 F.3d at 1192 (citation omitted). 14 1.
citation omitted
green
Uche-Uwakwe v. Shinseki (2013)
Co., Inc. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189, 1192 (9th Cir.1997) (“Res judicata, also known as claim preclusion, bars litigation in a subsequent action of any claims that were raised or could have been raised in the prior action”).
Co., Inc. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189, 1196 (9th Cir. *1091 1997).
green
TEEC ANGEL MANAGEMENT, LLC v. TSINGYUAN VENTURES LLC (2025)
W. 9 Radio Servs., 123 F.3d at 1192. 10 According to Foothill, based on collateral estoppel or res judicata, the panel’s findings as 11 to Zhang and Xia’s breach of contract claim bar Plaintiffs’ Lanham Act and unfair competition 12 claims in this case.
green
Hurst-Castl v. Long Term Capital Partnership VI, LLC (2025)
Co., Inc. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189, 1192 (9th Cir. 1997).
green
Kransky v. Gigliotti (2024)
Co., Inc. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189, 1192 (9th Cir. 1997).
green
(PS) Shinshuri v. California Physicians' Services (2024)
Co., 7 || Inc., v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189, 1192 (9th Cir.1997). 8 As to identity of claims, plaintiff concedes that the instant federal action involves the 9 || “same causes of action and same parties/litigants” as the state court action.
green
Chrisanthis v. Department of Veterans Affairs (2023)
Co., 123 F.3d at 1192. 4 In any event, the same conclusions in our decision dismissing the prior action would 5 apply to plaintiff’s unpled retirement benefits claim, rendering any further amendment futile. 6 The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has explained: 7 As a general matter, the Civil Service Reform Act [(CSRA)] and Federal Employees’ Retirement System Act preclude district court 8 review of challenges to federal employee retirement…
green
Forsman v. Port of Seattle (2023)
Tritz v. U.S. Postal Serv., 26 721 F.3d 1133, 1141 (9th Cir. 2013) (citing Glickman, 123 F.3d at 1192).
green
Georgatos v. Arizona, State of (2023)
Co., 10 Inc., v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189, 1192 (9th Cir. 1997).
green
Brooks v. Tenney (2023)
Co. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189 , 1192 (9th Cir. 1997) (“Res judicata, 11 also known as claim preclusion, bars litigation in a subsequent action of any claims that were raised 12 or could have been raised in the prior action.”); Shavlik v. Snohomish Cnty.
“Res judicata, 11 also known as claim preclusion, bars litigation in a subsequent action of any claims that were raised 12 or could have been raised in the prior action.”
green
Bright v. Treehouse Group LLC (2023)
“Res judicata, however, may be asserted in 7 a motion to dismiss so long as it does not raise any disputed issues of fact.” Id. (citing Scott 8 v. Kuhlmann, 746 F.2d 1377, 1378 (9th Cir. 1984) and Day v. Moscow, 955 F.2d 807 , 811 9 (2d Cir. 1992)). 10 “Res judicata, also known as claim preclusion, bars litigation in a subsequent action 11 of any claims that were raised or could have been raised in the prior action.” Western Radio 12 Services Co., Inc. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d …
citations omitted
green
Sussman v. Scripps Mercy Hospital (2023)
Co. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189 , 1192 (9th Cir. 10 1997) (“Res judicata, also known as claim preclusion, bars litigation in a 11 subsequent action of any claims that were raised or could have been raised in the 12 prior action.”). 13 The County Conservators Office is merely a subunit of the County and is not 14 a proper party.
“Res judicata, also known as claim preclusion, bars litigation in a 11 subsequent action of any claims that were raised or could have been raised in the 12 prior action.”
green
Hagendorf v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC (2023)
Co., Inc. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189, 1192 (9th Cir. 1997).
green
Arbor Home, LLC v. Mayorkas (2022)
Co., Inc. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189, 1996 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Bennett v. Spear, 520 5 U.S. 154 , 177–78 (1997) (“final agency action” is the “consummation of the agency’s 6 decisionmaking process” from which “legal consequences will flow”).
green
Citcon USA, LLC v. MaplePay Inc. (2021)
Co., 6 123 F.3d at 1192.
green
Forsman v. Port of Seattle (2021)
Tritz v. U.S. Postal Serv., 4 721 F.3d 1133, 1141 (9th Cir. 2013) (citing Glickman, 123 F.3d at 1192).
green
Razaghi v. Razaghi Development Company, LLC (2021)
Co., Inc. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189, 1192 (9th Cir. 16 1997).
green
Citcon USA, LLC v. MaplePay Inc. (2021)
Co., 27 123 F.3d at 1192.
green
Moloaa Farms LLC v. Kauai Planning Commission (2020)
Co., Inc. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189, 1192 (9th Cir. 1997).
green
Taylor v. Clark County School District (2020)
Co., Inc. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189, 1192 (9th Cir. 1997).
green
Raybould v. Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC (2020)
Co., Inc. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189, 1192 (9th Cir. 1997)); see also Drews v. EBI Cos., 310 Or. 134, 140 , 795 P.2d 531 (1990) (a plaintiff who has litigated against a defendant through final judgment is precluded from bringing a lawsuit arising from the same factual transaction against the same defendant).
green
Gallardo v. AT & T Mobility, LLC (2013)
Co., Inc. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189, 1192 (9th Cir.1997).
green
Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A. (2003)
The doctrine is applicable whenever there is “(1) an identity of claims, (2) a final judgment on the merits, and (3) identity or *1149 privity between parties.” Owens, supra, 244 F.3d at 713 ; Western Radio, supra, 123 F.3d at 1192 (same); Robi supra, 838 F.2d at 324 (same).
same
green
Riverhawks v. Zepeda (2002)
The action must also be “one by which ‘rights or obligations have been determined,’ or from which ‘legal consequences will flow.’ ” Id. (quoting Port of Boston Marine Terminal Ass’n v. Rederiaktiebolaget Transatlantic, 400 U.S. 62, 71 , 91 S.Ct. 203 , 27 L.Ed.2d 203 (1970)); West *1180 ern Radio Services Co., Inc. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189, 1196 (9th Cir.1997).
green
City of Yakima v. Surface Transportation Board (1999)
Western Radio Services Co., Inc., v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189, 1196-97 (9th Cir.1997) (citing Bennett v. Spear, 520 U.S. 154, 168 , 117 S.Ct. 1154 , 137 L.Ed.2d 281 (1997)).
green
De Perio v. Gonzales (2007)
See Western Radio, 123 F.3d at 1192 (emphasis added).
emphasis added
See Western Radio, 123 F.3d at 1192 (doctrine of res judicata serves to bar a claim where there is an identity of claims, a final judgment on the merits, and an identity of parties).
doctrine of res judicata serves to bar a claim where there is an identity of claims, a final judgment on the merits, and an identity of parties
green
Castellanos v. Zieve (2023)
See id.
green
Meyer v. County of Sonoma (2025)
See id.
green
Easton v. United States of America (2020)
See Glickman, 123 F.3d at 1192.
green
Sierra Club v. Bosworth (2002)
See Western Radio v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189 , 1195 (9th Cir.1997) (holding tower and access road for tower not connected actions where tower could function independently of road). b.
green
Sierra Club v. Babbitt (1999)
See Western Radio Services v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189 , 1195 (9th Cir.1997) (projects trigger one another if they cannot function without the other).