How cited: Friedman v. Grace · Go Syfert

Friedman v. Grace (1995)

green · 39 citation events across 16 courts. Showing the 6 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199620112026
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Id. at 555.
Cited (see also) · 1st Cir. · signal: compare
Compare Schiller & Schmidt, Inc. v. Nordisco co Corp., 969 F.2d 410, 413 (7th Cir.1992) (written work-for-hire agreement must precede creation of work), and Gladwell Gov't Servs., Inc. v. Cnty. of Marin, 265 Fed.Appx. 624, 626 (9th Cir.2008) (same), with Playboy Enters., Inc. v. Dumas, 53 F.3d 549 , 559 (2d Cir.) (written agreement might postdate creation if "memorializing” earlier oral agreement), ce rt. denied, 516 U.S. 1010 , 116 S.Ct. 567 , 133 L.Ed.2d 491 (1995).
Cited · W.D.N.C. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Dumas, 53 F.3d 549, 560 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 567 , 133 L.Ed.2d 491 (1995).
green Robinson v. Salazar (2012)
Cited (see also) · E.D. Cal. · signal: see also
See also Branson v. Nott, 62 F.3d 287, 291 (9th Cir.1995) (“As courts of original jurisdiction, federal district courts have no authority to review the final determinations of a state court in judicial proceedings.”), cer t. denied, 516 U.S. 1009 , 116 S.Ct. 565 , 133 L.Ed.2d 491 (1995); see also Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Indus.
green Robinson v. Salazar (2012)
Cited (see also) · E.D. Cal. · signal: see also
See also Branson v. Nott, 62 F.3d 287, 291 (9th Cir.1995) (“As courts of original jurisdiction, federal district courts have no authority to review the final determinations of a state court in judicial proceed ings.”), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1009 , 116 S.Ct. 565 , 133 L.Ed.2d 491 (1995); see also Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Indus.
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Dumas, 53 F.3d 549, 564 (2d Cir.) (finding that cheek legend providing for the “assignment ... of all right, title, and interest” was ambiguous, and did not effectively transfer copyright in certain paintings), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 567 , 133 L.Ed.2d 491 (1995); see also Papa’s-June, 921 F.Supp. at 1159 (“neither the royalty checks nor the attached royalty statements mention a transfer of copyright ownership.”); Museum Boutique In…