How cited: Reis v. OOIDA Risk Retention Grp., Inc. · Go Syfert

Reis v. OOIDA Risk Retention Grp., Inc. (2018)

green · 14 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 7 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 7
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green Kenneth Daniels v. Main Highway Logistics, LLC, et al. (2025)
Rule Authority · M.D. Ga.
In Reis, the Georgia Supreme Court held that “direct action statutes both directly and indirectly regulate the operations of insurers of motor carries in Georgia[,]” and this type of regulating “is not allowed in the case of a foreign risk retention group by the express act of Congress in the LRRA.” Reis v. OOIDA Risk Retention Grp., Inc., 814 S.E.2d 338, 343 (Ga. 2018).
green Adams v. AIS Trucking , LLC (2025)
Rule Authority · S.D. Ga.
Id. (quoting Reis v. OOIDA Risk Retention Grp., Inc., 814 S.E.2d 338, 343 (Ga. 2018)).
green Keondrae Stillwell v. Topa Insurance Company (2022)
Quote Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Topa, on the other hand, maintains 10 See OCGA §§ 40-1-112(c) and 40-2-140; Reis v. OOIDA Risk Retention Grp., Inc., 303 Ga. 659, 664 ( 814 SE2d 338 ) (2018) (“[T]he direct[-]action statutes provide a vehicle for directly naming a risk retention group as a party in a lawsuit.”); Hartford Ins.
“[T]he direct[-]action statutes provide a vehicle for directly naming a risk retention group as a party in a lawsuit.”
green McIntire v. Ventura (2021)
Rule Authority · S.D. Ga.
Reis v. OOIDA Risk Retention Grp., Inc., 814 S.E.2d 338, 343 (Ga. 2018).
green Kenneth Hughes v. Ace American Insurance Company (2023)
Cited (see also) · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See also Reis v. OOIDA Risk Retention Group, 303 Ga. 659, 664, n.12 ( 814 SE2d 338 ) (2018) (Noting that former OCGA § 46-7-12 (c) provided: “‘It shall be permissible under this article for any person having a cause of action arising under this article to join in the same action the motor carrier and the insurance carrier, whether arising in tort or contract.’”).
Noting that former OCGA § 46-7-12 (c) provided: “‘It shall be permissible under this article for any person having a cause of action arising under this article to join in the same action the motor carrier and the insurance carrier, whether arising in tort or contract.’”
green Shawn M. Smith v. Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (2022)
Cited (see also) · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see also
See also Reis v. OOIDA Risk Retention Group, 303 Ga. 659, 660 ( 814 SE2d 338 ) (2018).
green Mitchell v. Dixie Transport, Inc. (2019)
Cited · N.D. Ga. · signal: see
See Reis v. OOIDA Risk Retention Grp., Inc., 814 S.E.2d 338, 339 (Ga. 2018).