Phillips v. Conley (1950)
green
· 6 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 2 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
For the preservation of the lien and privilege, it must be possible for one, so to speak, to be able to put his hands on the specific object that was sold, and have the ability to separate it unimpaired from *498 other objects or things which it may be associated or to which it may be attached.” Phillips (supra), 652 (emphasis added); 2 This court views Elder’s attempts to distinguish these cases and the solid jurisprudential foundation upon which they stand from the present…
emphasis added
green
Byrnside Drilling Co. v. Armour (2004)
See In re Exclusive Industries Corporation, 41 B.R. 493 (Bankr.W.D.La.1984), citing Phillips v. Conley, 46 So.2d 650 (La.App. 2d Cir.1950)(“For the preservation of the lien and privilege, it must be possible for one, so to speak, to be able to put his hands on the specific object that was sold, and have the ability to separate it unimpaired from other objects or things with which it may be associated or to which it may be attached.”) 1 We conclude, ^therefore, that the chatt…