How cited: Itt Base Services and Ina/cigna v. Whit L. Hickson and Director, Office of Workers' Compe… · Go Syfert

Itt Base Services and Ina/cigna v. Whit L. Hickson and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (1998)

green · 31 citation events across 11 courts. Showing the 16 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199920122026
Quote Authority · 2d Cir. · signal: see, e.g. · 6 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., Hickson, 155 F.3d at 1275 (“Reading the plain language of the [DBA], we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over the instant petition for review.”); Lee, 123 F.3d at 805 (“Section 3(b) of the DBA clearly and unambiguously provides that a party adversely affected by the administrative resolution of a DBA claim must file a petition for review in the United States [District [C]ourt.”); Stillwell, 597 F.2d at 89 (“[Section 3(b) of the DBA] is unambiguous and it clearly…
“Reading the plain language of the [DBA], we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over the instant petition for review.”
Quote Authority · 2d Cir. · signal: see, e.g. · 3 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., Hickson, 155 F.3d at 1275 (“Reading the 2 plain language of the [DBA], we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over the instant petition for 3 review.”); Lee, 123 F.3d at 805 (“Section 3(b) of the DBA clearly and unambiguously provides 4 that a party adversely affected by the administrative resolution of a DBA claim must file a 5 petition for review in the United States [D]istrict [C]ourt.”); Stillwell, 597 F.2d at 89 (“[Section 6 3(b) of the DBA] is unambiguous and…
“Reading the 2 plain language of the [DBA], we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over the instant petition for 3 review.”
Rule Authority · 1st Cir.
Four circuits endorse review by the district court, ITT Base Servs. v. Hickson, 155 F.3d 1272, 1275 (11th Cir.1998); Lee v. Boeing Co., 123 F.3d 801, 805 (4th Cir.1997); AFIA/CIGNA Worldwide, 930 F.2d at 1116 ; Home Indem.
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
ITT Base Servs. v. Hickson, 155 F.3d 1272, 1276 (11th Cir. 1998) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).
citation and internal quotation marks omitted
Rule Authority · 7th Cir.
E.g., ITT Base Services v. Hickson, 155 F.3d 1272, 1276 (11th Cir.1998); Scherbatskoy v. Halliburton Co., 125 F.3d 288, 292 (5th Cir.1997); Gunn v. United States Dept. of Agriculture, supra, 118 F.3d at 1240 .
Rule Authority · M.D. Fla. · 2 citations in this opinion
Standard of Review “Congress enacted the LHWCA in 1927 to provide workers’ compensation coverage to certain maritime employees[,]” and it “subsequently enacted the DBA in 1941 to extend the workers’ compensation coverage of the LHWCA to employees working on air, military, and naval bases outside the continental United States.” ITT Base Servs. v. Hickson, 155 F.3d 1272, 1274 (11th Cir. 1998).4 The LHWCA “authorizes 4 The DBA generally incorporates by reference the provisions …
Rule Authority · N.D. Fla. · signal: cf.
Cf. ITT Base Servs. v. Hickson, 155 F.3d 1272, 1276 (11th Cir. 1998) (noting “that a transfer would be in the ‘interests of justice’” under § 1631 if dismissal would cause claims to become time barred).
noting “that a transfer would be in the ‘interests of justice’” under § 1631 if dismissal would cause claims to become time barred
Rule Authority · N.D. Ala.
Ala. Mar. 27, 2008) (“The lack of jurisdiction precludes this court’s power to adjudicate the case but does not prevent the court from transferring the case under Section 1631.” (citing ITT Base Servs. v. Hickson, 155 F.3d 1272, 1276 (11th Cir. 1998); Slatick v. Dep’t of Labor, 698 F.2d 433, 434 (11th Cir. 1983))).
Rule Authority · E.D. Va.
Co. v. Stillwell, 597 F.2d 87, 89 (6th Cir. 1979) (same), and /TT Base Servs. v. Hickson, 155 F.3d 1272, 1275 (11th Cir. 1998) (same), with Pearce v. Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, 603 F.2d 763 (9th Cir. 1979) (finding initial judicial review in court of appeals proper), and Serv.
same
Rule Authority · M.D. Fla.
ITT Base Servs. v. Hickson, 155 F.3d 1272, 1276 (11th Cir.1998); Peavy v. Klausner, No. 8:11-CV-0508-T-27EAJ, 2011 WL 3841633 , at *5 (M.D.Fla.
Rule Authority
ITT Base Servs. v. Hickson, 155 F.3d 1272, 1276 (11th Cir.1998); Slatick v. Director, OWCP, U.S. Dept. of Labor, 698 F.2d 433, 434 (11th Cir.1983) (per curiam).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See ITT Base Servs. v. Hickson, 155 F.3d 1272, 1275 (11th Cir. 1998); Hice v. Dir., Office of Workers’ Comp.
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see
See ITT Base Servs. v. Hickson, 155 F.3d 1272, 1276 (11th Cir. 1998).
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see
See ITT Base Servs. v. Hickson, 155 F.3d 1272, 1276 (11th Cir.1998) (holding that a transfer was “in the interests of justice” because, without the transfer, an appeal to the appropriate district court would “probably be time-barred”); see also Slatick v. Dir., Office of Workers’ Comp.
Cited (see also) · N.D. Ga. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., ITT Base Servs. v. Hickson, 155 F.3d 1272, 1276 (11th Cir. 1998). .
Cited · D.P.R. · signal: see
See ITT Base Serv. v. Hickson, 155 F.3d 1272, 1275 (11th Cir.1998); Lee v. Boeing Co., 123 F.3d 801, 805 (4th Cir.1997); AFIA/CIGNA Worldwide v. Felkner, 930 F.2d 1111, 1116 (5th Cir.1991); Home Indem.