How cited: California Credit Union League v. City of Anaheim · Go Syfert

California Credit Union League v. City of Anaheim (1999)

green · 33 citation events across 7 courts. Showing the 15 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200120132026
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
TEACHERS ASS’N League v. City of Anaheim, 190 F.3d 997, 1001 (9th Cir. 1999), and where (2) joinder would allow the original plaintiff to perfect jurisdiction for its claims and thereby recover its requested relief, id. at 998 ; Mullaney, 342 U.S. at 416–17.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-Larrain, 490 U.S. 826, 830 (1989); Mullaney v. Anderson, 342 U.S. 415 (1952); California Credit Union League v. City of Anaheim, 190 F.3d 997, 1000 (9th Cir. 1999).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-Larrain, 490 U.S. 826, 830 (1989); Mullaney v. Anderson, 342 U.S. 415 (1952); California Credit Union League v. City of Anaheim, 190 F.3d 997, 1000 (9th Cir. 1999).
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
See Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-Larrain, 490 U.S. 826 , 834 n. 8, 109 S.Ct. 2218 , 104 L.Ed.2d 893 (1989) (noting that, in Mullaney, "[t]he addition of the union members was considered necessary to establish the existence of a justiciable case”); cf. Prima Tek II, L.L.C. v. A-Roo Co., 222 F.3d 1372, 1381-82 (Fed.Cir. 2000); Cal. Credit Union League v. City of Anaheim, 190 F.3d 997, 999, 1001 (9th Cir. 1999).
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
Cir. 2000); Cal. Credit Union League v. City of Anaheim, 190 F.3d 997, 999, 1001 (9th Cir. 1999).
Rule Authority · Fed. Cir.
See Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-Larrain, 490 U.S. 826, 837 , 109 S.Ct. 2218 , 104 L.Ed.2d 893 (1989) (approving the use of Rule 21 by appellate courts when a change in the parties will not affect the litigation or embarrass the defendant); Cal. Credit Union League v. City of Anaheim, 190 F.3d 997, 998 (9th Cir.1999) (allowing the appellate joinder of a plaintiff to retroactively cure a jurisdictional defect).
Rule Authority · Fed. Cir.
See Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-Larrain, 490 U.S. 826, 837 (1989) (approving the use of Rule 21 by appellate courts when a change in the parties will not affect the litigation or embarrass the defendant); Cal. Credit Union League v. City of Anaheim, 190 F.3d 997, 998 (9th Cir. 1999) (allowing the appellate joinder of a plaintiff to retroactively cure a jurisdictional defect). 45 We permitted joinder of Sonique because we are not persuaded by defendants' arguments that we s…
allowing the appellate joinder of a plaintiff to retroactively cure a jurisdictional defect
Rule Authority · Fed. Cir.
See Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-Larrain, 490 U.S. 826, 837 , 109 S.Ct. 2218 , 104 L.Ed.2d 893 (1989) (approving of the appellate court’s consideration of whether the statutory requirements for diversity jurisdiction were satisfied where the issue had not been raised in the district court); Mullaney v. Anderson, 342 U.S. 415, 416 , 72 S.Ct. 428 , 96 L.Ed. 458 (1952) (considering the plaintiffs standing to bring suit where the issue was not raised in either the district cour…
Rule Authority · S.D. Cal.
The district court therefore erred in dismissing the case 3 based on a jurisdictional defect that had been cured. 4 Id. at 685 (citing Cal. Credit Union League v. City of Anaheim, 190 F.3d 997, 1001 (9th 5 Cir. 1999); Northstar Fin.
Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.
While Morongo does contain the broad statement that “subject matter jurisdiction must exist as of the time the action is commenced” and that a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction at the outset cannot be cured subsequently, it is now clear, if it was not then, that this rule is more nuanced than the inflexibility suggested by its language—both as it relates to curing jurisdictional defects through supplemental pleadings, see, e.g., Mathews 12 [v. Diaz], 426 U.S. 67 , 96 S.Ct.…
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Cal. Credit Union League v. City of Anaheim, 190 F.3d 997, 1001 (9th Cir. 1999).
Cited · Fed. Cir. · signal: see
See Cal. Credit Union League v. City of Anaheim, 190 F.3d 997, 1001 (9th Cir.1999).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See id. at 1001 .
Cited (see also) · D. Haw. · signal: see also
Advisors, Inc. v. Schwab Invs., 119 F.3d 1036, 1046 (9th Cir. 2015) (citations omitted); see also Cal. Credit Union League v. City of Anaheim, 190 F.3d 997, 1000 (9th Cir. 1999) ("[Ajppellate courts may join a party as a plaintiff to cure a jurisdictional defect when the joinder will promote judicial economy and not prejudice the defendant.”).
"[Ajppellate courts may join a party as a plaintiff to cure a jurisdictional defect when the joinder will promote judicial economy and not prejudice the defendant.”
Cited (see also) · NY · signal: see also
Because the FCUA explicitly excepts only taxation upon real and tangible personal property, and the MET does not fall into either category, collection of the MET from plaintiff Hudson Valley is foreclosed (see Bismarck, 314 US at 99 ; see also California Credit Union League v City of Anaheim, 95 F3d 30, 31-32 [9th Cir 1996] [employees of federal credit unions immune under section 1768 from city’s transient occupancy tax while in the city on business], vacated on other ground…