Cluster 766169 (1999)
green
· 45 citation events
across 12 courts.
Showing the 19 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199920122026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Robert Wilson v. David Spain, Mike Jones (2000)
See Brandt v. Davis, 191 F.3d 887 , 891 (8th Cir.1999).
green
Migliaccio v. K-Tel International, Inc. (2002)
See Brandt v. Davis, 191 F.3d 887 , 893 (8th Cir.1999) (finding no abuse of discretion where party failed to “explain how he would amend the complaint to save the claim”); Wisdom v. First Midwest Bank, of Poplar Bluff, 167 F.3d 402, 409 (8th Cir.1999) (“parties should not be allowed to amend their complaint without showing how the complaint could be amended to save the meritless claim”).
green
Robert Wilson v. David Spain (2000)
See Brandt v. Davis, 191 F.3d 887 , 891 (8th Cir. 1999).
See Brandt v. Davis, 191 F.3d 887 , 893 (8th Cir.1999.) (finding no abuse of discretion where party failed to “explain how he would amend the complaint to save the claim”); Wisdom v. First Midwest Bank, of Poplar Bluff, 167 F.3d 402, 409 (8th Cir.1999) (stating “parties should not be allowed to amend their complaint without showing how the complaint could be amended to save the merit-less claim”).
See Brandt v. Davis, 191 F.3d 887 , 893 (8th Cir.1999) (“In Brandt’s motion to amend before the district court, and in his argument on appeal, he neglected to explain how he would amend the complaint to save the claim.
See Brandt v. Davis, 191 F.3d 887 , 893 (8th Cir.1999) (“In Brandt’s motion to amend before the district court, and in his argument on appeal, he neglected to explain how he would amend the complaint to save the claim.
green
Ellen Reasonover v. St. Louis County (2006)
See Brandt v. Davis, 191 F.3d 887 , 891 (8th Cir.1999).
green
Reasonover v. St. Louis County (2006)
See Brandt v. Davis, 191 F.3d 887 , 891 (8th Cir.1999).
green
Jeffrey Barstad v. Murray County (2005)
See Brandt v. Davis, 191 F.3d 887 , 891 (8th Cir. 1999).
green
Jeffrey Barstad v. Murray County (2005)
See Brandt v. Davis, 191 F.3d 887 , 891 (8th Cir.1999).
green
No. 02-3519 (2003)
See, e.g., Brandt v. Davis, 191 F.3d 887 , 891 (8th Cir.1999) (affirming grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants in an excessive force case because plaintiff failed to submit any evidence contradicting defendants' version of the incident).
green
Sybil Hernandez v. Brett Jarman (2003)
See, e.g., Brandt v. Davis, 191 F.3d 887 , 891 (8th Cir.1999) (affirming grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants in an excessive force case because plaintiff failed to submit any evidence contradicting defendants’ version of the incident).
green
Meehan v. United Consumers Club Franchising Corp. (2002)
See Brandt v. Davis, 191 F.3d 887 , 893 (8th Cir.1999) (finding no abuse of discretion where party failed "to explain how he would amend the complaint to save the claim").
green
Meehan v. United Consumers Club Franchising Corp. (2002)
See Brandt v. Davis, 191 F.3d 887 , 893 (8th Cir.1999) (finding no abuse of discretion where party failed “to explain how he would amend the complaint to save the claim”).
green
In Re: K-Tel International, Inc. Securities Litigation Pasquale Migliaccio Creative Care Corporation Glen Reu… (2002)
See Brandt v. Davis, 191 F.3d 887 , 893 (8th Cir.1999) (finding no abuse of discretion where party failed to "explain how he would amend the complaint to save the claim"); Wisdom v. First Midwest Bank, of Poplar Bluff, 167 F.3d 402, 409 (8th Cir.1999) ("parties should not be allowed to amend their complaint without showing how the complaint could be amended to save the meritless claim"). 90 Under the circumstances presented, we find the abuse of discretion standard is applic…
green
Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, Realm of Missouri, and Michael Cuffley v. Curators of the University of Missouri… (2000)
See Brandt v. Davis, 191 F.3d 887 , 891 (8th Cir. 1999).
See Brandt v. Davis, 191 F.3d 887 , 891 (8th Cir.1999).
green
Smith v. Kilgore (2017)
(See for example the discussion on page 11-12, infra) The Eighth Circuit has repeatedly stated that “in opposing a motion for summary judgment, a nonmoving party may not rely on mere denials or allegations in its pleadings, but must designate specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.” Hernandez v. Jarman, 340 F.3d 617, 622 (8th Cir. 2003); see also Brandt v. Davis, 191 F.3d 887 , 891 (8th Cir. 1999) (finding that a party’s failure to “submit even a shre…
finding that a party’s failure to “submit even a shred of evidence” to contradict evidence presented by the movant required the Court to find the facts, as presented by the movant, uncontroverted
green
Casciani v. Nesbitt (2009)
See Brandt v. Davis, 191 F.3d 887 , 893 (8th Cir.1999) (plaintiffs allegation that city failed to enforce zoning laws against her neighbor did not show purposeful discrimination against plaintiff for purposes of equal protection claim).