Kim Ho Ma v. Janet Reno (2000)
green
· 96 citation events
across 20 courts.
Showing the 17 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200020132026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
yellow
Mario Rosales-Garcia v. J.T. Holland, Warden (2001)
Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. at 270-271 . 14 Despite the fact that the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments have a "territorial theme" and, therefore, apply "'to all persons within the territory of the United States,'" Plyler, 457 at 212, some courts have held that excludable aliens may rely upon the Constitution to challenge "governmental action outside of the immigration context." Fernandez-Roque v. Smith, 734 F.2d 576 , 582 n.8 (11th Cir. 1984); see also Gisbert, 988 F.2d…
"[I]t is not settled that excludable aliens have any constitutional rights at all[.]"
yellow
In Re Resendiz (2001)
For example, some 1,750 legatees of the Mariel evacuation from Cuba have languished indefinitely in federal prisons ( Rosales-Garcia v. Holland (6th Cir.2001) 238 F.3d 704, 711 ) without constitutional remedy, and without being accused of any crime. ( Carrera-Valdez v. Perryman (7th Cir.2000) 211 F.3d 1046, 1048 ; but see Kim Ho Ma v. Reno (9th Cir.2000) 208 F.3d 815, 821-822 [such detention barred by statute], cert, granted sub nom.
green
Zadvydas v. Davis (2001)
Id., at 818.
green
Mario Rosales-Garcia v. J.T. Holland, Warden, Reynero Arteaga Carballo v. Mark Luttrell, Warden Immigration a… (2003)
See, e.g., Carrera-Valdez, 211 F.3d at 1048 (stating that the Mezei Court "held that an excludable alien may be detained indefinitely when his country of origin will not accept his return"); Kim Ho Ma, 208 F.3d at 823 ("[T]he Court held that Mezei could be detained indefinitely on Ellis Island.").
"[T]he Court held that Mezei could be detained indefinitely on Ellis Island."
green
Kim Ho Ma v. Ashcroft (2001)
In light of the above clarification, and to make our earlier holding clear, we amend our opinion by deleting the sentence, 208 F.3d at 831, that reads: In the absence of a repatriation agreement, extant or pending, we must affirm the district court’s finding that there is no reasonable likelihood that the INS will be able to accomplish Ma’s removal.
green
Kim Ho Ma v. John D. Ashcroft (2001)
In our prior opinion, we affirmed, and we reaffirm here, the District Court's finding that, under all the circumstances, there was no likelihood of Ma's removal in the foreseeable future. 4 In light of the above clarification, and to make our earlier holding clear, we amend our opinion by deleting the sentence, 208 F.3d at 831, that reads: 5 In the absence of a repatriation agreement, extant or pending, we must affirm the district court's finding that there is no reasonable …
green
Gato-Herrera v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (2001)
Ma concluded that Congress intended nothing different when it enacted the Immigration and Nationalities Act in 1952 and later amended it through IIRIRA. 208 F.3d at 828-29.
green
Tuan Thai, Also Known as Anh Tuan Thai, Also Known as Anh Thai Tuan v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General (2004)
See Ma v. Reno, 208 F.3d 815 (9th Cir.2000).
green
Benitez v. Wallis (2003)
See Kim Ho Ma v. Reno, 208 F.3d 815 (9th Cir.2000). .
green
Sildora v. Ashcroft (2001)
See Ma v. Reno, 208 F.3d 815 (9th Cir.2000). .
green
Ivan Boz v. United States (2000)
See Ma v. Reno, 208 F.3d 815 , 818-19 & n. 3 (9th Cir.2000), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 297 (2000); Ho v. Greene, 204 F.3d 1045 , 1050-52 (10th Cir.2000); Zadvydas v. Underdown, 185 F.3d 279, 285-86 (5th Cir.1999), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 297 (2000); cf. Parra v. Perryman, 172 F.3d 954, 956-57 (7th Cir.1999) (district courts have jurisdiction under § 2241 to consider *1294 validity of statute authorizing detention of alien, even when removal proceedings ar…
green
Miguel Noel Fierro v. Janet Reno, Attorney General, Miguel Noel Fierro v. Janet Reno, Attorney General (2000)
Compare Ma v. Reno, 208 F.3d 815 (9th Cir.2000), with Ho v. Greene, 204 F.3d 1045 (10th Cir.2000).
green
Fierro v. INS (2000)
Compare Ma v. Reno, 208 F.3d 815 (9th Cir. 2000), with Ho v. Greene, 204 F.3d 1045 (10th Cir. 2000).
green
Hernandez Nodarse v. United States (2001)
See 208 F.3d 815, 818, 830-31 (9th Cir.2000), vacated, — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 2491 , 150 L.Ed.2d 653 (2001).
green
Spencer Enterprises, Inc. v. United States (2001)
See Ma v. Reno, 208 F.3d 815 , 825 (9th Cir.2000), cert. granted, 531 U.S. 924 , 121 S.Ct. 297 , 148 L.Ed.2d 239 (U.S. Oct. 10, 2000) (No. 00-38) (quoting Ba rrera-Echavarria v. Rison, 44 F.3d 1441, 1449 (9th Cir.1995) (en banc)); cf. Leng May Ma v. Barber, 357 U.S. 185, 187 , 78 S.Ct. 1072 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1246 (1958) (“[O]ur immigration laws have long made a. distinction between those aliens who have come to our shores seeking admission, ... and those who are within the United …
No. 00-38
green
Emery Worldwide Airlines, Inc. v. United States (2001)
See, e.g., Ma v. Reno, 208 F.3d 815 , 821-22 (9th Cir.2000).
Compare Ma v. Reno, 208 F.3d 815 (9th Cir.2000) (holding INS lacks statutory authority to indefinitely detain aliens), cert. granted, — U.S. —, 121 S.Ct. 297 , 148 L.Ed.2d 239 (2000), and Hermanowski v. Farquharson, 39 F.Supp.2d 148 (D.R.I.1999) (indefinite detention violates substantive due process) with Ho v. Greene, 204 F.3d 1045 (10th Cir.2000) (Attorney General may permissibly detain alien indefinitely) and Zadvydas v. Underdown, 185 F.3d 279 (5th Cir.1999) (same), cert…