Action Group v. Deason (1993)
green
· 2 citation events
across 1 courts.
Showing the 2 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
So. States Util. v. FLA. PUB. SERV. COM'N (1998)
In support of their contention that "capband rates" are unfairly discriminatory, the cross-appellants (with the exception of the Office of Public Counsel) cite Action Group v. Deason, 615 So.2d 683, 686 (Fla. 1993) ("The only issue presented in this appeal is whether the Public Service Commission has subject matter jurisdiction to approve the proposed Sebring rider."), and Wabash Valley Electric Co. v. Young, 287 U.S. 488 , 53 S.Ct. 234 , 77 L.Ed. 447 (1933) (holding that st…
"The only issue presented in this appeal is whether the Public Service Commission has subject matter jurisdiction to approve the proposed Sebring rider."
In support of their contention that “capband rates” are unfairly discriminatory, the cross-appellants (with the exception of the Office of Public Counsel) cite Action Group v. Deason, 615 So.2d 683, 686 (Fla.1993) (“The only issue presented in this appeal is whether the Public Service Commission has subject matter jurisdiction to approve the proposed Sebring rider.”), and Wabash Valley Electric Co. v. Young, 287 U.S. 488, 53 S.Ct. 234 , 77 L.Ed. 447 (1933) (holding that stat…