Snake River Valley Electric Association v. Pacificorp, (Including Utah Power and Light Company, a Division), and State of Idaho, Defendant-Intervenor (2001)
green
· 25 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 8 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200020132026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Snake River Valley Electric Association v. Pacificorp, (Including Utah Power & Light, a Division), State of I… (2004)
We recognized this fact in Snake River I, noting that “SRVEA not only asks PacifiCorp to wheel power, but also seeks PacifiCorp’s consent to provide power to PacifiCorp’s customers.” 238 F.3d at 1191 (emphasis in original).
emphasis in original
green
Costco Wholesale v. Hoen (2008)
Ass’n, 238 F.3d at 1194 (“There is no reason, for example, to require state supervision of law that prescribes the percentage over wholesale that an alcohol retailer can charge.
“There is no reason, for example, to require state supervision of law that prescribes the percentage over wholesale that an alcohol retailer can charge. The amount is a simple calculation that the retailer has no discre- tion to alter.”
green
Costco Wholesale v. Hoen (2008)
Ass’n v. PacifiCorp, 238 F.3d 1189 , 1192 n.8 (9th Cir. 2001) (“The Court has not clearly defined the relationship between federal antitrust preemption of state laws restricting competition and the state action immunity doctrine.”) (internal citations omit- ted).
“The Court has not clearly defined the relationship between federal antitrust preemption of state laws restricting competition and the state action immunity doctrine.”
green
Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Maleng (2008)
Ass’n, 238 F.3d at 1194 (“There is no reason, for example, to require state supervision of law that prescribes the percentage over wholesale that an alcohol retailer can charge.
“There is no reason, for example, to require state supervision of law that prescribes the percentage over wholesale that an alcohol retailer can charge. The amount is a simple calculation that the retailer has no discretion to alter.”
green
Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Maleng (2008)
Ass'n, 238 F.3d at 1194 ("There is no reason, for example, to require state supervision of law that prescribes the percentage over wholesale that an alcohol retailer can charge.
"There is no reason, for example, to require state supervision of law that prescribes the percentage over wholesale that an alcohol retailer can charge. The amount is a simple calculation that the retailer has no discretion to alter."
green
Sanders v. Brown (2007)
Ass’n. v. Pacificorp, 238 F.3d 1189, 1192-95 (9th Cir.2001).
green
Sanders v. Lockyers (2007)
Ass’n. v. Pacificorp, 238 F.3d 1189, 1192-95 (9th Cir. 2001).
green
Snake River Valley Electric Association v. Pacificorp, (Including Utah Power and Light Company, a Division), … (2000)
SEE NEW OPINION AT 238 F.3d 1189 .