James F. Fritz, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs (2001)
green
· 43 citation events
across 4 courts.
Showing the 15 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200220142026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Wagner v. Shinseki (2011)
Kelly, 463 F.3d at 1353 (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). “[A]n award of fees incurred in every stage of litigation is consistent with the legislative purpose of the EAJA----” Fritz v. Principi, 264 F.3d 1372, 1377 (Fed.Cir.2001).
Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Serv. v. Jean, 496 U.S. 154, 161 , 110 S.Ct. 2316 , 110 L.Ed.2d 134 (1990) (a “fee award presumptively encompasses all aspects of the civil action,” including appeals over fees); Fritz v. Principi, 264 F.3d 1372, 1376-77 (Fed.Cir.2001).
green
Roberson v. Principi (2002)
Fritz, 264 F.3d 1372, 1377 (Fed.
holding that, once established that EAJA fees were to be awarded, appellant "was entitled to attorney fees incurred throughout the litigation, including those incurred in preparation and defense of the fee application to the extent those fees are defensible"
green
Supplycore Inc. v. United States (2022)
See Fritz v. Principi, 264 F.3d 1372, 1377 (Fed.
“[Plaintiff] was entitled to attorney fees . . . incurred in preparation and defense of the fee application to the extent those fees are defensible.”
green
Agma Security Service, Inc. v. United States (2022)
Similarly, in Fritz v. Principi, 264 F.3d 1372 , regarding the calculation of fees for work on the EAJA claim, the Federal Circuit has indicated that, for work on the case at issue, a protestor is “entitled to attorney fees incurred throughout the litigation, including those incurred in preparation and defense of the fee application to the extent those fees are defensible.” Id. at 1377 (footnote omitted); see also Info.
footnote omitted
green
Agma Security Service, Inc. v. United States (2022)
Similarly, in Fritz v. Principi, 264 F.3d 1372 , regarding the calculation of fees for work on the EAJA claim, the Federal Circuit has indicated that, for work on the case at issue, a protestor is “entitled to attorney fees incurred throughout the litigation, including those incurred in preparation and defense of the fee application to the extent those fees are defensible.” Id. at 1377 (footnote omitted); see also Info.
footnote omitted
green
Brass v. United States (2016)
Cir. 2011) (“Wagner I”) (citing Comm’r, Immigration & Naturalization Serv. v. Jean, 496 U.S. 154, 161-62 , 110 S.Ct. 2316 , 110 L.Ed.2d 134 (1990); Fritz v. Principi, 264 F.3d 1372, 1377 (Fed.
green
Wollman v. United States (2015)
Cir. 2011) (citing Fritz v. Principi, 264 F.3d 1372, 1377 (Fed.
Such fees are permissible in principle under EAJA, see, e.g., Fritz v. Principi, 264 F.3d 1372, 1377 (Fed.Cir.2001); Keely v. Merit Systems Protection Bd., 793 F.2d 1273, 1275 (Fed.Cir.1986).
green
Metropolitan Van & Storage, Inc. v. United States (2011)
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit also has indicated that a plaintiff is “entitled to attorney fees incurred throughout the litigation, including those incurred in preparation and defense of the fee application to the extent those fees are defensible.” Fritz v. Principi 264 F.3d at 1377 (footnote omitted); see also Info.
footnote omitted
green
Information Sciences Corp. v. United States (2009)
Fritz v. Principi, 264 F.3d 1372, 1377 (Fed.Cir.2001) (“[Plaintiff] was entitled to attorney fees ... incurred in preparation and defense of the fee application to the extent those fees are defensible.”).
green
Filtration Development Co., LLC v. United States (2005)
Jean, 496 U.S. at 156 , 110 S.Ct. 2316 ; Lion Raisins, 57 Fed.Cl. at 519 n. 17 (citing Fritz v. Principi, 264 F.3d 1372, 1376-77 (Fed.Cir.2001)); KMS Fusion, 39 Fed.Cl. at 603 (citing Schuenemeyer v. United States, 776 F.2d 329, 333 (Fed.Cir.1985)).
green
Lion Raisins, Inc. v. United States (2003)
Fritz v. Principi, 264 F.3d 1372, 1376-77 (Fed.Cir.2001) (discussing Jean, 496 U.S. 154 , 110 S.Ct. 2316 ). .
green
Fritz v. Principi (2002)
Fritz v. Principi, 264 F.3d 1372, 1377 (Fed.Cir.2001).
green
Dellew Corporation v. United States (2016)
Schuenemeyer v. United States, 776 F.2d 329, 333 (Fed.Cir.1985); accord Fritz v. Principi, 264 F.3d 1372, 1377 (Fed.Cir.2001); Brewer v. Am.