Cluster 774961 (2001)
green
· 262 citation events
across 20 courts.
Showing the 50 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200120132026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Ctr for Biological Diversity v. Ryan Zinke (2017)
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’n v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir. 2001) (quoting Motor Vehicle Mfrs.
quoting Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass’n v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43 , 103 S.Ct. 2856 , 77 L.Ed.2d 443 (1983)
green
Defenders of Wildlife v. Ryan Zinke (2017)
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’ns, Inc. v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir. 2001) (quoting 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2)(A)).
quoting 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2)(A)
Coast Fed’n of Fisherman’s Ass’ns v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir. 2001))).
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’ns, Inc. v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir.2001) (quoting Motor Vehicle Mfrs.
green
Bark v. Lisa Northrop (2015)
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’n, Inc. v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1031-32, 1034 (9th Cir.2001).
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’ns v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir.2001)).
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’ns v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir.2001) (quoting Motor Vehicle Mfrs.
green
Rock Creek Alliance v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (2011)
Contra Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’ns v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1035-37 (9th Cir.2001) (finding that the National Marine Fisheries Service did not appropriately evaluate the localized impact of the project in issuing their “no jeopardy” opinion).
green
Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Cen v. Patricia Grantham (2011)
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’ns, Inc. v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1036-38 (9th Cir. 2001) (evaluating whether a proposed project was “consistent” with the ACS objectives); Or.
evaluating whether a proposed project was “consistent” with the ACS objectives
green
Sierra Forest Products, Inc. v. Dirk Kempthorne (2010)
Pacific Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’ns, Inc. v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir.2001) (noting that “we must ask whether the agency considered the relevant factors and articulated a rational connection between the facts found and the choice made”) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see also Kunaknana v. Clark, 742 F.2d 1145, 1149 (9th Cir.1984) (noting that it is not an impermissible post-hoc rationalization to allow an agency to e…
Cf. PCFFA Appeal, 265 F.3d at 1033-34 (“[T]he issuance of a biological opinion marks the ‘consummation’ of NMFS’s consultation process.”) In Bennett , the United States Supreme Court held that a BO and accompanying Incidental Take Statement (ITS) constituted final agency action in that they “altered] the legal regime to which the action agency is subject, authorizing it to take the endangered species if (but only if) it complies with the prescribed conditions.” 520 U.S. at 1…
“[T]he issuance of a biological opinion marks the ‘consummation’ of NMFS’s consultation process.”
Coast Fed. of Fishermen’s Ass’n, Inc. v. Nat’l Marine 13 Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir. 2001) [hereinafter PCFFA]. 14 C.
green
Western Watersheds Project v. Perdue (2023)
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’n, Inc. v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 12 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir. 2001) (quoting Motor Vehicle Mfrs.
quoting Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass’n of U.S., Inc. v. 13 State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43 (1983)
Coast Fed’n v. NMFS, 265 F.3d 1028, 1037-38 (9th Cir.2001)); see also Nat’l Wildlife Fed’n v. NMFS, 524 F.3d 917, 934-35 (9th Cir.2008) (finding biological opinion “did not adequately demonstrate that [the impacts of the planned mitigation] would not affect the fishes’ survival and recovery, in light of their short life-cycles and current extremely poor habitat conditions”).
green
League of Wilderness Defenders/Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. United States Forest Service (2012)
PCFFA II, 265 F.3d at 1037 ("Under the practice adopted by NMFS, only degradations that persist more than a decade and are measurable at the watershed scale will be considered to degrade aquatic habitat.
green
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. Salazar (2009)
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’ns v. NMFS, 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir.2001).
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’ns, Inc. v. Nat’l Marine 22 Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1033 (9th Cir. 2001).
green
Skagit County Dike Drainage and Irrigation Improvement District No 12 v. National Marine Fisheries Service (2025)
Coast Fed. 8 of Fishermen's Ass'n v. NMFS, 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir. 2001) (internal quotations and 9 citations omitted); Greater Yellowstone Coal., Inc. v. Servheen, 665 F.3d 1015, 1023 (9th Cir. 10 2011).
internal quotations and 9 citations omitted
green
Perez v. Duke (2021)
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’n, Inc. v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 18 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir. 2001) (quoting Motor Vehicle Mfrs.
quoting Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass’n v. State Farm 19 Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43 (1983)
green
Cleveland v. United States Department of Agriculture (2020)
Coast Fed'n of Fishermen's Ass'ns, Inc. v. Nat'l 18 Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1033 (9th Cir. 2001). 19 Plaintiff seeks to enjoin preliminarily and to stay 2021 USDA/California Specialty Crop Block 20 Grant funding through the USDA Agriculture Marketing Service pending judicial review.
green
Cleveland v. United States Department of Agriculture (2020)
Coast Fed'n of Fishermen's Ass'ns, Inc. v. Nat'l 18 Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1033 (9th Cir. 2001). 19 Plaintiff seeks to enjoin preliminarily and to stay 2021 USDA/California Specialty Crop Block 20 Grant funding through the USDA Agriculture Marketing Service pending judicial review.
green
Friends of the Bitterroot v. Marten (2020)
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’n v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir. 2001), based on a site-specific characteristic.6 As for the hiding cover standard, the Forest Service asserted that “changes in the landscape”—presumably, the “widespread dense regeneration resulting from the 2000 Valley Complex Wildfire”—supported the amendment.
green
Oceana, Inc. v. Ross (2020)
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’ns, Inc. v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 3 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir. 2001) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). 4 Nonetheless, “to withstand review the agency must articulate a rational connection 5 between the facts found and the conclusions reached.” Bosworth, 510 F.3d at 1023 (brackets and 6 internal quotation marks omitted).
internal quotation marks and citations omitted
green
Cleveland v. United States Department of Agriculture (2020)
Coast Fed'n of Fishermen's Ass'ns, Inc. v. Nat'l 3 Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1033 (9th Cir. 2001). 4 Plaintiff seeks Court intervention in his administrative case with the USDA and the National 5 Appeals Division.
green
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Christensen (2020)
Coast Fed’n of Fisherman’s Ass’n, Inc., 265 F.3d at 1034 (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).
citations and internal quotation marks omitted
green
State of California v. Bureau of Land Management (2020)
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’n, Inc. v. Nat’l 9 Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir. 2001) (quoting State Farm, 463 U.S. at 43). 10 The agency’s findings are reviewed under the “substantial evidence” standard.
quoting State Farm, 463 U.S. at 43
Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028 (9th Cir. 2001) (“Agency decisions under ESA are governed by the Administrative Procedure Act, which requires an agency action to be upheld unless it is found to be ‘arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law’”); W.
“Agency decisions under ESA are governed by the Administrative Procedure Act, which requires an agency action to be upheld unless it is found to be ‘arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law’”
green
Cascadia Wildlands v. Bureau of Land Management (2019)
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’n v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1036 (9th Cir. 2001); see also Oregon Natural Resource Council v. Brong, 492 F.3d 1120, 1130 (9th Cir. 2007) (holding that the agency improperly diluted the effects of its proposed actions by averaging snag retention over too wide an area).
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’n v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir. 2001) (“Agency action should be overturned only when the agency has ‘relied on factors which Congress has not intended it to consider, entirely failed to consider an important aspect of the problem, offered an explanation for its decision that runs counter to the evidence before the agency, or is so implausible that it could not be ascribed to a difference in view or the product o…
green
Center for Biological Diversity v. Jewell (2017)
Pacific Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’ns, Inc. v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir. 2001).
green
Commonwealth Utilities Corp. v. Johnson (2016)
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’ns v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir. 2001).
green
Center for Environmental Health v. McCarthy (2016)
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’n v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir.2001).
green
Center for Biological Diversity v. Gould (2015)
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’n v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir.2001) (citation omitted).
green
Wildearth Guardians v. Jewel (2015)
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’ns, Inc. v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir.2001) (quoting 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2)(A)). .
green
Greater Yellowstone Coalition v. U.S. Forest Service (2014)
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’n, Inc. v. NMFS, 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir.2001).
green
Natural Resources Defense Council v. Pritzker (2014)
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’n, v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir.2001).
green
Oceana, Inc. v. Bryson (2013)
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’ns, Inc. v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir.2001) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).
Coast Fed. of Fishermen’s Ass’ns v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1035-37 (9th Cir.2001)).
green
Native Ecosystems Council & Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. United States Forest Service ex rel. Davey (2012)
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’n, Inc. v. NMFS, 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir.2001).
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’ns v. NMFS, 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir.2001).
An agency action will be upheld so long as it correctly applied the law and “considered the relevant factors and articulated a rational connection between the facts found and the choice made.” Pacific Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’ns v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir.2001) (citation omitted).
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’n, Inc. v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir.2001).
Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028 (9th Cir.2001), where it held that “only final agency decisions are subject to review under the APA.” Id. at 1033.
green
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. Salazar (2010)
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’ns v. NMFS, 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir.2001) (“PCFFA I”).
green
Native Village of Point Hope v. Salazar (2010)
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen's Ass’ns, Inc. v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir.2001) (quoting Motor Vehicle Mfrs.
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’ns v. NMFS, 265 F.3d 1028, 1036-37 (9th Cir.2001) (analysis on a large spatial scale insufficient to support no-jeopardy opinion where scale would ignore “projects with a relatively small area of impact but that carried a high risk of degradation,” which might have significant aggregate impacts).
green
Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. Tidwell (2010)
Coast Fed’n of Fisherman’s Ass’ns v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1034-35 (9th Cir.2001).
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’n v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir.2001) (internal quotations omitted). 1.
green
Grand Canyon Trust v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (2009)
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’n v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir.2001).
Coast Fed’n of Fishermen’s Ass’ns v. NMFS, 265 F.3d 1028, 1034 (9th Cir.2001) (“PCFFA”).