Cluster 775801 (2001)
green
· 141 citation events
across 18 courts.
Showing the 50 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200120132026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
Basic Energy, 273 F.3d at 663. .
green
Liberte Capital Group, LLC v. Capwill (2005)
Basic Energy, 273 F.3d at 660.
green
H. Davis v. Lifetime Capital, Inc. (2018)
Even in exercising its “broad powers and wide discretion” in an equity receivership proceeding, Basic, 273 F.3d at 668, “the court ‘must still provide the claimants with due process.’” Liberte, 421 F.3d at 382 (6th Cir. 2005) (quoting Basic, 273 F.3d at 668).
green
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, AND KAREN LYNN BENSON P.J. BRIX, LLC, CLAIMANTS-APPELLANTS v. CAPITAL CON… (2006)
LLC, 242 F.3d 325, 330-31 (5th Cir. 2001) (same). 19 Basic Energy, 273 F.3d at 663. 20 Id. at 664-65. 21 Id. 22 Id. at 665. 23 Id. 24 In this case, the problem was perhaps less extreme, partly because there were fewer orders from which to choose.
green
Benson v. Lennon (2006)
LLC, 242 F.3d 325, 330-31 (5th Cir. 2001) (same). 19 Basic Energy, 273 F.3d at 663. 20 Id. at 664-65. 7662 BENSON v. LENNON After carefully evaluating the two orders cited by the parties, the court concluded that neither order finally resolved the claim in question.21 After examining the record, however, the court concluded that a third order issued by the district court after the appeal was taken — and never cited by the parties — did so.22 Moreover, the court concluded tha…
Trust Co., 559 F.3d 649, 652 (7th Cir.2009); Basic Energy, 273 F.3d at 670 (“Thus, the district court used its discretion in a logical way to divide the money, and therefore, did not abuse its discretion in approving the plan.”).
“Thus, the district court used its discretion in a logical way to divide the money, and therefore, did not abuse its discretion in approving the plan.”
green
Quilling v. Trade Partners, Inc. (2009)
S.E.C. v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Res., Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 668 (6th Cir.2001).
green
Michael Quilling v. Trade Partners, Inc. (2009)
S.E.C. v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Res., Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 668 (6th Cir. 2001).
green
Norwest Bank Wisconsin, N.A. v. Malachi Corp. (2007)
Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 668 (6th Cir.2001).
green
In re Murray Energy Holdings Co. (2021)
The Panel requested and received supplemental briefs on CONSOL’s appellate standing as the Panel is “under an independent obligation to police [its] own jurisdiction.” S.E.C. v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Res., Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 665 (6th Cir. 2001).
green
MW Capital Funding, Inc. v. Magnum Health & Rehab (2020)
“In a receivership proceeding, the district court has ‘broad powers and wide discretion’ in crafting relief.” Quilling v. Trade Partners, Inc., 572 F.3d 293, 298 (6th Cir. 2009) (quoting S.E.C. v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Res., Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 668 (6th Cir. 2001)).
green
Edwin Avery v. United States (2019)
Even if the parties fail to address jurisdiction in their briefs, “we are under an independent obligation to police our own jurisdiction.” Bonner v. Perry, 564 F.3d 424, 426 (6th Cir. 2009) (quoting S.E.C. v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Res., Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 665 (6th Cir. 2001)).
green
Marvin Allen v. NCL America LLC (2018)
A. Neither party has challenged our jurisdiction in this case, but we have “an independent obligation to police our own jurisdiction.” Bonner v. Perry, 564 F.3d 424, 426 (6th Cir. 2009) (quoting S.E.C. v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Res., Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 665 (6th Cir. 2001)).
Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 668 (6th Cir. 2001).
green
Abdoulaye Bary v. Eric H. Holder, Jr. (2009)
Although the Government in the instant case did not address jurisdiction with respect to the IJ’s finding that Bary failed to establish timeliness, “ ‘we are under an independent obligation to police our own jurisdiction,’ and thus we can raise the issue of jurisdiction sua sponte.” Bonner v. Perry, 564 F.3d 424, 426 (6th Cir.2009) (quoting S.E.C. v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Res., Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 665 (6th Cir.2001)).
green
Sha'rewa Bonner v. David Perry (2009)
S.E.C. v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Res., Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 665 (6th Cir. 2001).2 With certain limited exceptions not applicable here, we have jurisdiction only over appeals from final decisions of a district court. 28 U.S.C. § 1291 .
green
Bonner v. Perry (2009)
S.E.C. v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Res., Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 665 (6th Cir.2001). 2 With certain limited exeep *427 tions not applicable here, we have jurisdiction only over appeals from final decisions of a district court. 28 U.S.C. § 1291 .
See SEC v. Wang, 944 F.2d 80 , 84-85 (2d Cir.1991); SEC v. Elliott, 953 F.2d 1560 , 1566 (11th Cir.1992); Forex Asset Management, 242 F.3d at 331 ; Basic Energy, 273 F.3d at 670-71.
green
City of Cleveland v. Ohio (2007)
The court will address both issues because it is “under an independent obligation to police [its] own jurisdiction.” S.E.C. v. Basic Energy & Affiliated, Resources, Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 665 (6th Cir.2001); see also Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 498 , 95 S.Ct. 2197 , 45 L.Ed.2d 343 (1975) (stating that standing is a “threshold question in every federal case”); Zurich Ins.
green
City of Cleveland v. State of OH (2007)
The court will address both issues because it is “under an independent obligation to police [its] own jurisdiction.” S.E.C. v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Resources, Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 665 (6th Cir. 2001); see also Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 498 (1975) (stating that standing is a “threshold question in every federal case”); Zurich Ins.
green
SEC v. Sharp Capital Inc (2003)
Id. at 668.
Id. at 668.
green
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sharp Capital, Inc., a Texas Corporation, Ralph S. Janvey, on Behalf of… (2003)
Id. at 668.
green
Phillips v. Weissert (In Re Phillips) (2010)
S.E.C. v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Res., Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 665 (6th Cir.2001).
green
State Ex Rel. Abraham Linc. Corp. v. Bedell (2004)
We raise this standing issue sua sponte, as the law requires.”); Chong v. District Director, I.N.S., 264 F.3d 378, 383 (3rd Cir.2001) ("[CJourts must decide ... standing issues, even when not raised by the parties, before turning to the merits.”); S.E.C. v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Resources, Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 665 (6th Cir.2001) ("The litigants in the present case have not raised the issue of the movants’ standing to appeal the orders of the district court, but we raise t…
S.E.C. v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Res., Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 668 (6th Cir.2001).
green
Milligan v. May (2025)
Grp., LLC v. Capwill, 462 F.3d 543 , 552 (6th Cir, 2006) (“The district court may require all such claims to be brought before the receivership court for disposition pursuant to summary process consistent with the equity purpose of the court.” (citing SEC, Mosburg v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Resources, Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 668 (6th Cir. 2001))); SEC v. Peterson, 129 F.4th 599 , 615-16 (9th Cir. 2025) (taking into account the cost of defending potential equitable indemnificat…
green
White v. Dave Dennis Inc. (2022)
Even if the parties fail to address jurisdiction in their briefs, "we are under an independent obligation to police our own jurisdiction." Bonner v. Perry, 564 F.3d 424, 426 (6th Cir. 2009) (quoting S.E.C. v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Res., Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 665 (6th Cir. 2001)).
green
Nalls v. State of Ohio (2022)
Even if the parties fail to address jurisdiction in their briefs, "we are under an independent obligation to police our own jurisdiction." Bonner v. Perry, 564 F.3d 424, 426 (6th Cir. 2009) (quoting S.E.C. v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Res., Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 665 (6th Cir. 2001)).
green
Nalls v. State of Ohio (2022)
Even if the parties fail to address jurisdiction in their briefs, "we are under an independent obligation to police our own jurisdiction." Bonner v. Perry, 564 F.3d 424, 426 (6th Cir. 2009) (quoting S.E.C. v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Res., Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 665 (6th Cir. 2001)).
Even if the parties fail to address jurisdiction in their briefs, "we are under an independent obligation to police our own jurisdiction." Bonner v. Perry, 564 F.3d 424, 426 (6th Cir. 2009) (quoting S.E.C. v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Res., Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 665 (6th Cir. 2001)).
green
Cooper v. Warden, Orient Correctional Institution (2020)
Even if the parties fail to address jurisdiction in their briefs, "we are under an independent obligation to police our own jurisdiction." Bonner v. Perry, 564 F.3d 424, 426 (6th Cir. 2009) (quoting S.E.C. v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Res., Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 665 (6th Cir. 2001)).
Even if the parties fail to address jurisdiction in their briefs, "we are under an independent obligation to police our own jurisdiction." Bonner v. Perry, 564 F.3d 424, 426 (6th Cir. 2009) (quoting S.E.C. v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Res., Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 665 (6th Cir. 2001)).
green
Teixeira v. McDermott (2020)
See also In re Miller, 2012 WL 6719421 at * 4 (6th Cir. Dec. 27, 2012); S.E.C. v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Res., Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 665 (6th Cir. 2001).
green
Ronald Alan Brown v. (2014)
Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 665 (6th Cir. 2001).
green
Meridian Venture v. (2013)
S.E.C. v. Basic Energy, 273 F.3d 657, 665 (6th Cir. 2001).
green
In re: Cecil Miller v. (2012)
It is appropriate for the Panel to raise the issue of standing sua sponte.1 S.E.C. v. Basic Energy, 273 F.3d 657, 665 (6th Cir. 2001).
green
In re: Nicole Phillips v. (2010)
S.E.C. v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Res., Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 665 (6th Cir. 2001).
green
In re: Louis D. Amir v. (2010)
An appellate court must therefore raise the issue of standing sua sponte because it is “under an independent obligation to police its own jurisdiction.” Basic Energy, 273 F.3d at 665.
green
Simon v. Amir (In Re Amir) (2010)
An appellate court must therefore raise the issue of standing sua sponte because it is “under an independent obligation to police its own jurisdiction.” Basic Energy, 273 F.3d at 665.
green
In re: Level Propane Gases v. (2010)
S.E.C. v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Res., Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 665 (6th Cir. 2001).
green
In re: Erin Farms v. (2005)
This principle, also known as the ‘person aggrieved’ doctrine, limits standing to persons with a financial stake in the bankruptcy court’s order.” S.E.C. v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Res., Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 665 (6th Cir. 2001) (quoting Fidelity Bank, Nat’l Ass’n v. M.M.
quoting Fidelity Bank, Nat’l Ass’n v. M.M. Group, Inc., 77 F.3d 880, 882 (6th Cir. 1996)
green
Liberte Capital Group v. Capwill (2002)
SEC v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Resources, Inc., 273 F.3d at 668.
green
Omnipoint Holdings, Inc. v. City of Southfield (2002)
See Boeing Co. v. Van Gemert, 444 U.S. 472 , 488 n. 4, 100 S.Ct. 745 , 62 L.Ed.2d 676 (1980); S.E.C. v. Basic Energy and Affiliated Res., Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 665 (6th Cir.2001).
green
Liberte Capital Group, LLC v. Capwill (2006)
See SEC, Mosburg v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Resources, Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 668 (6th Cir.2001).
green
Liberte Capital Group, LLC v. Capwill (2006)
See SEC, Mosburg v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Resources, Inc., 273 F.3d 657, 668 (6th Cir.2001).
See SEC v. Basic Energy & Affiliated Res., Inc., 273 F.3d 657 , 666-67 (6th Cir. 2001); Forex Asset Mgmt., 242 F.3d at 330-31 .
green
Sheldon Gordon v. David Dadante (2009)
Development of Record The Regalbuto Plaintiffs’ first argument essentially is that they should have been allowed to conduct discovery with respect to the settlement agreement — or the district court itself should have developed a record before approving the settlement— and that, in the absence of such development, the district court lacked sufficient information to evaluate the fairness and adequacy of the settlement. “[A] district court has broad powers in fashioning relief…
green
Liberte Capital Group, Llc, Alpha Capital Group, LLC v. James A. Capwill, Janet E. Mohnkern, Intervenor-Appel… (2005)
See Basic Energy & Affiliated Resources, Inc., 273 F.3d at 668; SEC v. Wencke, 783 F.2d 829, 836-38 (9th Cir.1986) (holding that for the claims of nonparties to property claimed by receivers, summary proceedings satisfy due process so long as there is adequate notice and opportunity to be heard).
green
Liberte Capital v. Capwill (2005)
See Basic Energy & Affiliated Resources, Inc., 273 F.3d at 668; SEC v. Wenke, 783 F.2d 829, 836-38 (9th Cir. 1986) (holding that for the claims of nonparties to property claimed by receivers, summary proceedings satisfy due process so long as there is adequate notice and opportunity to be heard).