How cited: Libas Ltd. v. Carillo · Go Syfert

Libas Ltd. v. Carillo (2003)

green · 55 citation events across 6 courts. Showing the 40 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200320142026
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co. v. United States Forest Serv., 578 F.3d 1116, 1123 (9th Cir.2009) (finding remedies available under the Administrative Procedure Act indicative of congressional intent to displace Bivens ); Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.2003) (noting that a Bivens claim can be precluded when Congress either provides an alternative remedy or provides a mechanism for relief it considers adequate to remedy constitutional violations); Berry v. Hollander, 925 F.2d 311, 3
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co. v. United States Forest Sen., 578 F.3d 1116, 1123 (9th Cir.2009) (finding remedies available under the Administrative Procedure Act indicative of congressional intent to displace Bivens); Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.2003) (noting that a Bivens claim can be precluded when Congress either provides an alternative remedy or provides a mechanism for relief it considers adequate to remedy constitutional violations); Berry v. Hollander, 925 F.2d 311, 314
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
See Chilicky, 487 U.S. at 424-25 , 108 S.Ct. 2460 ; Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1129 (9th Cir.2003) (holding that no Bivens remedy was available where a statutory scheme allowed importers to challenge customs agents’ erroneous assessments of import duties but did not provide for consequential damages or a right of action against the individual agents); Janicki Logging Co. v. Mateer, 42 F.3d 561, 564-65 (9th Cir.1994) (holding that the Contract Dispute Act provided …
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
See Chilicky, 487 U.S. at 424-25 ; Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1129 (9th Cir. 2003) (holding that no Bivens remedy was available where a statutory scheme allowed importers to challenge customs agents’ erroneous assessments of import duties but did not provide for consequential dam- ages or a right of action against the individual agents); Janicki Logging Co. v. Mateer, 42 F.3d 561, 564-65 (9th Cir. 1994) (holding that the Contract Dispute Act provided an adequate a…
holding that no Bivens remedy was available where a statutory scheme allowed importers to challenge customs agents’ erroneous assessments of import duties but did not provide for consequential dam- ages or a right of action against the individual agents
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir. 2003).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
“We must determine whether, ‘assuming all facts and inferences in favor of the nonmoving party, it appears beyond doubt that [Andes] can prove no set of facts to support [its] claims.’” Id. (quoting Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir. 2003)).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir. 2003).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Marder v. Lopez, 450 F.3d 445, 448 (9th Cir.2006) (quoting Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir. 2003)).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Marder v. Lopez, 450 F.3d 445, 448 (9th Cir.2006) (quoting Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir. 2003)).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Therefore, we must ask whether, “as- suming all facts and inferences in favor of the nonmoving party, it appears beyond doubt that [Whitney and Rodney] can prove no set of facts to support [their] claims.” Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir. 2003).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Therefore, we must ask whether, “assuming all facts and inferences in favor of the nonmoving party, it appears beyond doubt that [Whitney and Rodney] can prove no set of facts to support [their] claims.” Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.2003).
green Marder v. Lopez (2006)
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
We must determine whether, “assuming all facts and inferences in favor of the nonmoving party, it appears beyond doubt that [Marder] can prove no set of facts to support [her] claims.” Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.2003).
green Marder v. Lopez (2006)
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
To our knowledge, no lawsuit was ever filed by Paramount against Sony or Lopez for using elements of Flashdance in the Video. 6532 MARDER v. LOPEZ port [her] claims.” Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir. 2003).
green Turner v. Means (2005)
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim, see Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.2003), and we affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court order filed on August 16, 2004 and entered into judgment on August 18, 2004.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
We therefore assume true the following facts, alleged in the First Amended Complaint. 2 See Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.2003).
green Jbassidji v. Goe (2005)
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
We therefore assume true the fol- lowing facts, alleged in the First Amended Complaint.2 See Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir. 2003).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Carson Harbor Vill., Ltd. v. City of Carson, 353 F.3d 824 , 826 (9th Cir.2004), cert. denied, —U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 105 , 160 L.Ed.2d 123 (2004); Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.2003).
green Kahawaiolaa v. Norton (2004)
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.2003).
green Kahawaiolaa v. Norton (2004)
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.2003).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.2003).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.2003).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.2003).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.2003).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Analysis We review de novo the district court’s determination that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the Kellys’ federal claims, Chang v. United States, 327 F.3d 911 , 922 (9th Cir.2003), and the dismissal for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.2003).
green Hinkson v. Hines (2004)
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Sews., 237 F.3d 1101 , 1106 (9th Cir.2001) (dismissal based on immunity); Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir. 2003) (dismissal of Bivens action for failure to state a claim).
dismissal of Bivens action for failure to state a claim
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
ANALYSIS 6 We review de novo the district court's determination that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the Kellys' federal claims, Chang v. United States, 327 F.3d 911 , 922 (9th Cir.2003), and the dismissal for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.2003).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
We review dismissal on this basis de novo, see Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.2003), and agree that the acts alleged do not state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 .
Rule Authority · D. Idaho
A court must determine whether, “‘assuming all facts and inferences in favor of the nonmoving party, it appears beyond doubt that [Marder] can prove no set of facts to support [her] claims.’” Marder v. Lopez, 450 F.3d 445, 448 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.2003)).
Rule Authority · E.D. Cal.
Radio Servs. 9 Co. v. U.S. Forest Serv., 578 F.3d 1116, 1123 (9th Cir. 2009) (noting that while the APA2 does 10 not provide for monetary damages or right to a jury trial, such remedial schemes may be adequate 11 if the absence of such features was not inadvertent on part of Congress); Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 12 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir. 2003) (noting Bivens claims are precluded where Congress 13 provided an alternative mechanism for relief that it considers adequate to r…
noting Bivens claims are precluded where Congress 13 provided an alternative mechanism for relief that it considers adequate to remedy constitutional 14 violations, and the failure to provide monetary damages or other relief was not inadvertent
Rule Authority · E.D. Cal.
Co. v. U.S. Forest Serv., 578 F.3d 1116, 1123 (9th Cir. 2009) (noting that while the 25 APA does not provide for monetary damages or right to a jury trial, such remedial schemes may 26 be adequate if the absence of such features was not inadvertent on part of Congress); Libas Ltd. v. 27 Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir. 2003) (noting Bivens claims are precluded where Congress 28 provided an alternative mechanism for relief that it considers adequate to remedy constituti…
noting Bivens claims are precluded where Congress 28 provided an alternative mechanism for relief that it considers adequate to remedy constitutional 1 violations, and the failure to provide monetary damages or other relief was not inadvertent
green Mendia v. Garcia (2016)
Rule Authority · N.D. Cal.
In particular, “the Court has emphasized that ’[s]o long as the plaintiff had an avenue for some redress, bedrock principles of separation of powers foreclosed judicial imposition of a new substantive liability.’ ” Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.2003) (alterations in the original) (quoting Malesko, 534 U.S. at 69 , 122 S.Ct. 515 ). “[T]he decision whether to recognize a Bivens remedy may require two steps.” Wilkie, 551 U.S. at 550 , 127 S.Ct. 2588 .
Rule Authority · C.D. Cal.
LEGAL STANDARD When reviewing a motion to dismiss, the Court “assum[es] all facts and inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.2003).
green Hart v. Gaioni (2005)
Rule Authority · C.D. Cal.
Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.2003) 7 .
Rule Authority · D. Haw.
Libas, Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.2003) (“Bivens s claims may be expressly precluded ‘when Congress has provided an alternative remedy [such as the RFPA] which it explicitly declares to be a substitute for recovery directly under the Constitution and views as equally effective.’ ”).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130-31 (9th Cir.2003) (affirming dismissal of Bivens action where an alternative remedy exists and “special factors” counsel against district court adjudication of a customs dispute); 19 U.S.C. § 1514 (providing a remedy for claims that goods were excluded from entry to the United States).
green Adams v. Johnson (2004)
Cited (see also) · 9th Cir. · signal: see also
See Kotarski v. Cooper, 866 F.2d 311, 312 (9th Cir.1989) (“Where Congress has designed a program that provides what it considers adequate remedial mechanisms for constitutional violations, Bivens actions should not be implied.”); see also Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.2003); Cederquist, 235 F.3d at 1156 .
green Johnson v. Lyle (2004)
Cited (see also) · 9th Cir. · signal: see also
See Kotarski v. Cooper, 866 F.2d 311, 312 (9th Cir.1989) ("Where Congress has designed a program that provides what it considers adequate remedial mechanisms for constitutional violations, Bivens actions should not be implied."); see also Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.2003); Cederquist, 235 F.3d at 1156 .
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.2003).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.2003).