State v. CSX Transp., Inc. (2022)
green
· 19 citation events
across 7 courts.
Showing the 5 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Reale v. Providence and Worcester Railroad Company (2024)
Co., 267 F.3d 439 , 441 n.2, 443-44 (5th Cir. 2001); State v. CSX Transportation, Inc., 168 Ohio St. 3d 543, 544, 548 (2023); State v. Norfolk S. Ry.
green
State ex rel. Yost v. Elevate Smoke, L.L.C. (2025)
See State v. CSX Transp., Inc., 2022-Ohio-2832, ¶ 11 , citing Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Albrecht, 387 U.S. 299 , 302 (2019).
Co., 635 F.3d 796, 807 (5th Cir. 2011) (holding Section 10501(b) expressly and completely preempted a state statute regulating trains blocking track crossings because the statute “is a direct attempt to manage [the rail carrier’s] decisions in the economic realm”); Green Mountain R.R. v. Vermont, 404 F.3d 638 , 643 (2d Cir. 2005) (holding Section 10501(b) expressly preempted a state environmental-land-use statute requiring a pre-construction permit for a transloading facilit…
holding Section 10501(b) expressly preempted a state statute regulating trains blocking track crossings because the statute regulates, manages, and governs rail traffic
Co., 635 F.3d 796, 807 (5th Cir. 2011) (holding Section 10501(b) expressly and completely preempted a state statute regulating trains blocking track crossings because the statute “is a direct attempt to manage [the rail carrier’s] decisions in the economic realm”); Green Mountain R.R. v. Vermont, 404 F.3d 638 , 643 (2d Cir. 2005) (holding Section 10501(b) expressly preempted a state environmental-land-use statute requiring a pre-construction permit for a transloading facilit…
holding Section 10501(b) expressly preempted a state statute regulating trains blocking track crossings because the statute regulates, manages, and governs rail traffic
Co., 635 F.3d 796, 807 (5th Cir. 2011) (holding Section 10501(b) expressly and completely preempted a state statute regulating trains blocking track crossings because the statute “is a direct attempt to manage [the rail carrier’s] decisions in the economic realm”); Green Mountain R.R. v. Vermont, 404 F.3d 638 , 643 (2d Cir. 2005) (holding Section 10501(b) expressly preempted a state environmental-land-use statute requiring a pre-construction permit for a transloading facilit…
holding Section 10501(b) expressly preempted a state statute regulating trains blocking track crossings because the statute regulates, manages, and governs rail traffic