United States v. Elizabeth Ann Lentsch Timothy Joseph Mellen (2004)

green · 6 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 3 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 3

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green United States v. Jeremy Edington (2013)

Rule Authority · 6th Cir.

Second, even if the “attempt” language in the superseding indictment is somewhat imprecise, this does not render the superseding indictment insufficient. “[D]ue process does not require a recitation of the statute; it requires only that the [indictment] as a whole set forth the critical details of the offense charged.” United States v. Lentsch, 369 F.3d 948, 953 (6th Cir.2004); see also United States v. Martinez, 981 F.2d 867, 872 (6th Cir.1992) (holding that an indictment t…

green Williams v. Haviland (2006)

Rule Authority · 6th Cir.

Id. at 951-52.

green United States v. Babubhai Rathod (2020)

Cited (see also) · 6th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., United States v. Lentsch, 369 F.3d 948, 952 (6th Cir. 2004) (noting that the requirement that a charging instrument contain the elements of the offense is “designed to ensure that defendants have sufficient notice of the charges against them to permit them to prepare a defense”). 8 19-1385/1453, United States v. Rathod Under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1, an enhancement for obstruction of justice is warranted if: (1) the defendant willfully obstructed or impeded, or attempted …

noting that the requirement that a charging instrument contain the elements of the offense is “designed to ensure that defendants have sufficient notice of the charges against them to permit them to prepare a defense”