Cluster 786631 (2004)
green
· 203 citation events
across 22 courts.
Showing the 50 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200420152026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Virginia Broadband, LLC v. Manuel (2015)
First, the creditor’s filing of a proof of claim constitutes “prima facie evidence of the amount and validity of the claim.” In re Harford Sands, Inc., 372 F.3d at 640; In re Hilton, No. 12-61102, 2013 WL 6229100 , at *5 (Bankr.
green
Summit Community Bank v. David (2021)
As a general matter, the Bankruptcy Code imposes a “burden shifting framework for proving the amount and validity of a claim.” Harford, 372 F.3d at 640.
green
In re Virginia Broadband, LLC (2014)
If the claimant files a prima facie valid claim, the burden shifts to the objecting party to “introduce evidence to rebut the claim’s presumptive validity.” Harford Sands, 372 F.3d at 640.
green
Byron F David (2022)
Once the creditor has filed the proof of claim, “[t]he burden then shifts to the debtor to object to the claim.” Harford, 372 F.3d at 640 (internal citations omitted).
internal citations omitted
green
In re Devey (2018)
In Harford Sands , 372 F.3d at 640 ("The creditor has the ultimate burden of proving the amount and validity of the claim by a preponderance of the evidence.").
"The creditor has the ultimate burden of proving the amount and validity of the claim by a preponderance of the evidence."
green
In re Haskins (2017)
If a claimant files a prima facie valid proof of claim, “[t]he burden ... shifts to the debtor to object to the claim” and to “introduce evidence to rebut the claim’s presumptive validity.” Harford Sands, 372 F.3d at 640 (internal citations omitted).
internal citations omitted
green
Schlossberg v. Abell (In re Abell) (2016)
In re Harford Sands Inc., 372 F.3d at 641 (presuming the validity of an insider’s proof of claim when it was filed); see also In re Inter-Island Vessel Co., Inc., 98 B.R. 606, 608 (Bankr.D.Mass.1988) (applying the presumption of validity to an insider’s proof of claim).
presuming the validity of an insider’s proof of claim when it was filed
green
Wilson v. U.S. Bank, National Association as Legal Trustee for Truman 2016 SC6 Title Trust (2022)
See In re Taneja, 743 F.3d at 429 ; In re Lee, 461 F. App’x at 231 ; In re Mosko, 515 F.3d at 324; In re Harford Sands, Inc., 372 F.3d at 639.
green
Swink v. Federal National Mortgage Association (2021)
If the debtor carries its burden, the creditor has the ultimate burden of proving the amount and validity of the claim by a preponderance of the evidence.” Harford Sands Inc., 372 F.3d at 640 (citations omitted).
citations omitted
green
Amadues Development LLC (2021)
For the reasons stated above, Liu was not authorized to borrow on behalf of the Debtor under the Operating Agreement, and there has been no showing of “the inherent fairness and good faith of the challenged transaction.” In re Harford Sands Inc., 372 F.3d at 641.
green
Phyllis Adele Johnson (2020)
“The burden then shifts to the debtor to object to the claim” and to “introduce evidence to rebut the claim’s presumptive validity.” Harford Sands, 372 F.3d at 640.
green
Jacob D. Jarvis (2020)
A creditor’s proof of claim “constitutes prima facie evidence of the amount and validity of the claim.” Stancill v. Harford Sands Inc, (In re Harford Sands Inc.), 372 F.3d 637, 640 (4th Cir. 2004) (citing 11 U.S.C. § 502 (a); FED.
citing 11 U.S.C. § 502 (a); FED. R. BANKR. P. 3001(f)
Stancill v. Harford Sands, Inc. (In re Harford Sands Inc.), 372 F.3d 637, 639 (4th Cir. 2004).
green
Pamela Ann Parris (2025)
Anderson, 477 U.S. at 252 (“[T]he inquiry involved in a ruling on a motion for summary judgment or for a directed verdict necessarily implicates the substantive evidentiary standard of proof that would apply at the trial on the merits.”); Stancill v. Harford Sands Inc. (In re Harford Sands Inc.), 372 F.3d 637, 641 (4th Cir. 2004) (finding that the validity and amount of a claim must be proven by a preponderance of the evidence).
finding that the validity and amount of a claim must be proven by a preponderance of the evidence
green
Hormozi v. U.S. Trustee (2025)
On an appeal from the bankruptcy court, the Court “review[s] the bankruptcy court’s legal conclusions de novo, factual findings for clear error, and any discretionary decisions for abuse of discretion.” Copley v. United States (In re Copley), 959 F.3d 118, 121 (4th Cir. 2020); Stancill v. Harford Sands Inc. (In re Harford Sands Inc.), 372 F.3d 637, 639 (4th Cir. 2004).
Stancill v. Harford Sands, Inc. (In re Harford Sands Inc.), 372 F.3d 637, 639 (4th Cir. 2004).
green
Cikeithia Berry (2023)
Stancill v. Harford Sands Inc. (In re Harford Sands Inc.), 372 F. 3d 637, 640 (4th Cir. 2004) (citing Canal Corp. v. Finnman (In re Johnson), 960 F.2d 396, 404 (4th Cir. 1992)).
citing Canal Corp. v. Finnman (In re Johnson), 960 F.2d 396, 404 (4th Cir. 1992)
green
Ferguson Enterprises, LLC v. Rose (2023)
Copley v. United States (In re Copley), 959 F.3d 118, 121 (4th Cir. 2020); Stancill v. Harford Sands Inc. (In re Harford Sands Inc.), 372 F.3d 637, 639 (4th Cir. 2004).
green
Imperial Frozen Foods Op Co, LLC (2023)
Stancill v. Harford Sands Inc. (In re Harford Sands Inc.), 372 F.3d 637, 640 (4th Cir. 2004) (internal citations omitted).
internal citations omitted
green
In re: Metal Recovery Solutions, Inc. (2023)
In re Desert Springs Fin., LLC, 2017 WL 1434403 , at *7 (citing Stancill v. Harford Sands Inc. (In re Harford Sands Inc.), 372 F.3d 637, 640-41 (4th Cir. 2004); McGee v. O'Connor (In re O'Connor), 153 F.3d 258, 260-61 (5th Cir. 1998)).
green
Olsen v. Janet M. Nesse, in her capacity as Chapter 7 Trustee for Creative Hairdressers, Inc. (2022)
Copley v. United States Un re Copley), 959 F.3d 118, 121 (4th Cir. 2020); Stancill v. Harford Sands Inc. (In re Harford Sands Inc.), 372 F.3d 637, 639 (4th Cir. 2004).
green
Kevin Lamar Gardner (2022)
P. 3001(f); In re Harford Sands Inc., 372 F.3d at 640.
green
Intelsat S.A. and Intelsat US LLC (2022)
If the debtor carries its burden, the creditor has the ultimate burden of proving the amount and validity of the claim by a preponderance of the evidence.” Stancill v. Harford Sands Inc. (In re Harford Sands Inc.), 372 F.3d 637, 640 (4th Cir. 2004) (internal citations omitted).
internal citations omitted
green
Intelsat S.A. and Intelsat US LLC (2022)
If the debtor carries its burden, the creditor has the ultimate burden of proving the amount and validity of the claim by a preponderance of the evidence.” Stancill v. Harford Sands Inc. (In re Harford Sands Inc.), 372 F.3d 637, 640 (4th Cir. 2004) (internal citations omitted).
internal citations omitted
Stancill v. Harford Sands, Inc. (In re Harford Sands, Inc.), 372 F.3d 637, 640 (4th Cir. 2004) (internal citations omitted).
internal citations omitted
green
Kevin Dean Twitty (2022)
Stancill v. Harford Sands Inc. (In re Harford Sands Inc.), 372 F.3d 637, 640 (4th Cir. 2004) (footnote and citations omitted).
footnote and citations omitted
The district court reviews the bankruptcy court’s legal conclusions de novo and its factual findings for clear error.7 Stancill v. Harford Sands, Inc. (In re Harford Sands Inc.), 372 F.3d 637, 639 (4th Cir. 2004).
green
Le Tote, Inc. (2021)
Stancill v. Harford Sands, Inc (In re Harford Sands Inc), 372 F.3d 637, 639 (4th Cir. 2004).
Stancill v. Harford Sands, Inc (In re Harford Sands Inc), 372 F.3d 637, 639 (4th Cir. 2004).
Stancill v. Harford Sands Inc. (In re Harford Sands Inc.), 372 F.3d 637, 639 (4th Cir. 2004).
green
Daryl Anthony Green (2020)
Stancill v. Harford Sands Inc. (In re Harford Sands Inc.), 372 F.3d 637, 640 (4th Cir. 2004) (internal citations omitted).
internal citations omitted
green
Green v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing (2020)
Stancill v. Harford Sands Inc. (In re Harford Sands Inc.), 372 F.3d 637, 640 (4th Cir. 2004) (internal citations omitted).
internal citations omitted
green
Green v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing (2020)
Stancill v. Harford Sands Inc. (In re Harford Sands Inc.), 372 F.3d 637, 640 (4th Cir. 2004) (internal citations omitted).
internal citations omitted
Stancill v. Harford Sands Inc. (In re Harford Sands Inc.), 372 F.3d 637, 640 (4th Cir. 2004) (internal citations omitted).
internal citations omitted
green
18601 Alderwood Mall Pkwy LLC v. Propco I Debtors (2020)
Stancill v. Harford Sands, Inc. (In re Harford Sands Inc. ), 372 F.3d 637, 639 (4th Cir. 2004).
green
Hutchinson v. First Community Bank (2020)
“The burden then shifts to the debtor to object to the claim,” and to “introduce evidence to rebut the claim’s presumptive validity.” Harford Sands, 372 F.3d at 640.
green
California Self-Insurers' Security Fund v. Siegel (2019)
Stancill v. Harford Sands, Inc. (In re Harford Sands Inc.), 372 F.3d 637, 639 (4th Cir. 2004).
green
In re Outer Banks Ventures, Inc. (2017)
P. 3001©; Stancill v. Harford Sands, Inc. (In re Harford Sands, Inc.), 372 F.3d 637, 640 (4th Cir. 2004); see also, e.g., In re Deep River Warehouse, Inc., 2005 WL 1513123 , at *2 (Bankr.
Stancill v. Harford, Sands Inc. (In re Harford Sands Inc.), 372 F.3d 637, 640 (4th Cir. 2004).
E.D.N.C. 2013) (quoting Stancill v. Harford Sands, Inc. (In re Harford Sands, Inc.), 372 F.3d 637, 640 (4th Cir. 2004) (citations omitted)).
citations omitted
E.D.N.C. 2013) (quoting Stancill v. Harford Sands Inc. (In re Harford Sands Inc.), 372 F.3d 637, 640 (4th Cir. 2004) (citations omitted)).
citations omitted
green
In re Fairmont General Hospital, Inc. (2017)
Stancill v. Harford Sands Inc. (In re Harford Sands Inc.), 372 F.3d 637, 640 (4th Cir. 2004).
green
In re REDF Marketing, LLC (2016)
Meaning, Roselli must “show the inherent fairness and good faith of the challenged transaction.)’ Harford Sands, 372 F.3d at 640 (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green
In re Gregg (2014)
Harford Sands, 372 F.3d at 641.
green
In re Nittany Enterprises, Inc. (2012)
Harford Sands, 372 F.3d at 640.
green
Suntrust Bank v. DEN-MARK CONSTRUCTION, INC. (2009)
See Stancill v. Harford Sands Inc., 372 F.3d 637 , 642 (4th Cir.2004) (“We do not re-weigh the credibility of witnesses on appeal.”) (citing Fed.
“due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the bankruptcy court to judge the credibility of the witnesses”
green
In Re Anderson (2006)
Because the excluded depositions were the only evidence Anderson offered to rebut the creditors’ prima facie case, and because Anderson adduced no other evidence to rebut the presumptively valid claims, the presumption properly carried the day for the claimant-appellee. 27 See In re Harford Sands Inc., 372 F.3d at 640 (“The debtor must introduce evidence to rebut the claim’s presumptive validity.”).
“The debtor must introduce evidence to rebut the claim’s presumptive validity.”
green
Schrandt (2006)
Stancill v. Harford Sands, Inc. (In re Harford Sands, Inc.), 372 F.3d 637, 640 (4th Cir.2004).
green
Doctors Health, Inc. v. Nylcare Health Plans of Mid-Atlantic, Inc. (In Re Doctors Health, Inc.) (2005)
As the Fourth Circuit stated in the recent case of Stancill v. Harford Sands, Inc. (In re Harford Sands, Inc.), 372 F.3d 637, 640-1 (4th Cir.2004): The Bankruptcy Code establishes a burden-shifting framework for proving the amount and validity of a claim.
green
David v. Summit Community Bank (2023)
See Harford, 372 F.3d at 640 (citing Fed.