Litchfield Asset Management Corp. v. Howell (2002)

green · 168 citation events across 7 courts. Showing the 23 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 23

Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

200220142026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green McKay v. Longman (2019)

Rule Authority · Conn. · 4 citations in this opinion

Id., 151.

green McKay v. Longman (2019)

Rule Authority · Conn. · 4 citations in this opinion

Id., 151.

green Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Westview Carlton Group, LLC (2008)

Rule Authority · Conn. App. Ct. · 2 citations in this opinion

The instrumentality test for piercing the corporate veil, which the court applied in the present case, “requires, in any case but an express agency, proof of three elements: (1) Control, not mere majority or complete stock control, but complete domination, not only of finances but of policy and business practice in respect to the transaction attacked so that the corporate entity as to this transaction had at the time no separate mind, will or existence of its own; (2) that s…

green Doe v. Norwich Roman Catholic Diocese (2006)

Rule Authority · Conn. Super. Ct.

Id., 139-40.

green American Diamond Exchange, Inc. v. Alpert (2007)

Cited · Conn. App. Ct. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion

See Litchfield Asset Management Corp. v. Howell, 70 Conn. App. 133, 139 , 799 A.2d 298 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 911 , 806 A.2d 49 (2002).

green O'Reilly v. Valletta (2012)

Cited · Conn. App. Ct. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Litchfield Asset Management Corp. v. Howell, 70 Conn. App. 133, 147 , 799 A.2d 298 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 911 , 806 A.2d 49 (2002).

green Sturm v. Harb Development, LLC (2010)

Cited (see also) · Conn. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion

See, e.g., Litchfield Asset Management Corp. v. Howell, 70 Conn. App. 133, 147-48 , 799 A.2d 298 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 911 , 806 A.2d 49 (2002).

green Wasko v. Farley (2008)

Cited · Conn. App. Ct. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Litchfield Asset Management Corp. v. Howell, 70 Conn. App. 133, 147 , 799 A.2d 298 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 911 , 806 A.2d 49 (2002).

green Titan Real Estate Ventures, LLC v. M.J.C.C. Realty L.P. (In re Flanagan) (2007)

Cited · Bankr. D. Conn. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Litchfield Asset Management Corp. v. Howell, 70 Conn.App. 133, 147 , 799 A.2d 298, 310 (Conn.App.2002), cert. denied, 261 Conn. 911 , 806 A.2d 49 (202). .

green In Re Flanagan (2007)

Cited · Bankr. D. Conn. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Litchfield Asset Management Corp. v. Howell, 70 Conn.App. 133, 147 , 799 A.2d 298, 310 (Conn.App.2002), cert. denied, 261 Conn. 911 , 806 A.2d 49 (202). [7] At least one surveyor/commentator has made a further distinction between so-called "insider reverse piercing" and "outsider reverse piercing".

green TZOVOLOS v. Wiseman (2007)

Cited · Conn. Super. Ct. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Litchfield Asset Management Corp. v. Howell, 70 Conn. App. 133, 147, 799 A.2d 298 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 911 , 806 A.2d 49 (2002).

green Titan Real Estate Ventures, LLC v. M.J.C.C. Realty L.P. (In re Flanagan) (2006)

Cited (see also) · Bankr. D. Conn. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion

See, e.g., Litchfield Asset Management Corp. v. Howell, 70 Conn.App. 133, 151 , 799 A.2d 298 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 911 , 806 A.2d 49 (2002).

green In Re Flanagan (2006)

Cited (see also) · Bankr. D. Conn. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion

See, e.g., Litchfield Asset Management Corp. v. Howell, 70 Conn. App. 133, 151 , 799 A.2d 298 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 911 , 806 A.2d 49 (2002).

green Parley v. Parley (2002)

Cited · Conn. App. Ct. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Litchfield Asset Management Corp. v. Howell, 70 Conn. App. 133, 143 , 799 A.2d 298 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 911 , 806 A.2d 49 (2002).

green Schreck v. City of Stamford (2002)

Cited · Conn. App. Ct. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Litchfield Asset Management Corp. v. Howell, 70 Conn. App. 133, 139 , 799 A.2d 298 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 911 , 806 A.2d 49 (2002).

green Com'r of Env. Prot. v. State Five Indus. (2012)

Cited · Conn. · signal: see

See id., at 135-36, 158 , 799 A.2d 298 .

green Konefal v. Konefal (2008)

Cited (see also) · Conn. App. Ct. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Legnos v. Legnos, 70 Conn. App. 349 , 350 n.1, 797 A.2d 1184 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 911 , 806 A.2d 48 (2002). “[W]e are not required to review issues that have been improperly presented to this court through an inadequate brief. . . .

green Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. Dunican (2007)

Cited · Conn. App. Ct. · signal: see

See Legnos v. Legnos, 70 Conn. App. 349 , 350 n.1, 797 A.2d 1184 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 911 , 806 A.2d 48 (2002); see also State v. Webb, 238 Conn. 389 , 468 n.56, 680 A.2d 147 (1996), aff'd after remand, 252 Conn. 128 , 750 A.2d 448 , cert. denied, 531 U.S. 835 , 121 S. Ct. 93 , 148 L.

green State v. Nunez (2006)

Cited · Conn. App. Ct. · signal: see

See Legnos v. Legnos, 70 Conn. App. 349, 355 , 797 A.2d 1184 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 911 , 806 A.2d 48 (2002). 2 Regarding the other Asherman factors, there was no likelihood of mistaken interpretation by the jury because the defendant offered evidence on the issue and argued an adverse inference against the state in his closing argument.

green Rocque v. DeMilo and Co., Inc. (2004)

Cited (see also) · Conn. App. Ct. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Legnos v. Legnos, 70 Conn. App. 349 , 350 n.1, 797 A.2d 1184 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 911 , 806 A.2d 48 (2002). 7 During the pendency of this appeal, the plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the same mootness grounds.

green Mattson v. Mattson (2002)

Cited · Conn. App. Ct. · signal: see

See Legnos v. Legnos, 70 Conn. App. 349, 355 , 797 A.2d 1184 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 911 , 806 A.2d 48 (2002).

green Rosina v. Bilides B. E., No. Cv 02-0462976 S (Dec. 3, 2002) (2002)

Cited · Conn. Super. Ct. · signal: see

See Litchfield Asset Management Corp. v. Howell, 70 Conn. App. 133 , 147 , 799 A.2d 298 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 911 , 802 A.2d 854 (2002); see also General Statutes § 34-133 .

green State v. Henry (2002)

Cited · Conn. App. Ct. · signal: see

See Legnos v. Legnos, 70 Conn. App. 349, 355 , 797 A.2d 1184 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 911 , 806 A. 2d 48 (2002).