Feng Ying Zheng v. Alberto Gonzales, 1 Attorney General of the United States (2005)

green · 30 citation events across 5 courts. Showing the 21 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 21

Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

200520152026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Moudjahed Ferchichi v. Pamela Bondi (2025)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

Moreover, petitioners “must demonstrate through credible, direct, and specific evidence that a reasonable person in [their] position would fear persecution.” Zheng v. Gonzales, 415 F.3d 955, 960 (8th Cir. 2005) (internal quotation omitted).

internal quotation omitted

green Jian Zhang v. Eric H. Holder, Jr. (2013)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

“A ‘refugee’ is an alien unwilling to return to her home country ‘because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.’ ” Zheng v. Gonzales, 415 F.3d 955, 959 (8th Cir.2005) (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(42)(A)).

green De Yun Liu v. Eric H. Holder, Jr. (2011)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

As noted earlier, State Department reports indicate that the enforcement of family planning policies in the Fujian Province is “lax” or “uneven.” Such reports are persuasive authority for determining whether an applicant has a well-founded fear of future persecution, Zheng *912 v. Gonzales, 415 F.3d 955, 960 (8th Cir.2005), and we find that Liu and her daughter have failed to demonstrate that the evidence they presented was “so compelling that no reasonable fact finder could…

green Zeng Lam Wang v. U.S. Attorney General (2007)

Rule Authority · 11th Cir.

See Guo v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 556, 565-66 (3d Cir. 2004); Zheng v. Gonzales, 415 F.3d 955, 961-63 (8th Cir.2005).

green Ardian Celaj Mirela Celaj Armela Celaj v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General (2006)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

Although we have remanded immigration cases for reconsideration where the IJ has neglected to analyze a significant piece of record evidence, see, e.g., Zheng v. Gonzales, 415 F.3d 955, 963 (8th Cir.2005), the statements cited by Celaj on appeal do not *1098 materially detract from the conclusions in the 2001 State Department report upon which the IJ relied.

green Ardian Celaj v. Alberto Gonzales (2006)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

Although we have remanded immigration cases for reconsideration where the IJ has neglected to analyze a significant piece of record evidence, see, e.g., Zheng v. Gonzalez, 415 F.3d 955, 963 (8th Cir. 2005), the statements cited by Celaj on appeal do not materially detract from the conclusions in the 2001 State Department report upon which the IJ relied.

green Bi Ying Lin v. Attorney General (2006)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

The Board did not discuss the evidence or give any reason why it had rejected it. ‘When an agency makes a finding of fact without mentioning or analyzing significant evidence, its decision should be reconsidered.” Zheng v. Gonzales, 415 F.3d 955, 963 (8th Cir.2005) (internal quotation marks omitted); accord Chen v. Gonzales, 417 F.3d 268, 272-73 (2d Cir.2005) (cited with approval in Cham v. Attorney Gen., 445 F.3d 683, 693 (3d Cir.2006)).

green Bao Hua Lin v. Alberto Gonzales, 1 (2006)

Rule Authority · 7th Cir.

See Yang v. Gonzales, 427 F.3d 1117, 1122 (8th Cir. 2005); Zheng v. Gonzales, 415 F.3d 955, 963 (8th Cir.2005); Guo v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 556, 565 (3d Cir.2004) (overturning denial of motion to reopen). *711 But Lin’s argument fails on other grounds.

green Lin, Bao H. v. Gonzales, Alberto R. (2006)

Rule Authority · 7th Cir.

See Yang v. Gonzales, 427 F.3d 1117, 1122 (8th Cir. 2005); Zheng v. Gonzales, 415 F.3d 955, 963 (8th Cir. 2005); Guo v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 556, 565 (3d Cir. 2004) (overturning denial of motion to reopen).

green Tu Kai Yang, Xue Lin Wu v. Alberto Gonzales, 1 Attorney General of the United States (2005)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

“A ‘refugee’ is an alien unwilling to return to her home country ‘because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of ... political opinion.’” Zheng v. Gonzales, 415 F.3d 955, 959 (C.A.8th Cir.2005) (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(42)(A)).

green Dento Shuaibu v. Alberto Gonzales, 1 Attorney General of the United States (2005)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

Zheng v. Gonzales, 415 F.3d 955, 959 (8th Cir.2005).

green Dento Shuaibu v. John Ashcroft (2005)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

Zheng v. Gonzales, 415 F.3d 955, 959 (8th Cir. 2005).

green Jose Rivera v. Merrick Garland (2024)