State v. Barnard (2013)

green · 23 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 9 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 9

Treatment trajectory · 2013 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

201320192026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Smith v. the State (2016)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

Rather, the Department is only authorized to revoke or suspend the nonresident’s privilege of driving in Georgia pursuant to OCGA § 40-5-51 (a). 4 See State v. Barnard, 321 Ga. App. 20, 23-24 (1) ( 740 SE2d 837 ) (2013) (The Department “has no authority to suspend or revoke the driver’s license of a nonresident motorist.”) (Footnote omitted.).

green Joshua I.C. Weintraub v. State (2019)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

“The trial court’s application of the law to the undisputed facts is subject to de novo review.” State v. Barnard, 321 Ga. App. 20, 20 ( 740 SE2d 837 ) (2013) (citation and punctuation omitted).

green HERNANDEZ v. the STATE. (2019)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

(Footnote omitted.) Barnard , 321 Ga. App. at 23 (1), 740 S.E.2d 837 .

green Wiggins v. State (2016)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

(Citation omitted.) State v. Barnard, 321 Ga. App. 20, 20 ( 740 SE2d 837 ) (2013).

green Rebecca Wiggins v. State (2016)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

The trial court’s application of the law to the undisputed facts is subject to de novo review.” (Citation omitted.) State v. Barnard, 321 Ga. App. 20, 20 ( 740 SE2d 837 ) (2013).

green The State v. Oyeniyi (2016)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

(Punctuation and footnote omitted.) State v. Barnard, 321 Ga. App. 20, 20 ( 740 SE2d 837 ) (2013).

green Wallace v. State (2013)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

State v. Barnard, 321 Ga. App. 20, 23 (1) ( 740 SE2d 837 ) (2013) (footnote omitted); State v. Chun, 265 Ga. App. 530, 531 ( 594 SE2d 732 ) (2004).

green William Glynn Wallace v. State (2013)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

Accordingly, we have suppressed the results of chemical tests where the driver was misinformed of his rights and where that misinformation may have affected his decision to consent.8 7 State v. Barnard, 321 Ga. App. 20, 23 (1) ( 740 SE2d 837 ) (2013) (footnote omitted); State v. Chun, 265 Ga. App. 530, 531 ( 594 SE2d 732 ) (2004). 8 Kitchens v. State, 258 Ga. App. 411 , ( 574 SE2d 451 ) (2002); see State v. Terry, 236 Ga. App. 248 ( 511 SE2d 608 ) (1999) (suppress of evidenc…

green Sauls v. State (2013)

Rule Authority · Ga.

At the time of Sauls’s arrest and now, OCGA § 40-5-67.1 (b) provides, in relevant part, that the implied consent notice “shall be read in its entirety but need not be read exactly so long as the substance of the notice remains unchanged.” Thus, in regard to the propriety of the suppression of the evidence in question, a determinative issue is also whether the implied consent notice that was actually given the driver was “substantively accurate so as to permit the driver to m…