United States Telephone Association v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, At&t Corporation, Intervenors (1999)
green
· 43 citation events
across 5 courts.
Showing the 20 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200020132026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
The regulatory response in some markets was adoption of a rate-based method commonly called “price caps,” United States Telephone Assn. v. FCC, 188 F. 3d 521, 524 (CADC 1999), as, for example, by the FCC’s setting of maximum access charges paid to large local-exchange com panies by interexchange carriers, In re Policy and Rules Concerning Rates for Dominant Carriers, 5 FCC Rcd. 6786, 6787, ¶ 1 (1990).
Cir. 2012), we must consider this argument even though it was raised only by industry intervenors, see U.S. Telephone Association v. FCC, 188 F.3d 521, 531 (D.C.
explaining the general “rule against consideration of issues raised by intervenors and not by petitioners”
green
Comcast Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission (2009)
Ass'n v. FCC, 188 F.3d 521, 531 (D.C.Cir.1999).
green
In Re Core Communications, Inc. (2008)
Ass'n v. FCC, 188 F.3d 521, 531 (D.C.Cir. 1999)).
Ass'n v. FCC, 188 F.3d 521, 531 (D.C.Cir.1999).
TOPUC I, 188 F.3d at 421 (analyzing § 254(b)(3)).
Ass’n v. FCC, 188 F.3d 521, 530-31 (D.C.Cir.1999).
green
Arapahoe Cty.Pub.Aut v. FAA (2001)
Ass'n v. FCC, 188 F.3d 521, 530-31 (D.C.
green
Marin Audubon Society v. FAA (2025)
Ass’n v. FCC, 188 F.3d 521, 531 (D.C.
explaining that the agency “may of course request a stay,” which was subsequently granted, see Order Granting Mot. to Stay Mandate, 188 F.3d 521 , No. 97-1469 (June 21, 1999)
green
Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, Environmental Integrity Project v. Environmental Protection A… (2007)
Ass'n v. FCC, 188 F.3d 521, 531 (D.C.Cir.1999); Columbia Falls Aluminum Co. v. EPA, 139 F.3d 914, 924 (D.C.Cir.1998); Envtl.
green
Natl Resrc Def Cncl v. EPA (2007)
Ass’n v. FCC, 188 F.3d 521, 531 (D.C.
Ass’n v. FCC, 188 F.3d 521, 531 (D.C.Cir.1999); Columbia Falls Aluminum Co. v. EPA, 139 F.3d 914, 924 (D.C.Cir.1998); Envtl.
Ass’n v. FCC, 188 F.3d 521, 531 (D.C.Cir.1999).
green
At&T Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission (2002)
Ass’n v. FCC, 188 F.3d 521, 523-24 (D.C.Cir.1999).
Ass'n v. FCC, 188 F.3d 521, 523-24 (D.C.Cir.1999). 5 .
Further, the Commission gives no explanation as to why any outlier should be removed, see United States Telephone Assn. v. FCC, 188 F.3d 521, 525 (D.C.Cir.1999) (agency eliminating outlying data points must explain “why the outliers were unreliable or their use inappropriate”), much less why a low outlier should be removed and a high one retained.
green
MO Pub Svc Cmsn v. FERC (2000)
Further, the Commission gives no explanation as to why any outlier should be removed, see United States Telephone Assn. v. FCC, 188 F.3d 521, 525 (D.C.
agency eliminating outlying data points must explain "why the outliers were unreliable or their use inappropriate"
green
Iowa Network Services, Inc. v. Qwest Corp. (2005)
Assoc. v. FCC, 188 F.3d 521, 523 (D.C.Cir.1999), which is not a local competition function to be governed by the reciprocal compensation rules.
See United States Telephone Association v. FCC, 188 F.3d 521, 531 (D.C.Cir.1999) (noting that intervenors not only failed to qualify for the Synovus exception but “presented] no reason why it could not have petitioned in its own right”).
green
TX Ofc Pub Util v. FCC (2001)
See USTA, 188 F.3d at 525 . 48 In its CALLS Order, the FCC reintroduced the same 6.5 percent X-Factor, but stated that the revamped X-Factor serves a different function as a "transitional mechanism that operates to reduce rates at a certain pace, and [is no longer] . . . linked to a specific measure of productivity." CALLS Order, ¶ 140.