Austin v. Austin (1946)
red
· 52 citation events
across 9 courts.
Showing the 3 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1947 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
194719862026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
red
Noland v. Yost (2023)
YOST Cite as 315 Neb. 568 And finally, we analyze whether the district court plainly erred in concluding that a natural parent has the absolute right to unilaterally terminate an established in loco parentis rela- tionship between a stepparent and his or her child. (a) In Loco Parentis Doctrine (i) Common-Law Principles [12,13] The common-law doctrine of in loco parentis has long been recognized in Nebraska, 27 and our cases gener- ally define the contours of the doctrine “i…
superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in In re Estate of McFayden, 235 Neb. 214 , 454 N.W.2d 676 (1990); applying common-law doctrine of in loco parentis to grandparents
green
Hickenbottom v. Hickenbottom (1991)
In Austin v. Austin, 147 Neb. 109, 112-13 , 22 N.W.2d 560, 563 (1946), we adopted the following: "A person standing in loco parentis to a child is one who has put himself in the situation of a lawful parent by assuming the obligations incident to the parental relation, without going through the formalities necessary to a legal adoption, and the rights, duties, and liabilities of such person are the same as those of the lawful parent.
green
Cooper v. Merkel (1991)
Home v. DSS, 227 Neb. 94 , 416 N.W.2d 551, 561 (1987) (quoting Austin v. Austin, 147 Neb. 109, 112-13 , 22 N.W.2d 560, 563 (1946)). 2 .