How cited: Abrams v. Social Security Administration · Go Syfert

Abrams v. Social Security Administration (2012)

green · 24 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 17 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 17
Treatment trajectory · 2014 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201420202026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green Higgins v. DVA (2020)
Rule Authority · Fed. Cir.
Admin., 703 F.3d 538, 542 (Fed.
green Robert Young v. Megan Brennan (2018)
Rule Authority · 7th Cir.
Admin., 703 F.3d 538, 542 (Fed.
green Robert Young v. Megan Brennan (2018)
Rule Authority · 7th Cir.
Admin., 703 F.3d 538, 542 (Fed.
green Robert Young v. Megan Brennan (2018)
Rule Authority · 7th Cir.
Admin., 703 F.3d 538, 542 (Fed.
green Canarios v. United States Postal Service (2017)
Rule Authority · Fed. Cir.
Admin., 703 F.3d 538, 542 (Fed.
internal quotation marks and citation omitted
green Fitzgerald v. Department of Homeland Security (2016)
Rule Authority · Fed. Cir.
Admin., 703 F.3d 538, 542 (Fed.
green Russell v. Department of Health & Human Services (2015)
Rule Authority · Fed. Cir.
Admin., 703 F.3d 538, 542 (Fed.Cir.2012) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
green Shapiro v. Social Security Administration (2015)
Rule Authority · Fed. Cir.
Admin., 703 F.3d 538, 542 (Fed.Cir.2012) (quoting Haebe v. Dep’t of Justice, 288 F.3d 1288, 1298 (Fed.Cir.2002)).
green Burks v. United States Postal Service (2014)
Rule Authority · Fed. Cir.
Admin., 703 F.3d 538, 542 (Fed.Cir.2012) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
green Berlin v. Department of Labor (2014)
Rule Authority · Fed. Cir.
Admin., 703 F.3d 538, 542 (Fed.Cir.2012) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
green Russell v. Department of Health (2014)
Rule Authority · Fed. Cir.
Admin., 703 F.3d 538, 542 (Fed.Cir.2012) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
green MANIS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (2024)
Rule Authority · M.D.N.C.
Admin., 703 F.3d 538, 543 (Fed.
deferring to agency’s reasonable construction of “good cause” under Chevron deference
green Michael Levinson v. Social Security Administration (2023)
Cited · MSPB · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Abrams, 703 F.3d at 540-43, 546 (affirming the Board’s finding of good cause to authorize the removal of an ALJ for his failure to follow multiple directives to process cases that had been lingering or justify his inability to do so); Social Security Administration v. Anyel, 58 M.S.P.R. 261 , 269 n.13 (1993) (finding that ALJs are required to follow agency policies) (citing Nash v. Bowen, 869 F.2d 675, 680 (2d Cir. 1989) (a Social Security Administration (SSA) “ALJ is a …
affirming the Board’s finding of good cause to authorize the removal of an ALJ for his failure to follow multiple directives to process cases that had been lingering or justify his inability to do so
green Michael Levinson v. Michael L. Levinson (2023)
Cited · MSPB · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Abrams, 703 F.3d at 540-43, 546 (affirming the Board’s finding of good cause to authorize the removal of an ALJ for his failure to follow multiple directives to process cases that had been lingering or justify his inability to do so); Social Security Administration v. Anyel, 58 M.S.P.R. 261 , 269 n.13 (1993) (finding that ALJs are required to follow agency policies) (citing Nash v. Bowen, 869 F.2d 675, 680 (2d Cir. 1989) (a Social Security Administration (SSA) “ALJ is a …
affirming the Board’s finding of good cause to authorize the removal of an ALJ for his failure to follow multiple directives to process cases that had been lingering or justify his inability to do so
green Social Security Administration v. Larry J. Butler (2016)
Cited (see also) · MSPB · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., Abrams v. Social Security Administration, 703 F.3d 538, 543 (Fed.
affirming the Board’s determination that failure to follow instructions is sufficient “good cause” for removal
green Larry Butler v. Social Security Administration (2024)
Cited · MSPB · signal: see
See Abrams v. Social Security Administration, 703 F.3d 538, 545 (Fed.
green Marlene Abrams v. Marlene R. Abrams (2022)
Cited (see also) · MSPB · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Abrams, 703 F.3d at 540-42 (noting that the three complaints, involving a 14-day suspension, a 30-day suspension, and a removal, were “combined”). ¶31 Finally, the record reflects that SSA filed a motion for a protective order to protect personal medical records of claimants, personnel information about other employees, and its internal deliberations that would be provided to the respondent during discovery, and the ALJ granted this request over the respondent’s o…
noting that the three complaints, involving a 14-day suspension, a 30-day suspension, and a removal, were “combined”