How cited: State v. Stone · Go Syfert

State v. Stone (2015)

green · 22 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 6 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2015 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201520202026
green State v. Heise-Fay (2015)
Rule Authority · Or. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
In both cases, the defendant had been placed in compelling circumstances because “the officers had communicated that they believed that each defendant had committed a crime, that they had probable cause to arrest, and that they intended to make an arrest or were strongly weighing the possibility of making an arrest.” Stone, 269 Or App at 753 (distilling analysis in Schwerbel and McMillan).
distilling analysis in Schwerbel and McMillan
green State v. Larson (2025)
Cited (see also) · Or. Ct. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
In undertaking that inquiry, we consider four factors: “(1) the location of the encounter, (2) the length of the encounter, (3) the amount of pressure exerted on the defendant, and (4) the defendant’s ability to terminate the encounter.” Id. (internal citations omitted); see also State v. Stone, 269 Or App 745, 750 , 346 P3d 595 (2015) (same).
same
green State v. Larson (2025)
Cited (see also) · Or. Ct. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
In undertaking that inquiry, we consider four factors: “(1) the location of the encounter, (2) the length of the encounter, (3) the amount of pressure exerted on the defendant, and (4) the defendant’s ability to terminate the encounter.” Id. (internal citations omitted); see also State v. Stone, 269 Or App 745, 750 , 346 P3d 595 (2015) (same).
same
green State v. Nolen (2024)
Cited (see also) · Or. Ct. App. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., State v. Stone, 269 Or App 745, 753 , 346 P3d 595 (2015) (citing cases where the defendant had been placed in compel- ling circumstances because “the officers had communicated that they believed each defendant had committed a crime, that they had probable cause to arrest, and that they intended to make an arrest or were strongly weighing the possibility of making an arrest”); Heise-Fay, 274 Or App at 207 (offi- cer’s statement to the defendant that he had no inten…
green State v. Phillips (2020)
Cited (see also) · Or. Ct. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See Heise-Fay, 274 Or App at 205-06 (discussing cases); see also State v. Stone, 269 Or App 745, 752-53 , 346 P3d 595 (2015) (similar).
similar
green State v. Love-Faust (2021)
Cited · Or. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Stone, 269 Or App at 752-53 (summarizing cases and explaining that compelling cir- cumstances have been created where officers communi- cated “that they believed each defendant had committed a crime, that they had probable cause to arrest, and that they intended to make an arrest or were strongly weighing the possibility of making an arrest”); Heise-Fay, 274 Or App at 206 (summarizing cases where compelling circumstances did not exist “when an officer had asked open-ende…