How cited: Metrik v. Fort Tryon Gardens, Inc. · Go Syfert

Metrik v. Fort Tryon Gardens, Inc. (1945)

green · 78 citation events across 40 courts. Showing the 13 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 13
Treatment trajectory · 1947 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
194719862026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green Martti v. United States (2015)
Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.
S.Ct. 1562, 89 L.Ed. 2006 (1945).
green Hartenstein v. Hartenstein (1963)
Rule Authority · Wis.
R. 1366, rehearing denied, 325 U. S. 895 , 65 Sup. Ct. 1560, 89 L.
green Joyce E. Murphree, as Widow and for the Use and Benefit of the Next of Kin of Woodrow Wilson Murphree, Deceas… (1982)
Cited · 6th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Chase Securities Corp. v. Donaldson, 325 U.S. 304 , 65 S.Ct. 1137 , 89 L.Ed. 1628 , reh. denied, 325 U.S. 896 , 65 S.Ct. 1561 , 89 L.Ed. 2006 (1945) (statutory amendment abolishing limitations defense did not deprive defendant of any right); Campbell v. Holt, 115 U.S. 620 , 6 S.Ct. 209 , 29 L.Ed. 483 (1885) (statutes of limitations go to matters of remedy rather than destruction of fundamental rights).
statutory amendment abolishing limitations defense did not deprive defendant of any right
green Giles H. Miller, Jr., of the Estate of Virginia Fletcher Wood v. United States (1991)
Cited · 4th Cir. · signal: see
See Angelus Milling Co. v. Commissioner, 325 U.S. 293, 297 , 65 S.Ct. 1162, 1164 , 89 L.Ed. 1619 , reh’g denied, 325 U.S. 895 , 65 S.Ct. 1562 , 89 L.Ed. 2006 (1945).
green Bankr. L. Rep. P 69,507, 14 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1205 John Ed Clay and Wife, Marie Clay v. Johns-Manville Sale… (1984)
Cited · 6th Cir. · signal: see
See Chase Securities Corp. v. Donaldson, 325 U.S. 304 , 65 S.Ct. 1137 , 89 L.Ed. 1628 , reh. denied, 325 U.S. 896 , 65 S.Ct. 1561 , 89 L.Ed. 2006 (1945) (statutory amendment abolishing limitations defense did not deprive defendant of any right); Campbell v. Holt, 115 U.S. 620 , 6 S.Ct. 209 , 29 L.Ed. 483 (1885) (statutes of limitations go to matters of remedy rather than destruction of fundamental rights).
statutory amendment abolishing limitations defense did not deprive defendant of any right
green Clay v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1983)
Cited · 6th Cir. · signal: see
See Chase Securities Corp. v. Donaldson, 325 U.S. 304 , 65 S.Ct. 1137 , 89 L.Ed. 1628 , reh. denied, 325 U.S. 896 , 65 S.Ct. 1561 , 89 L.Ed. 2006 (1945) (statutory amendment abolishing limitations defense did not deprive defendant of any right); Campbell v. Holt, 115 U.S. 620 , 6 S.Ct. 209 , 29 L.Ed. 483 (1885) (statutes of limitations go to matters of remedy rather than destruction of fundamental rights).
statutory amendment abolishing limitations defense did not deprive defendant of any right
green Doe v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Jefferson City (1993)
Cited (see also) · Mo. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See also Chase Securities Corp. v. Donaldson, 325 U.S. 304 , 65 S.Ct. 1137 , 89 L.Ed. 1628 , reh’g denied 325 U.S. 896 , 65 S.Ct. 1561 , 89 L.Ed. 2006 (1945).
green Presbytery of Southeast Iowa v. Harris (1975)
Cited · Iowa · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Chase Securities Corporation v. Donaldson, 325 U.S. 304, 314 , 65 S.Ct. 1137, 1142 , 89 L.Ed. 1628 (1945), reh. den. 325 U.S. 896 , 65 S.Ct. 1561 , 89 L.Ed. 2006 ; Home Building & Loan Ass’n. v. Blaisdell, 290 U.S. 398, 429-430 , 54 S.Ct. 231, 236-237 , 78 L.Ed. 413 (1934); 2 Sutherland, Statutory Construction, § 41.09 (4th ed. 1973); 51 Am.Jur.2d, Limitation of Actions, §§ 21-22.
green Computervision Corp. v. United States (2004)
Cited · Fed. Cl. · signal: see
See Angelus Milling Co. v. Commissioner, 325 U.S. 293, 297 , 65 S.Ct. 1162 , 89 L.Ed. 1619 (1945), reh’g denied, 325 U.S. 895 , 65 S.Ct. 1562 , 89 L.Ed. 2006 (1945).
green Hassan v. Hassan, No. Fa01-0632261 (Sep. 30, 2001) (2001)
Cited · Conn. Super. Ct. · signal: see
See Williams v. North Carolina, [ 325 U.S. 226 , 298 , 65 S.Ct. 1092 , 89 L.Ed. 1577 , reh. denied, 325 U.S. 895 , 65 S.Ct. 1560 , 89 L.Ed. 2006 (1945)]; 4 Am.Jur.2d, Annulment of Marriage, 2. if judicial action is needed, it must be because, in some degree at least, a status of marriage exists.
green Myers v. Hayes International Corp. (1988)
Cited · M.D. Tenn. · signal: see
See Chase Securities Corp. v. Donaldson, 325 U.S. 304 , 65 S.Ct. 1137 , 89 L.Ed. 1628 reh. denied, 325 U.S. 896 , 65 S.Ct. 1561 , 89 L.Ed. 2006 (1945) (statutory amendment abolishing limitations defense did not deprive defendant of any right); Campbell v. Holt, 115 U.S. 620 , 6 S.Ct. 209 , 29 L.Ed. 483 (1885) (statutes of limitations go to matters of remedy rather than destruction of fundamental rights).
statutory amendment abolishing limitations defense did not deprive defendant of any right
green Northern Oil Co. v. Standard Oil Co. (1985)
Cited (see also) · Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. · signal: compare
Compare Chase Securities Corp. v. Donaldson, 325 U.S. 304, 314-16 , 65 S.Ct. 1137, 1142-43 , 89 L.Ed. 1628 (reflecting willingness to permit impact of statutes of limitation to be restricted), reh'g denied, 325 U.S. 896 , 65 S.Ct. 1561 , 89 L.Ed. 2006 (1945) with Locafrance U.S. Corp. v. Intermodal Systems Leasing, Inc., 558 F.2d at 1115 (encouraging enforcement of releases made in commercial context where language of release is clear), and Ruskay v. Waddell, 552 F.2d 392, 3…
green Gill v. Gill (1976)
Cited (see also) · E.D. Pa. · signal: see also
See also Williams v. North Carolina, 325 U.S. 226, 233 , 65 S.Ct. 1092, 1096-97 , 89 L.Ed. 1577, 1583 , reh. denied, 325 U.S. 895 , 65 S.Ct. 1560 , 89 L.Ed. 2006 (1945); Simms v. Simms, 175 U.S. 162, 167 , 20 S.Ct. 58, 60 , 44 L.Ed. 115, 117 (1899). 9 .