Owens v. Owens (2022)

Therefore, Cee concludes that there is competent, credible evidence supporting the trial court’s decision to use December 2016 as the beginning of “during the marriage” date. {¶27} We agree with Cee and find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that December 2016 was the beginning date of “during the marriage.” {¶28} “ ‘Prior to dividing a couples’ property and debts, the trial court must determine the duration of the marriage by pinpointing the time …

In doing so, he fails to point to any legal authority in support of his position. {¶33} Wife argues that the valuation was proper where the trial court determined that the vehicles should be valued by their present value as of the date of the hearing, and her property statement was submitted nearly a year and a half prior to the trial. {¶34} “Prior to dividing a couples’ property and debts, the trial court must determine the duration of the marriage by pinpointing the time p…