How cited: Bowser v. Commissioner of Social Security · Go Syfert

Bowser v. Commissioner of Social Security (2005)

green · 5 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 4 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · E.D. Cal.
Sec., 121 F. App’x 231, 242 (9th Cir. 2005) (“[T]he objective medical findings contained in such opinions are to be evaluated as any other medical opinion [and] [t]he ALJ’s opinion should reflect, 19 however, that the ALJ properly considered the pertinent distinctions between the two schemes . . .
Rule Authority · C.D. Cal.
Sec., 121 F. App’x 231, 244 (9th Cir. 2005) (citing 10 Soc.
citing 10 Soc. Sec. Reg. 96-8p, 1996 WL 374184 (July 2, 1996)
Quote Authority · E.D. Cal.
Sec., 121 F. App’x 231, 241-44 (9th Cir. 10 2005) (“[T]he ALJ may not ignore a doctor’s medical opinion merely because it was issued in a 11 workers’ compensation context[; i]nstead, the objective medical findings contained in such 12 opinions are to be evaluated as any other medical opinion.”); Carter v. Chater, 99 F.3d 1145 , n.1 13 (9th Cir. 1996) (unpublished) (“[T]he ALJ erred by considering the fact that most of Carter’s 14 medical records were generated for her Worker…
“[T]he ALJ may not ignore a doctor’s medical opinion merely because it was issued in a 11 workers’ compensation context[; i]nstead, the objective medical findings contained in such 12 opinions are to be evaluated as any other medical opinion.”
green Garcia v. Colvin (2014)
Rule Authority · E.D. Wash.
Sec., 121 Fed.Appx. 231, 232 (9th Cir.2005) (“Step three ... directs the adjudicator to determine whether, in light of the objective medical evidence, the claimant has a severe impairment or combination of impairments that meets or equals the criteria in the Listing of Impairments^]”).