How cited: In re Raygoza · Go Syfert

In re Raygoza (2016)

green · 14 citation events across 6 courts. Showing the 11 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · Bankr. S.D. Tex.
See HL Builders, 630 B.R. at 58 (finding no reason to depart from the lodestar method for a case “not out of the ordinary for defending an involuntary petition”); In re Raygoza, 556 B.R. 813, 825 (Bankr.
finding no evidence of undesirability in preparing or filing a proof of claim
green In re Garza (2017)
Rule Authority · Bankr. S.D. Tex.
Tex. 2016) (citing In re Raygoza, 556 B.R. 813, 821 (Bankr.
green In re Sierra (2016)
Rule Authority · Bankr. S.D. Tex.
In re Raygoza, 556 B.R. 813, 821 (Bankr.
citing Yates v. United States, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 1074, 1081-81 , 191 L.Ed.2d 64 (2015)
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., In re Raygoza, 556 B.R. 813, 824 (Bankr.
Cited (see also) · S.D. Tex. · signal: see also
In re Hudson Shipbuilders, Inc., 794 F.2d 1051 , 1058 (5th Cir. 1986), overruled in part by Stern v. Marshall, 564 U.S. 462 (2011); see also Raygoza, 556 B.R. at 823 .
Cited (see also) · S.D. Tex. · signal: see also
In re Hudson Shipbuilders, Inc., 794 F.2d 1051 , 1058 (5th Cir. 1986), overruled in part by Stern v. Marshall, 564 U.S. 462 (2011); see also Raygoza, 556 B.R. at 823 .
Cited · Bankr. W.D. Mo. · signal: see
See In re Raygoza, 556 B.R. 813 , 819–20 (Bankr.
determining a party “incurs” an expense when a professional preforms the relevant legal services
green Yulanda D Gunn (2019)
Cited · Bankr. N.D. Miss. · signal: see
See In re Raygoza, 556 B.R. 813, 821-25 (Bankr.
discussing split in authority over awarding of attorney’s fees for proof of claim preparation
green In re Mandeville (2019)
Cited (see also) · Bankr. N.D. Ala. · signal: see also
See also In re Raygoza , 556 B.R. 813 , 823-824 (Bankr.
green In re Okafor (2018)
Cited · Bankr. W.D. Mo. · signal: see
See In re Raygoza , 556 B.R. 813 , 823 (Bankr.
citing In re Madison , 337 B.R. 99 , 105 (Bankr. N.D. Miss. 2006)
green In re McPhilamy (2017)
Cited (see also) · Bankr. S.D. Tex. · signal: see also
Texas law defines “purchase-money obligation” as “an obligation ... incurred as all or part of the price of the collateral or for value given to enable the debtor to acquire rights in or the use of the collateral if the value is in fact so used.” Id.; see also In re Raygoza, 556 B.R. 813, 821 (Bankr.
holding that a debt is “incurred [when] there is a legal obligation to pay”