Glendle Cain, III v. Owensboro Public Schools (2013)

Schs., 711 F.3d 623, 635 (6th Cir. 2013) (holding that § 504 requires proof that the “plaintiff is being excluded from participation in, or being denied the benefits of, or being subjected to discrimination under the program solely by reason of his handicap”) (citation omitted); K.M. ex rel.

holding that § 504 requires proof that the “plaintiff is being excluded from participation in, or being denied the benefits of, or being subjected to discrimination under the program solely by reason of his handicap”

green Babinski v. Sosnowsky (2023)

Quote Authority · 5th Cir.

Sch., 711 F.3d 623, 631 (6th Cir. 2013) (“[T]he concept of de facto expulsions is not new to this court.”) (citing cases). 9 Case: 22-30588 Document: 00516865070 Page: 10 Date Filed: 08/21/2023 No. 22-30588 this standard, the Supreme Court in Goss determined that a school’s suspension of multiple disruptive students without notice and a hearing was a violation of the students’ due process rights.

“[T]he concept of de facto expulsions is not new to this court.”

green Keshia Clemons v. Shelby Cty. Bd. of Educ. (2020)

Rule Authority · 6th Cir.

Sch., 711 F.3d 623, 635 (6th Cir. 2013)). 10 We note that the Complaint does not specify whether the individual Defendants are sued in their individual or official capacities.

green Naqis Crochran v. Columbus City Schools (2018)

Rule Authority · 6th Cir.

Sch., 711 F.3d 623, 635 (6th Cir. 2013) (quoting Campbell v. Bd. of Educ., 58 F. App’x 162, 167 (6th Cir. 2003)).

quoting Campbell v. Bd. of Educ., 58 F. App’x 162, 167 (6th Cir. 2003)

green I.Z.M. v. Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schools (2017)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

Schs., 711 F.3d 623, 635 (6th Cir. 2013); D.A. ex rel.

green G.E. v. Williamson County Board of Education (2023)

Rule Authority · M.D. Tenn. · 2 citations in this opinion

Schs., 711 F.3d 623, 635 (6th Cir. 2013) (quoting Campbell v. Bd. of Educ. of Centerline Sch.

quoting Campbell v. Bd. of Educ. of Centerline Sch. Dist., 58 F. App’x 162, 165 (6th Cir. 2003)

green N.P. v. Kenton County Public Schools (2023)

Rule Authority · E.D. Ky. · 2 citations in this opinion

Schs., 711 F.3d 623, 635 (6th Cir. 2013)).

green Lepp v. Mallett (2025)

Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.

Sch., 711 F.3d 623, 635 (6th Cir. 2013)).

green Clayton v. Kroopnick (2024)

Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.

Schs., 711 F.3d 623, 635 (6th Cir. 2013)).

green Colbert v. Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners (2024)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ohio

Sch., 711 F.3d 623, 625 (6" Cir. Ky. 2013)).

green Johnson v. Mount Pleasant Public Schools (2024)

Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.

Sch., 711 F.3d 623, 635 (6th Cir. 2013); Campbell v. Bd. of Educ. of Centerline Sch.

green Warman v. Mount St. Joseph University (2024)

Rule Authority · S.D. Ohio

Schs., 711 F.3d 623, 635 (6th Cir. 2013) (quoting Campbell v. Bd. of Educ. of Centerline Sch.

quoting Campbell v. Bd. of Educ. of Centerline Sch. Dist., 58 F. App’x 162, 165 (6th Cir. 2003)

green Torres v. Stewart County School System (2023)

Rule Authority · M.D. Tenn.

Schs., 711 F.3d 623, 635 (6th Cir. 2013) (stating that “at least in the context of education of handicapped children” establishing a Section 504 violation requires a showing of “bad faith or gross misjudgment”)).

stating that “at least in the context of education of handicapped children” establishing a Section 504 violation requires a showing of “bad faith or gross misjudgment”

green Williamson v. University of Louisville (2023)

Rule Authority · W.D. Ky.

Sch., 711 F.3d 623, 635 (6th Cir. 2013)).

green Rudman v. Oklahoma State of (2023)

Rule Authority · W.D. Okla.

Sch., 711 F.3d 623, 631 (6th Cir. 2013).

green Depew v. Stolarsky (2023)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ohio

Schs., 711 F.3d 623, 635 (6th Cir. 2013)).

green Stanford v. Northmont City Schools (2023)

Rule Authority · S.D. Ohio

Schs., 711 F.3d 623, 632 (6th Cir. 2013).

green Blassingame v. Trihealth Inc. (2022)

Rule Authority · S.D. Ohio

Sch., 711 F.3d 623, 635 (6th Cir. 2013).

green Peeples v. Wayne State University (2022)

Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.

Sch., 711 F.3d 623, 635 (6th Cir. 2013)) (emphasis added in Gohl).

green Blassingame v. Trihealth Inc. (2022)

Rule Authority · S.D. Ohio

Schs., 711 F.3d 623, 635 (6th Cir. 2013).

green Ndiaye v. United States of America (2021)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ohio

Sch., 711 F.3d 623, 635 (6th Cir. 2013).

green Browning v. Edmonson County, Kentucky (2020)

Rule Authority · W.D. Ky.

Sch., 711 F.3d 623, 634 (6th Cir. 2013) (favorably citing Slicker v. Jackson, 215 F.3d 1225 , 1231-32 (11th Cir. 2000)); Prado v. Thomas, 2019 WL 1283823 , at *11 n.10 (S.D.

favorably citing Slicker v. Jackson, 215 F.3d 1225 , 1231-32 (11th Cir. 2000)

green Sophie G. ex rel. Kelly G. v. Wilson County Schools (2017)

Rule Authority · M.D. Tenn.

Sch., 711 F.3d 623, 634 (6th Cir. 2013)(quoting Campbell v. Bd. of Educ. of Centerline Sch.

quoting Campbell v. Bd. of Educ. of Centerline Sch. Dist., 58 Fed.Appx. 162, 165 (6th Cir. 2003)

green M.P.T.C. ex rel. C.C. v. Nelson County School District (2016)

Rule Authority · W.D. Ky.

“The lack of any constitutional deprivation precludes a finding of municipal liability against the Board.” Id E.Rehabilitation Act Claim With respect to Plaintiffs § 504 Rehabilitation Act Claim against the Nelson County Board of Education, the Plaintiff must show that “(1) The plaintiff is a ‘handicapped person’ under the Act; (2) The plaintiff is ‘otherwise qualified’ for participation in the program; (3) The plaintiff is being excluded from participation in, or being deni…

green Gohl ex rel. J.G. v. Livonia Public Schools (2015)

Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.

Schs., 711 F.3d 623, 635 (6th Cir.2013).

green Zdrowski v. Rieck (2015)

Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.

Sch, 711 F.3d 623, 635 (6th Cir.2013).

green Jahn v. Farnsworth (2014)

Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.

Schs., 711 F.3d 623, 631 (6th Cir.2013) (citing cases for proposition).

green Doe ex rel. Smith v. Sobeck (2013)

Rule Authority · S.D. Ill.

Sch., 711 F.3d 623, 635 (6th Cir.2013); Stewart v. Waco Indep.

green Richard D. Jackson v. David M. McCurry (2019)

Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see

See G.C., 711 F.3d at 633–34 (search of a student’s cellphone based on “general background knowledge” that he abused drugs and was depressed and because he used the cellphone in class in violation of school policy was unjustified at its inception); Gallimore, 38 F. Supp. 3d at 725 (expansion of a search to a student’s cellphone was not “reasonably related” to the objective of “finding evidence of drug use on the school bus earlier that day” because “the cell phone could not …