How cited: Johnson v. Dollar General · Go Syfert

Johnson v. Dollar General (2012)

green · 16 citation events across 11 courts. Showing the 11 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · 1st Cir.
Bd. of Educ., 379 F.3d 1249, 1253 (11th Cir.2004) (holding that eligibility is a prerequisite for a retaliation claim), with Johnson v. Dollar Gen., 880 F.Supp.2d 967, 991 (N.D.Iowa 2012) (criticizing Walker); see also Wilkins v. Packerware Corp., 260 Fed.Appx. 98, 102-103 (10th Cir.2008) (surveying cases and describing the issue as “contestable”).
criticizing Walker
Rule Authority · M.D.N.C.
Bd. of Educ., 379 F.3d 1249, 1253 (11th Cir. 2004) (holding that eligibility is a prerequisite for a retaliation claim), with Johnson v. Dollar Gen., 880 F. Supp. 2d 967, 991 (N.D.
criticizing Walker
Rule Authority · N.D. Iowa
Taking FMLA leave, or attempting to do so when eligible, is “protected conduct.” Johnson v. Dollar Gen., 880 F. Supp. 2d 967, 993 (N.D.
Rule Authority · E.D. Ark.
Johnson v. Dollar General, 880 F. Supp. 2d 967, 995 (N.D.
Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.
Her FMLA request cannot be said to have played any role in Logan’s decision-making process, and the record does not show any 1 Plaintiff is correct that I expressed admiration for Judge Mark Bennett’s decision in Johnson v. Dollar General, 880 F.Supp.2d 967, 994 (N.D.
Rule Authority · M.D. Penn.
Brann United States District Judge 73 See Johnson v. Dollar General, 880 F. Supp. 2d 967, 986 (N.D.
granting summary judgment on failure-to-advise claim where employee had received employee handbook, received training, and seen posters addressing company’s FMLA policies
Rule Authority · D. Mass.
Bd. of Educ., 379 F.3d 1249, 1253 (11th Cir. 2004) (holding that eligibility is a prerequisite for a retaliation claim), with Johnson v. Dollar Gen., 880 F. Supp. 2d 967, 991 (N.D.
criticizing Walker
Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.
In Johnson v. Dollar General, Judge Mark Bennett issued a thorough gnd well-reasoned opinion holding that an FMLA-" ‘retaliation’ claim does not require proof that the plaintiff actually suffered a ‘serious health condition,' only that the plaintiff gave adequate and timely notice to the employer that he or -she needed leave for a condition that the plaintiff believed, in good faith, might be covered by the FMLA." 880 F.Supp.2d 967, 994 (N.D.
Cited (see also) · 3rd Cir. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., Johnson v. Dollar Gen., 880 F.Supp.2d 967, 987 (N.D.Iowa 2012) (“Neither a trip to the emergency room nor an in-person visit with the on-call doctor — both of which Johnson's doctor's medical assistant urged when Johnson called his doctor’s office on May 1, 2009 — would have constituted ‘inpatient care,’ and Johnson refused either kind of treatment.”), aff'd, 508 Fed.Appx. 587 (8th Cir.2013) (per curiam); Anderson v. Nissan N. Am., Inc., Civil Action No. 3:09-cv-5…
Cited · D.D.C. · signal: see
See Johnson v. Dollar General, 880 F. Supp. 2d 967 , 990–94 (N.D.
Cited (see also) · N.D. Iowa · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Johnson v. Dollar Gen., 880 F.Supp.2d 967, 997 (N.D.Iowa 2012), affd, 508 Fed.Appx. 587 (8th Cir.2013); Campbell v. Iowa Third Judicial Dish Dep’t of Corr., No. C09-4087-MWB, 2011 WL 5866244 , at *1 (N.D.Iowa Nov. 22, 2011); Truckenmiller v. Burgess Health Ctr., 814 F.Supp.2d 894, 912 (N.D.Iowa 2011); Hussaini v. Gelita USA Inc., 749 F.Supp.2d 909, 919 (N.D.Iowa 2010); Dollar v. Smithway Motor Xpress, Inc., No. C093043-MWB, 2010 WL 3723900 , at *4 (N.D.Iowa Sept. …