Hohu v. Hatch (2013)
green
· 4 citation events
across 3 courts.
Showing the 3 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Pawl Washeleski v. Golnesa Monazamfar, et al. (2025)
Washeleski has not submitted any evidence that he complied with Rule 11’s safe 10 harbor provision, which “precludes an award of Rule 11 sanctions.” Winterrowd, 556 F.3d at 826 ; 11 see also Hohu v. Hatch, 940 F. Supp. 2d 1161, 1176-78 (N.D.
green
Gatlin v. Johnson (2025)
The party seeking to assert collateral estoppel has the burden of 14 proof and “must introduce a record sufficient to reveal the controlling facts and pinpoint 15 the exact issues litigated in the prior action.” Baldwin v. Kilpatrick (In re Baldwin), 245 16 B.R. 131 , 134 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2000). “‘The party asserting collateral estoppel must . . . 17 show that the estopped issue is identical to an issue litigated in a previous action.’” 18 Hohu v. Hatch, 940 F. Supp. 2d 1161…
green
Burns v. Thuney (2023)
See Hohu v. Hatch, 940 F. Supp. 2d 1161, 1170-73 (N.D.
discussing cases, although concluding that until the Ninth Circuit directly addresses the question the court would apply preclusion to the unappealable remand order