Smith v. Idaho Department of Labor (2009)

green · 31 citation events across 5 courts. Showing the 6 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 6

Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

201020182026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Nelson v. IDOL and Franklin Group (2020)

Rule Authority · Idaho · 3 citations in this opinion

Smith v. Idaho Dep’t of Labor, 148 Idaho 72, 73 , 218 P.3d 1133, 1134 (2009).

green People v. English (2023)

Rule Authority · Ill.

To the extent courts have held otherwise, largely because a private entity could manipulate the date on the postage meter stamp (see Smith v. Idaho Department of Labor, 218 P.3d 1133, 1136 (Idaho 2009)), those concerns are not present in the case of an incarcerated litigant who has no access to the postage meter itself.

green Bunn v. HERITAGE SAFE CO. (2010)

Rule Authority · Idaho

Smith v. Idaho Dep’t of Labor, 148 Idaho 72, 73 , 218 P.3d 1133, 1134 (2009).

green MacHado v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission (2010)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion

See Smith v. Idaho Dep’t of La bor, 148 Idaho 72 , 218 P.3d 1133, 1136 (2009) (holding that private-postage-meter stamp could not substitute for postmark to establish date of appeal filing, and that “the meter mark is merely evidence of whether postage was paid — not when it was placed in USPS custody”); Arza v. Fla. Elections Comm’n, 907 So.2d 604, 605 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (noting that under Florida Administrative Code Rule 2B-1.0052, a “metered postmark does not constitute a…

holding that private-postage-meter stamp could not substitute for postmark to establish date of appeal filing, and that “the meter mark is merely evidence of whether postage was paid — not when it was placed in USPS custody”

green Scott v. Home Depot USA, Inc. (2024)

Cited · Idaho · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Smith v. Idaho Dep’t of Labor, 148 Idaho 72, 74 , 218 P.3d 1133, 1135 (2009); Allen v. Partners in Healthcare, Inc., 170 Idaho 470 , 479, 512 P.3d 1093, 1102 (2022).

green Vickery v. IDHW (2020)

Cited · Idaho Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Smith v. Idaho Dept. of Labor, 148 Idaho 72, 76 , 218 P.3d 1133, 1137 (2009) (ruling piece of mail is presumed sent on date of postmark).

ruling piece of mail is presumed sent on date of postmark