Sunrise Toyota, Ltd. v. Toyota Motor Co. (1972)
green
· 60 citation events
across 16 courts.
Showing the 26 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197319992026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Wells Fargo & Company v. Wells Fargo Express Company (1977)
A similar test for jurisdiction was set out by the Second Circuit in Gelfand v. Tanner Motor Tours, Ltd., 385 F.2d 116, 121 (2d Cir. 1967): 68 (A) foreign corporation is doing business in New York "in the traditional sense" when its New York representative provides services beyond "mere solicitation" and these services are sufficiently important to the foreign corporation that if it did not have a representative to perform them, the corporation's own officials would undertak…
green
Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co. (1977)
Several courts have acknowledged the validity of this “alter ego” theory as a means by which to reach the out-of-state parent, see, e. g., Volkswagen Interamericana, S. A. v. Rohlsen, 360 F.2d 437, 440-41 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 919 , 87 S.Ct. 230 , 17 L.Ed.2d 143 (1966); Boryk v. deHavilland Aircraft Co., 341 F.2d 666, 667-68 (2d Cir. 1965); Idaho Potato Comm’n v. Washington Potato Comm’n, 410 F.Supp. 171, 179-80 (D.Idaho 1975); Call Carl, Inc. v. B P Oil Corp., …
green
Dana I. Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corporation (1978)
Schmidt & Sons, Inc., 403 F.Supp. 643, 653 (E.D.Pa.1975); Sunrise Toyota, Ltd. v. Toyota Motor Car Co., 55 F.R.D. 519, 532 (S.D.N.Y.1972).
per curiam
green
Bulova Watch Co., Inc. v. K. Hattori & Co., Ltd. (1981)
Freeman v. Gordon & Breach, Science Publishers, Inc., 398 F.Supp. 519, 522 (S.D.N.Y.1975), quoting Sunrise Toyota, Ltd. v. Toyota Motor Co., 55 F.R.D. 519, 528 (S.D.N.Y.1972).
On its own invoices, which also explicitly declare it to be a member of the SNIA Group, Snia is listed as New York “area representative.” In the circumstances of this corporate relationship the decision to incorporate the subsidiary responsible for sales in New York under the name Snia Viscosa, Inc., employing the acronym for the parent Societa Nazionale Industria Applicazioni Viscosa already widely used by the SNIA Group, permits the inference of a deliberate decision to ad…
green
In Re Ski Train Fire in Kaprun, Austria on Nov. 11 (2002)
See Bellomo, 488 F.Supp. at 746 n. 4 (noting as part of agency analysis that a finding of jurisdiction does not require piercing the corporate veil); see also id. at 745-47 (holding that while plaintiff had not established foreign parent’s control over New York subsidiary such that jurisdiction could be found pursuant to alter ego/mere department theory, jurisdiction nevertheless existed under agency theory); Sunrise Toyota Ltd. v. Toyota Motor Co., 55 F.R.D. 519, 527-28 (S.…
green
Palmieri v. Estefan (1992)
Heller & Co., Inc. v. Novacor Chemicals Ltd., 726 F.Supp. 49, 52 (S.D.N.Y.1988); Top Form Mills v. Sociedad Nationale Ind., Etc., 428 F.Supp. 1237, 1242 (S.D.N.Y.1977); Sunrise Toyota, Ltd. v. Toyota Motor Co., 55 F.R.D. 519, 523 (S.D.N.Y.1972).
green
Mularkey v. Holsum Bakery, Inc. (1988)
Sunrise Toyota, Ltd. v. Toyota Motor Co., 55 F.R.D. 519, 533 (S.D.N.Y.1972).
green
Larball Pub. Co., Inc. v. CBS INC. (1987)
Sunrise Toyota, Ltd. v. Toyota Motor Co., 55 F.R.D. 519, 528 (S.D.N.Y.1972); Freeman, 398 F.Supp. at 521 .
green
Chrysler Corp. v. General Motors Corp. (1984)
Sunrise Toyota, Ltd. v. Toyota Motor Co., 55 F.R.D. 519, 529-30 (S.D.N.Y.1972).
green
Soltex Polymer Corp. v. Fortex Industries, Inc. (1984)
Bulova, supra, 508 F.Supp. at 1334 , citing, Freemen v. Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers, Inc., 398 F.Supp. 519, 522 (S.D.N.Y.1975), quoting, Sunrise Toyota, Ltd. v. Toyota Motor Co., 55 F.R.D. 519, 528 (S.D.N.Y.1972).
See United States v. Scophony Corp., 333 U.S. 795, 810-17 , 68 S.Ct. 855 , 92 L.Ed. 1091 (1948); Hunt v. Mobil Oil Co., 410 F.Supp. 4, 8-9 (S.D.N.Y. 1975) (Weinfeld, J.), aff’d, 550 F.2d 68 (2d Cir. 1977); Sunrise Toyota Ltd. v. Toyota Motor Co., 55 F.R.D. 519, 524 (S.D.N.Y. 1972) (Lasker, J.).
Lasker, J.
green
Sun First National Bank of Orlando v. Miller (1978)
In Sunrise Toyota, Ltd. v. Toyota Motor Co., 55 F.R.D. 519, 528 (S.D.N.Y.1972), Judge Lasker summarized the principles espoused by the New York cases on this question. “[T]here are two theories by which the Japanese parent corporation may be found to be ‘present’ in New York: (a) if the relationship between the foreign parents and local subsidiaries gives rise to a ‘valid inference’ of ‘an agency relationship’; and (b) if control by the parent of the subsidiary is ‘so comple…
green
Zyskind v. Photo-Scan Corp. (1976)
The defendant herein, however, does not sell but leases its products to in-state distributors and, retaining title, derives substantial continuing revenue from such activities. . 28 U.S.C. § 1391 (c); Arrowsmith v. United Press Int’I, 320 F.2d 219, 225 (2d Cir. 1963) (en banc); Sunrise Toyota, Ltd. v. Toyota Motor Co., 55 F.R.D. 519, 523 (S.D.N.Y.1972). .
green
Freeman v. Gordon & Breach, Science Publishers, Inc. (1975)
In Sunrise Toyota, Ltd. v. Toyota Motor Co., 55 F.R.D. 519, 528 (S.D.N.Y.1972), Judge Lasker rephrased the above statement in light of the subsequent decision of the New York Court of Appeals in Delagi v. Volkswagenwerk A.G. of Wolfsburg, Germany, 29 N.Y.2d *522 426, 328 N.Y.S.2d 653 , 278 N.E.2d 895 (1972) : As restated in Délagi, there are two theories by which the . . . parent corporations here may be found to be “present” in New York: (a) if the relationship between the …
green
Kohn v. Royall, Koegel & Wells (1973)
Sunrise Toyota, Ltd. v. Toyota Motor Co., Ltd., 55 F.R.D. 519, 534 (S.D.N.Y.1972).
green
MacNamara v. City of New York (2011)
See Sunrise Toyota, Ltd. v. Toyota Motor Co., 55 F.R.D. 519, 533 (S.D.N.Y.1972).
green
Seal v. Riverside Federal Savings Bank (1993)
See Sunrise, 55 F.R.D. at 528 n. 4.
green
Indian Head, Inc. v. Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. (1983)
See Sunrise Toyota, Ltd. v. Toyota Motor Co., 55 F.R.D. 519 , 526 n. 3 (S.D.N.Y.1972); Raul International Corp. v. Nu-Era Gear Corp., 28 F.R.D. 368, 372 (S.D.N.Y.1961); see also Abrams v. Bendix Home Appliances, 96 F.Supp. 3, 7 (S.D.N.Y.1951).
green
Republic Nat. Bank of New York v. Sabet (1981)
See Sunrise Toyota v. Toyota Motor Co., 55 F.R.D. 519 (S.D.N.Y.1972).
green
Finance Co. of America v. BankAmerica Corp. (1980)
See also Sunrise Toyota Ltd. v. Toyota Motor Co., 55 F.R.D. 519 (S.D.N.Y. 1972).
green
Call Carl, Inc. v. BP Oil Corporation (1975)
See, e. g., Sunrise Toyota, Ltd. v. Toyota Motors, 55 F.R.D. 519 (S.D.
See Sunrise Toyota, Ltd. v. Toyota Motor Co., Ltd., 55 F.R.D. 519 (S.D.N.Y.1972) (Lasker, J.).
See also, Sunrise Toyota, Ltd. v. Toyota Motor Co., 55 F.R.D. 519, 530-31 (S.D.N.Y.1972).
green
Matarazzo v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp. (1974)
See Sunrise Toyota, Ltd. v. Toyota Motor Co., 55 F.R.D. 519 (S.D.N.Y.1973) ; Seligson v. The Plum Tree, Inc., 55 F.R.D. 259 (E.D.Pa.1972). .
green
Buchholtz v. Swift & Co. (1973)
See Sunrise Toyota Ltd. v. Toyota Motor Company, 55 F.R.D. 519, 534 (S.D.N.Y. 1972); Berland v. Mack, 48 F.R.D. 121, 132 (S.D.N.Y.1969); Weiss v. Tenney Corporation, 47 F.R.D. 283, 294 (S.D.N.